• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How important is lobe separation in camshaft selection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LXSTASY
  • Start date Start date May 23, 2005

LXSTASY

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2000
932
0
0
Long Island, NY
May 23, 2005
#1
  • May 23, 2005
  • #1
I am in the process of a HCI build-up. I already have AFR 165's (cleaned up on exhaust), ported and gasket matched cobra intake, BBK longtubes (1-5/8), Dr. Gas 2-1/2" X-pipe. I plan on running 24# injectors with a C&L 76 mm mass air.

My question is on camshaft selection. I am looking at the comp cams XE270HR. There are two versions of the cam with different lobe separations. One is 112* and the other is 114*. The specs are 218/224 @.050 and .512/.512 with a 1.6 rocker. From what I vaguely understand is that the lower the l/s (112*) the more power it makes in higher rpm. Conversely the higher the l/s is the beter it will idle. I would like the cam to idle well without headaches, and a chip will come later in time. Would a 114* l/s be a better choice or can I get away with a 112*?

Would the 112* make more power than the 114*?

Dan
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
May 23, 2005
#2
  • May 23, 2005
  • #2
I would use the 112LSA and never look back
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 23, 2005
#3
  • May 23, 2005
  • #3
You really can't generalize much when it comes to cams -- go here, open every tab and read. You'll see what I mean - it's the valve events that are important. Duration, LSA, etc. just fall out of calculations AFTER valve event timing is determined.

http://www.wighat.com/fcr3/
 
S

skip nay

New Member
Apr 15, 2005
110
0
0
Chambersburg Pa
May 23, 2005
#4
  • May 23, 2005
  • #4
106-108
all motor and nothing more and want the most out of that motor

108-112
motor maybe a little less hot or small amounts of nitrious

112-116
motor lazy but you can use lots of nitrious, blower, and/or turbo with alot more boost

Hope this helps you out. Just a simply way of explaining and then you can decide what you need or call a cam place and they could help you more.
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
May 24, 2005
#5
  • May 24, 2005
  • #5
For your parts the 112LSA has less emphasis on the exhaust, which the 165s don't need. It also closes intake earlier and opens exhaust later giving less overlap but still enough to keep idle issues from happening & making more power.
 

LXSTASY

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2000
932
0
0
Long Island, NY
May 25, 2005
#6
  • May 25, 2005
  • #6
So for the most power with a good idle a 112* would be the best?
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
May 25, 2005
#7
  • May 25, 2005
  • #7
Yes, earlier clsoing intake will make more torque sooner and less overlap will make more power up high. These should equate to more power over a wider rpm range (area under curve). Also, the the tighter LSA (in your setup) is a closer match to what your setup requires. Both cams have both low durations and enough overlap to give you a smooth idle.
 

nosmatt

Founding Member
Oct 13, 2000
1,356
0
37
Bass Lake, Ca
May 25, 2005
#8
  • May 25, 2005
  • #8
skip nay said:
106-108
all motor and nothing more and want the most out of that motor

108-112
motor maybe a little less hot or small amounts of nitrious

112-116
motor lazy but you can use lots of nitrious, blower, and/or turbo with alot more boost

Hope this helps you out. Just a simply way of explaining and then you can decide what you need or call a cam place and they could help you more.
Click to expand...

REALLY?

LMAO

anyway, michael said it already.......


but, i will ask ya, does your rule of thumb apply to say a 306, with an afr 205 head, and a tfs r intake, that wants to rev to say 6800rpm???

which lsa is perfect now?


now, same combo, but with ported e7 heads????

OHH, AND IS A STOCK 5.0 LAZY DOWN LOW? about the only place it has anything actually.......know what the lsa is on a stock 5.0?
 

LXSTASY

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2000
932
0
0
Long Island, NY
May 25, 2005
#9
  • May 25, 2005
  • #9
So a 112* will make more power over a wider band and should idle fine b/c the overlap isn't that big?
Correct me if I am wrong anywhere.
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
May 25, 2005
#10
  • May 25, 2005
  • #10
nosmatt said:
REALLY?

LMAO

anyway, michael said it already.......


but, i will ask ya, does your rule of thumb apply to say a 306, with an afr 205 head, and a tfs r intake, that wants to rev to say 6800rpm???

which lsa is perfect now?


now, same combo, but with ported e7 heads????

OHH, AND IS A STOCK 5.0 LAZY DOWN LOW? about the only place it has anything actually.......know what the lsa is on a stock 5.0?
Click to expand...

I'm curious now... What is the LSA on a stock cam? I never cared to look before.

*edit* Ok they seem to range from 116 - 118 ha ha ha.
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
May 26, 2005
#11
  • May 26, 2005
  • #11
"Correct me if I am wrong anywhere."

No correction needed, right on all accounts.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 26, 2005
#12
  • May 26, 2005
  • #12
LXSTACY - I guess I see it differently than 90Notch. You simply can't make generalizations of the type that many are making in the thread when it comes to cams. It depends on the particular set up....just not much of a way around that.
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
May 26, 2005
#13
  • May 26, 2005
  • #13
Mods: 3:73's, hurst shifter, mac shorties, bassani x w/cats, flowmasters, underdrive pulley, C&L 76mm MAF, chrome ponies, B springs, subframes, Southside upper C/A's, battle boxes, Aluminum D\S, Nitto drag radials, smoked headlights, 8500k HID's
In process:
AFR 165 58cc Stud Mount
Ported Cobra
Steeda Aero Wing (ordered 5/23)
LT's, Dr. Gas X. Chrome Tails
Black Leather Seats
UPR C/A's and CC Plates
Bumpsteer Kit
+More

I am in the process of a HCI build-up. I already have AFR 165's (cleaned up on exhaust), ported and gasket matched cobra intake, BBK longtubes (1-5/8), Dr. Gas 2-1/2" X-pipe. I plan on running 24# injectors with a C&L 76 mm mass air.

Would the 112* make more power than the 114*?
Click to expand...

LXSTACY - I guess I see it differently than 90Notch. You simply can't make generalizations of the type that many are making in the thread when it comes to cams. It depends on the particular set up....just not much of a way around that.
Click to expand...

Mike I'm confused, he provided us with his specific setup then asked of two cams which would make more power. What generalizations are being made?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 26, 2005
#14
  • May 26, 2005
  • #14
I think you and I just have a difference of opinion about it. No big deal. I can't conclude what would happen with just a change in LSA in his circumstance. I'd want someone like Buddy or Ed to model it and tell me what the impacts of that change might be. Think about it - you can change the LSA - and depending on how that's done, that can impact the intake opening/closing event, the exhaust opening/closing event or both of them. So simply moving to a 112 LSA doesn't dictate how the valve timing will change. And it's the specific valve timing that will tell you how the power and torque characteristics are gonna be affected. LSA is just a calculation that falls out after the timing events are set.

That's why I say it's probably an over-generalization to say that a certain change in LSA will cause certain specific changes in the engine's character.

But -- take it with a grain of salt. Just my perspective.
 
9

90Notch

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,046
0
0
Westwood, MA & yes it's killing me that I'm no
May 26, 2005
#15
  • May 26, 2005
  • #15
"I can't conclude what would happen with just a change in LSA in his circumstance. "

Sure you can, the different LSAs have different vlv events associated with them that are easily determined. Reread my posts and you'll see that my opinion is based on the difference in the intake events, exhaust events and overlap from this cam having a 112 LSA rather than 114LSA. Buddy's chart tells the same story I do.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
May 26, 2005
#16
  • May 26, 2005
  • #16
What kinda LSA is in a B-Cam, just to give me an idea of what kinda idle were looking at here with certain LSA's.
 
S

SPEED FREAK

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,448
0
0
Regina, SK.
May 26, 2005
#17
  • May 26, 2005
  • #17
My understanding was that the comp cams XE series cams have ridiculously quick ramp rates (valves open and shut faster) so in this case I would have to say that the difference in the lsa is more closely related to idle quality than anything else (give up most of the overlap with the 114*) Either cam will work really well I'd assume i have always seen great results with the xe 270... It will be going in my next project.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
May 26, 2005
#18
  • May 26, 2005
  • #18
90Notch said - "Sure you can." And that's where we disagree. You've mistaken your use of pronouns. YOU can. I can't. I don't see your interpretation of the issues the way you do. I'm ok with that.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
May 26, 2005
#19
  • May 26, 2005
  • #19
The stock cam has an LSA of 116
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

V
pushrod 5.0 (MILD/ Torque) turbo build for an old scout II help
  • vz58
  • Apr 21, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jan 21, 2026
Flyboy60
F
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
784
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
M
Engine Cam Question
  • Middleagecrisis
  • Jan 10, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 14, 2022
Middleagecrisis
M
Rebuild heads or new heads
  • Funwithfox
  • Aug 31, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 3, 2020
Boostedpimp
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?