• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox How low to go or not go? - Lowering springs.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1987LX5.0
  • Start date Start date Nov 11, 2021
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

1987LX5.0

Member
Dec 30, 2020
27
3
13
London, Ontario
Nov 11, 2021
#1
  • Nov 11, 2021
  • #1
I'm looking to replace my original 34 year old springs and struts/shocks. What in your opinion would look the best when considering lowering springs? Would you leave ride height as factory, lower between 1/2 to an inch, 1 1/2 inch or ? Picture is as car sits today.
 

Attachments

  • Drivers side view.webp
    681.2 KB · Views: 1,369
  • Passenger side view.webp
    673.1 KB · Views: 649

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,955
2,937
153
Long Island, NY
Nov 11, 2021
#2
  • Nov 11, 2021
  • #2
I just went with Eibach Pro-kit springs, and MM adjustable rear control arms. I love where it sits right now. Not too low, but can definitely tell it’s lowered.
 
Last edited: Nov 11, 2021

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,942
10,582
203
polk county florida
Nov 11, 2021
#3
  • Nov 11, 2021
  • #3
Wow, fine line there, opinion, wheel/tire choice and size, ride, clearance all play a part. I would go here to see some examples

Post pics of how your foxbody currently sits

pics of how your foxbody currently sits
stangnet.com
I like your ride just the way it is, I also like 1/2 to 1" lowered stangs as long as the wheels are not to big.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Nov 11, 2021
#4
  • Nov 11, 2021
  • #4
I’m down about 1”- 1.5” but on coil-overs. Does make a difference in ride quality when you go that low.

 
Reactions: Shakerhood

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,942
10,582
203
polk county florida
Nov 11, 2021
#5
  • Nov 11, 2021
  • #5
And there is a current discussion on ride height and stuff here:

Fox Body Shocks/Struts and Lowering Springs thoughts?

I have a 1987 LX 5.0 Hatch that has the original suspension components with Maximum Motorsports full length subframe connectors added. I'd like to replace the factory shocks/struts and consider swapping out factory springs for lowering springs but really I'm not interested in the slammed look...
www.stangnet.com
 
1

1987LX5.0

Member
Dec 30, 2020
27
3
13
London, Ontario
Nov 12, 2021
#6
  • Nov 12, 2021
  • #6
General karthief said:
Wow, fine line there, opinion, wheel/tire choice and size, ride, clearance all play a part. I would go here to see some examples

Post pics of how your foxbody currently sits

pics of how your foxbody currently sits
stangnet.com
I like your ride just the way it is, I also like 1/2 to 1" lowered stangs as long as the wheels are not to big.
Click to expand...
Current tires are 275/40/R17's on rear and 245/45/R17's on front. The Ford lowering springs "B" is one consideration that lowers between 1/2 to 1".
 

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,955
2,937
153
Long Island, NY
Nov 12, 2021
#7
  • Nov 12, 2021
  • #7
1987LX5.0 said:
Current tires are 275/40/R17's on rear and 245/45/R17's on front. The Ford lowering springs "B" is one consideration that lowers between 1/2 to 1".
Click to expand...
That’s the exact sizes I’m running in my picture a few posts up.
 
Reactions: General karthief
1

1987LX5.0

Member
Dec 30, 2020
27
3
13
London, Ontario
Nov 12, 2021
#8
  • Nov 12, 2021
  • #8
Rdub6 said:
That’s the exact sizes I’m running in my picture a few posts up.
Click to expand...
That's helpful to know your tire sizes are the same and I'm assuming you have no rub issues? Would you be between 1 - 1 1/2 inch lower than factory? Your black rims contrast nicely with your red paint.
 

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,955
2,937
153
Long Island, NY
Nov 12, 2021
#9
  • Nov 12, 2021
  • #9
1987LX5.0 said:
That's helpful to know your tire sizes are the same and I'm assuming you have no rub issues? Would you be between 1 - 1 1/2 inch lower than factory? Your black rims contrast nicely with your red paint.
Click to expand...
I had the fox body rear sag before this, so it definitely helped lower the front more than the rear, but I’d say it probably came down about an inch.
Fronts do rub on full lock, but normal driving is not an issue.
Thanks on the rims. I had the black/red theme in my head as soon as I started this build and it finally came to fruition!
Here’s the before and after. It’s the same paint, just different lighting, and a lot of polishing later.
 
Reactions: thinkfaster, Shakerhood and General karthief

pavlos413

Member
Jul 26, 2021
22
13
13
Kansas
Nov 14, 2021
#10
  • Nov 14, 2021
  • #10
I put a set of Steeda Lowering springs and matched them up with Kony Orange. I feel like it's not slammed and the ride is pretty comfortable. I was worried there might be some rubbing issues but nothing at all so far. I'm on my stock pony's though so not sure about different sets of rims.

https://lmr.com/item/ST-5558200/79-04-Mustang-Steeda-Sport-Lowering-Springs-Kit?token=b6fa93edb6667379202202a34c5a42156b6e1213&utm_source=yotpo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=map
 
Reactions: Boostedpimp, Rdub6 and General karthief

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Nov 15, 2021
#11
  • Nov 15, 2021
  • #11
Although probably hard to find today, l have 2001 Bullitt Struts, Springs, and Shocks on my car which dropped it about 3/4".
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Nov 15, 2021
#12
  • Nov 15, 2021
  • #12
I actually loved how my Mach 1 springs (tiny bit taller than Bullitt springs) sat and rode. With good struts/shocks, i think they are almost the perfect spring for the fox.

I no longer run them, but I saved them just in case i ever get another Fox/SN95
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,942
10,582
203
polk county florida
Nov 15, 2021
#13
  • Nov 15, 2021
  • #13
I would like to run Mach1 springs.
I wouldn't mind if the rest of the car is still attached
 
1

1987LX5.0

Member
Dec 30, 2020
27
3
13
London, Ontario
Nov 16, 2021
#14
  • Nov 16, 2021
  • #14
Shakerhood said:
Although probably hard to find today, l have 2001 Bullitt Struts, Springs, and Shocks on my car which dropped it about 3/4".
Click to expand...
I thought the Ford Motor Sport M-5300-B might be my best bet since the specs list a 0.875" front drop and 0.500" for the rear, but our local Performance Auto supply store advised my car my actually sit higher with these springs than it is currently is sitting as the original 34 year old springs likely have sagged some and in addition if I did get the drop as specified I may get rubbing with my current 275/40/R17 rear tires and 245/45/R17 front tires. Funny how a simple modification sometimes isn't too simple - well that is if you prefer to only do lowering springs once and get the height you want. The car does ride harder with these tires compared to original tire sizes, but does handle corners much better, however I'd prefer to not have it not handle too much harder as expansion joints on highways can have the car bang pretty loud with just a slight across the road imperfection. Weird it does this when the road imperfection is probably just 1/2 inch or so high, but you're hitting it around 60 - 70 MPH. I'm assuming most of this banging is due to the lower profile tires.
 
Reactions: Shakerhood

Olivethefet

I will own your nuts! LOL
5 Year Member
May 17, 2018
2,596
1,790
143
Enterprise AL
Nov 16, 2021
#15
  • Nov 16, 2021
  • #15
Does anyone know anything about this company?

Ford Mustang Coilovers (1979-1993) | Raceland

Our Classic Ford Mustang coilovers are height-adjustable from 1 to 3 inches below stock height. They offer higher spring and damping rates over the stock suspension to improve your Mustang's stability, grip, and look - all backed by the best, hassle-free lifetime warranty in the business and...
raceland.com
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Nov 16, 2021
#16
  • Nov 16, 2021
  • #16
1987LX5.0 said:
I thought the Ford Motor Sport M-5300-B might be my best bet since the specs list a 0.875" front drop and 0.500" for the rear, but our local Performance Auto supply store advised my car my actually sit higher with these springs than it is currently is sitting as the original 34 year old springs likely have sagged some and in addition if I did get the drop as specified I may get rubbing with my current 275/40/R17 rear tires and 245/45/R17 front tires. Funny how a simple modification sometimes isn't too simple - well that is if you prefer to only do lowering springs once and get the height you want. The car does ride harder with these tires compared to original tire sizes, but does handle corners much better, however I'd prefer to not have it not handle too much harder as expansion joints on highways can have the car bang pretty loud with just a slight across the road imperfection. Weird it does this when the road imperfection is probably just 1/2 inch or so high, but you're hitting it around 60 - 70 MPH. I'm assuming most of this banging is due to the lower profile tires.
Click to expand...
There are a lot of variables in play when it comes to choosing the right springs, shocks and struts. You've mentioned looks, handling, and ride quality in your posts. Trying to balance all of those elements will require sacrifices. Here are some basic guidelines:

1. When using a stock-style (NOT coil-over) suspension, these cars handle better when they sit higher than most people think looks cool. Going too low will make the car handle worse. I use Ford Racing C-Springs on my 1992 GT autocross car, with Steeda spring spacers up front. Going lower than 1" (especially without a spring spacer up front) will hurt the handling at the limit of traction.

2. Installing stiff aftermarket shocks and struts will make the car handle worse. Most aftermarket "performance" struts are stiffer than stock. Stiff shocks and struts, along with lower and stiffer springs, will bring the limit of traction further IN (you want the limit further OUT). Essentially, they add understeer and oversteer. I use adjustable shocks and struts on my 1992 GT, and they are set at "2" out of "5" (not very stiff). If I set the shocks and struts at "5", the car would be undriveable at the limit of traction (and that limit would be much further in).

3. Linear rate springs are better for performance driving, progressive rate springs are better on the street. Progressive springs soak up small bumps better.

4. Most people do not drive at the limit of traction (and they shouldn't on the street). It's very common for people to make their cars too low and too stiff, and not realize they've actually hurt the handling until they push the car hard (or have to make a quick evasive maneuver). How you intend to use the car is really important.

5. Your suspension mods all work together. And they all impact understeer and oversteer. Having some measure of adjustability, even for a street car, makes a big difference.

If your car is going to be a street car, I think the Ford Racing B-Springs are a good option. I would get a set of Steeda spring spacers, and poly spring isolators. I would recommend adjustable shocks and struts (Koni Yellow SA), and I'd install a larger rear sway bar to help counter the understeer from your staggered wheel and tire setup.

You also might find this video helpful:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HiS-t4_O_w&t
 
Reactions: Shakerhood and General karthief

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Nov 16, 2021
#17
  • Nov 16, 2021
  • #17
Go coilovers with a quality strut/shock and have the adjustment/height you want plus it makes removal and install so much easier when needed.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Nov 16, 2021
#18
  • Nov 16, 2021
  • #18
Olivethefet said:
Does anyone know anything about this company?

Ford Mustang Coilovers (1979-1993) | Raceland

Our Classic Ford Mustang coilovers are height-adjustable from 1 to 3 inches below stock height. They offer higher spring and damping rates over the stock suspension to improve your Mustang's stability, grip, and look - all backed by the best, hassle-free lifetime warranty in the business and...
raceland.com
Click to expand...

They don't have a great reputation for riding well
 
Reactions: Olivethefet
1

1987LX5.0

Member
Dec 30, 2020
27
3
13
London, Ontario
Nov 16, 2021
#19
  • Nov 16, 2021
  • #19
Thank you f
Warhorse Racing said:
There are a lot of variables in play when it comes to choosing the right springs, shocks and struts. You've mentioned looks, handling, and ride quality in your posts. Trying to balance all of those elements will require sacrifices. Here are some basic guidelines:

1. When using a stock-style (NOT coil-over) suspension, these cars handle better when they sit higher than most people think looks cool. Going too low will make the car handle worse. I use Ford Racing C-Springs on my 1992 GT autocross car, with Steeda spring spacers up front. Going lower than 1" (especially without a spring spacer up front) will hurt the handling at the limit of traction.

2. Installing stiff aftermarket shocks and struts will make the car handle worse. Most aftermarket "performance" struts are stiffer than stock. Stiff shocks and struts, along with lower and stiffer springs, will bring the limit of traction further IN (you want the limit further OUT). Essentially, they add understeer and oversteer. I use adjustable shocks and struts on my 1992 GT, and they are set at "2" out of "5" (not very stiff). If I set the shocks and struts at "5", the car would be undriveable at the limit of traction (and that limit would be much further in).

3. Linear rate springs are better for performance driving, progressive rate springs are better on the street. Progressive springs soak up small bumps better.

4. Most people do not drive at the limit of traction (and they shouldn't on the street). It's very common for people to make their cars too low and too stiff, and not realize they've actually hurt the handling until they push the car hard (or have to make a quick evasive maneuver). How you intend to use the car is really important.

5. Your suspension mods all work together. And they all impact understeer and oversteer. Having some measure of adjustability, even for a street car, makes a big difference.

If your car is going to be a street car, I think the Ford Racing B-Springs are a good option. I would get a set of Steeda spring spacers, and poly spring isolators. I would recommend adjustable shocks and struts (Koni Yellow SA), and I'd install a larger rear sway bar to help counter the understeer from your staggered wheel and tire setup.

You also might find this video helpful:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HiS-t4_O_w&t
Click to expand...

Warhorse Racing said:
There are a lot of variables in play when it comes to choosing the right springs, shocks and struts. You've mentioned looks, handling, and ride quality in your posts. Trying to balance all of those elements will require sacrifices. Here are some basic guidelines:

1. When using a stock-style (NOT coil-over) suspension, these cars handle better when they sit higher than most people think looks cool. Going too low will make the car handle worse. I use Ford Racing C-Springs on my 1992 GT autocross car, with Steeda spring spacers up front. Going lower than 1" (especially without a spring spacer up front) will hurt the handling at the limit of traction.

2. Installing stiff aftermarket shocks and struts will make the car handle worse. Most aftermarket "performance" struts are stiffer than stock. Stiff shocks and struts, along with lower and stiffer springs, will bring the limit of traction further IN (you want the limit further OUT). Essentially, they add understeer and oversteer. I use adjustable shocks and struts on my 1992 GT, and they are set at "2" out of "5" (not very stiff). If I set the shocks and struts at "5", the car would be undriveable at the limit of traction (and that limit would be much further in).

3. Linear rate springs are better for performance driving, progressive rate springs are better on the street. Progressive springs soak up small bumps better.

4. Most people do not drive at the limit of traction (and they shouldn't on the street). It's very common for people to make their cars too low and too stiff, and not realize they've actually hurt the handling until they push the car hard (or have to make a quick evasive maneuver). How you intend to use the car is really important.

5. Your suspension mods all work together. And they all impact understeer and oversteer. Having some measure of adjustability, even for a street car, makes a big difference.

If your car is going to be a street car, I think the Ford Racing B-Springs are a good option. I would get a set of Steeda spring spacers, and poly spring isolators. I would recommend adjustable shocks and struts (Koni Yellow SA), and I'd install a larger rear sway bar to help counter the understeer from your staggered wheel and tire setup.

You also might find this video helpful:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HiS-t4_O_w&t
Click to expand...
Thank you for your reply. I think I have some more learning to do before I can determine what is the best combo to give me a slightly lowered look, with improved handling with no tire rubbing and a ride that is not much harder than my current set up that also lessens those bangs at highway speed over slight road imperfections. Good luck to me eh?
 

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,223
781
133
California
Nov 16, 2021
#20
  • Nov 16, 2021
  • #20
I have the Ford Motorsports B springs and have been very happy with the height.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210531-154044_Gallery.webp
    389.4 KB · Views: 515
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
319
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
64
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
139
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?