• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How many here run AFR 165's on 306's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NKau
  • Start date Start date Apr 3, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Apr 3, 2004
#1
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #1
Am curious how many people on here run these heads on primarily street oriented engines that see some strip action. I'm dead set on keeping my cam (.499"/.510" 221*/225* @ .50", 112* LSA) and using a performer intake I just picked up along with a 65 mm TB and 70mm MAF; still not sure if I'll have to jump up to 24 lb. injectors or not. Would these heads be a good fit for my combo in putting me around 300 rwhp while maintaing decent bottom end power (as much as the cam will allow)?
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Apr 4, 2004
#2
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #2
Bizzump.....nobody has even a half-baked opinion?
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Apr 4, 2004
#3
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #3
AFR's on a mildly cammed 306 will perform really, really well. AFR's are a great head. The average and higher hp-torque level's will be alot higher than E7's if that is the head you have. I don't think you will notice a difference in low end snap. Can't go wrong with AFR.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Apr 4, 2004
#4
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #4
I had them on my stock 80k bottom ended 302. I was very happy with them. With performer RPM, 30lb injectors, 218/222 @.05, 109ls, .528/.534 lift FTI cam, made 303rwhp. Only 6mph slower than Mike Keirsteads iron headed gt-40 combo , should ask him more about his setup
Mike.
 

PURESTREET5006

New Member
Apr 1, 2003
349
0
0
In the tech line for tear down"AGAIN"
Apr 4, 2004
#5
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #5
The AFR 165's are very good heads and i would recommend them for a street car.I have them on my car and i'm very happy with my results....See Sig.
 

all1knew

Member
Feb 15, 2004
64
0
7
Macomb, IL - 61455
Apr 4, 2004
#6
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #6
Twisted Wedge vs. AFT 165

Hello all,

This is just my opinion, so please don't beat me up.

If you have ever looked at the flow charts of the AFR 165's you will see that YES, these are an excellent street head.

What you should consider if you are thinking about buying a pair.....

The AFR 165 heads come CNC machined. The Twisted Wedge heads do not, and they hold right next to the AFR's on the flow chart.

Just something you might want to consider, as a set of ported Twisted Wedge heads would be a better choice in my opinion.

Please let me know what you guys think. Thanks.

Bill
 

PURESTREET5006

New Member
Apr 1, 2003
349
0
0
In the tech line for tear down"AGAIN"
Apr 4, 2004
#7
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #7
Yea..Your right about that,but the T/W you can only use a certian cam size cam and then your gonna have to get new(twisted wedge) pistons...And my AFR 165's are total different from an off the shelf set of 165 heads.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Apr 4, 2004
#8
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #8
I'm no expert, but what I have learned is that flow to port size is an important factor. AFR's do the best job of this, especailly with the 165's which flow about the same as TFS but with only a 165cc port, vs. the TFS 180cc port "or is it 170" so the AFR's keep the velosity, and do all this with smaller valves. Also, I have scene the best results with AFR's.

I can't say from expereince because I have Thumper ported E7's, now I think I may have outgrown them, and AFR 165's would be my choice but I am probally going to do a rebuild this comming winter and then I will get the new heads.
 
A

autoXr1

Founding Member
May 3, 2001
1,838
0
0
Michigan
Apr 4, 2004
#9
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #9
Got'em. See sig.

A 65mm TB/EGR will be more than enough on a street/strip combo, 24# injectors, 70-73mm MAF, Performer intake, etc. would likely put out roughly 275-300 RWHP depending upon the tuning and other mods.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Apr 4, 2004
#10
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #10
all1knew said:
The AFR 165 heads come CNC machined. The Twisted Wedge heads do not, and they hold right next to the AFR's on the flow chart.
Click to expand...

I was looking pretty hard at the TFS twisted wedge's as a matter of fact, but as someone else mentioned, they have a larger port volume and valve size that would theoretically kill low end HP/TQ a bit more than something like the AFR 165's. Being that it's primarily a street car, I'm willing to give up top end power to maintain slightly better street manners. If I was doing a stroker build up, I'd probably be all over the TFS heads at that price.

Thanks for everyones opinions and advice.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Apr 4, 2004
#11
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #11
NKau said:
Being that it's primarily a street car, I'm willing to give up top end power to maintain slightly better street manners.
Click to expand...

Mine got 17-20mpg around town, 23-26mpg on the highway, and idled all day between 700-750rpms with no surging. Street manners will depend on camshaft selection more than cylinder head selection. I went with TFS "R" heads out of the box on my 418, #'s in sig. I've been happy with both heads, you will be too. EITHER head is a great choice.
mike.
 
T

tistan2

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
128
0
0
Apr 4, 2004
#12
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #12
I just bought a set of afr 165. I have not put them on the car yet. I was looking at the twisted wedge heads, but a lot of people I have talked to said that the tw heads have problems with the valve guides and that they have to be replaced often. The other reason I got these heads is because the trickflow flow numbers are the same as afr 165 and the trickflow have a 2.02 valve compared to a 1.90. It is much easier for the air to flow by 1.90 valves than the 2.02 which in turn gives better low and mid performance. So personally I think afr makes a better street head than the trickflow.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Apr 4, 2004
#13
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #13
tistan2 said:
I just bought a set of afr 165. I have not put them on the car yet. I was looking at the twisted wedge heads, but a lot of people I have talked to said that the tw heads have problems with the valve guides and that they have to be replaced often. The other reason I got these heads is because the trickflow flow numbers are the same as afr 165 and the trickflow have a 2.02 valve compared to a 1.90. It is much easier for the air to flow by 1.90 valves than the 2.02 which in turn gives better low and mid performance. So personally I think afr makes a better street head than the trickflow.
Click to expand...

Trick flow fixed valve guide problem YEARS ago, it was an issue though. No longer an issue.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Apr 4, 2004
#14
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #14
How much are a set of afr 165's??
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Apr 4, 2004
#15
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #15
willys1 said:
How much are a set of afr 165's??
Click to expand...

I want to say they commonly list for $1350 or so; I know some have gotten them cheaper. That's why the Trick Flow's are an enticing option at $1100.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Apr 4, 2004
#16
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #16
NKau said:
I want to say they commonly list for $1350 or so; I know some have gotten them cheaper. That's why the Trick Flow's are an enticing option at $1100.
Click to expand...
I dont know,from what Ive read,Id go the extra 250
 
Q

QBstang87

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
547
0
0
Montgomery Village, Maryland
Apr 4, 2004
#17
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #17
i have 165s from fti on my motor...with my fti .547/.563, 224/228 at .050, 110 lsa. when the car is running, it is sweet. its untuned and went through the traps the first and only run i've had with it sideways shutting off in fourth after spinning every gear and blowing a freeze plug at 13.3 at 103...so untuned, fishtailing, and shutting off a good whole gear before the line, i'm impressed. just a 302 still, brand new though.
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
Apr 4, 2004
#18
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #18
the afr's seem to be a very nice head but don't down play TFS twisted wedge heads.. They are 61cc combustion chambers with I believe 170cc intake ports and with the Twisted Wedge design it rotates air over the center of the cylinder bores. And they don't loose low end torque. They don't require special pistons for the 2.02 valve as long as you stay within reason on your cam selection. they can hold .540 lift and I forget the duration but your cam shouldn't be an issue with stock pistons as long as your not using an 86 shortblock. My full weight 95 n/a 5spd with the box stock tfs heads, stock performer intake, 73mm maf, stock throttle body, crower 15510 cam 212 duration .531 lift, and the usuall exhaust, gears, and bolt ons went 13.1 at 109.5 mph with just regular 275/40/17 BFG street radial tires.. and it had ran a 109.7 mph and a 110.xx mph as well. I would have like to run it with slicks or DR's. and the computer was untouch with no tune. So TFS heads are pretty hard to beat for the price of them IMO And with the cam I used it pulled like a friking mule. No low end loss there. And later on if you were to stage III port the tfs heads.. well they are just awesome. And the valve train issues are a thing of the past as long as you use the crane gold, tfs, or FMS blue roller rockers.. others will ride the outside of the valve tip and bind them ruining the guides.. use the recommended rockers and your fine. the real issue use to be with the pedestal mount heads that are no longer made.

http://www.trickflow.com/product/prfeature_index.htm
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Apr 4, 2004
#19
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #19
they are oerfect but why not 185cc heads? they will yeild you more top end but you will prob loose some down low. im geting my worked/built pair from ed curtis.
 
T

trendkilllx

New Member
Aug 28, 2003
79
0
0
Las Vegas
Apr 5, 2004
#20
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #20
Does anybody know what the best AFR165 chamber size is for a stock 302? I think they offer them in 58cc, 61cc and 69cc.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
C
Engine Turbo 306 Running Hot
  • CPalmer72
  • Aug 14, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2019
CPalmer72
C
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
S
93 5.0 MSPNP2 tuning ?s
  • Skind
  • Jul 10, 2018
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 4 5 6
Replies
110
Views
15K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 27, 2018
Skind
S
NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?