• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

How Much HP Should I Really Have On 98 GT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98GTBlkConv
  • Start date Start date Jul 8, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

smokin'Red35th

Member
Jan 9, 2004
493
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jul 9, 2004
#21
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #21
1000000000000000 hp, minimum
 

bierbelly

Dirty Old Men Need Love Too
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2001
1,598
4
58
Sterling, VA
Jul 9, 2004
#22
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #22
NewStangNewbee said:
What rwhp do i have with full pi head intake swap?
Click to expand...

Immediately post-headswap, I dynoed 248/290 at the wheels (swirl dams intact).
 

WLD_WST

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
620
0
17
Philly
Jul 9, 2004
#23
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #23
Saleen201 said:
WLD WST, did you get the balancer?

-Mike
Click to expand...


Dammmn right, I got it the next day. I thought I left you a message about it, I was damn suprised and happy.
 

Saleen201

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
1,271
0
0
Doha, Qatar
Jul 9, 2004
#24
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #24
No i never got the message, but glad to hear you got it. So is the car up and running?

-Mike
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Jul 9, 2004
#25
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #25
bierbelly said:
OK, I had my '98 dynoed when it was completely stock except for a K&N. It dynoed at 196 RWHP. I doubt the K&N added anything. Neither will a cat back, no matter what the advertisement said.
Click to expand...


W3RD! There are not many bolt ons that will really give you anywhere near what's advertized. The 4.6L needs bigger, more expensive mods to really make it fly.
 

bierbelly

Dirty Old Men Need Love Too
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2001
1,598
4
58
Sterling, VA
Jul 9, 2004
#26
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #26
mrvax said:
W3RD! There are not many bolt ons that will really give you anywhere near what's advertized. The 4.6L needs bigger, more expensive mods to really make it fly.
Click to expand...

Yeah, like an LS1 engine...
 
9

98GtRioRed

New Member
Dec 7, 2002
87
0
0
Jul 9, 2004
#27
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #27
I have a 98 Rio Red stang. The best mod for this motor if you want any power is the supercharger. I use the SVO at 6lbs and I put down 311 hp before the tune. The tune net me about 20 more. I like the SVO for the fact that it gets the plastic pos intake off of my car. Plastic belongs on my dash, not my motor.

Best of luck.
 

98GTBlkConv

New Member
May 26, 2004
63
0
0
Jul 9, 2004
#28
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #28
stimmler said:
Do the tuner before the the plenum and tb. If you are going for the headswap don't get the tuner, not sure it will work after the swap. Custom chip would probably be better post swap.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the advice. I have been wondering which order to follow. I am still unsure about the headswap as my mechanic tells me most people are disappointed at "true gains" after having PI headswap done.
 

98GTBlkConv

New Member
May 26, 2004
63
0
0
Jul 9, 2004
#29
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #29
stimmler said:
superchips programmer won't fix speedo's on 98's either. Found out the hard way.
Click to expand...

Hey stimmler! Did your superchips programmer make a noticeable difference with the mods you have? I am considering following your mod list (somewhat)! How do you like your plenum and tb setup?
 

bierbelly

Dirty Old Men Need Love Too
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2001
1,598
4
58
Sterling, VA
Jul 9, 2004
#30
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #30
98GTBlkConv said:
Thanks for the advice. I have been wondering which order to follow. I am still unsure about the headswap as my mechanic tells me most people are disappointed at "true gains" after having PI headswap done.
Click to expand...

He just doesn't want to do the work...probably he's not qualified to do it. I've NEVER heard anybody that's had the headswap done complain about it.
 

98GTBlkConv

New Member
May 26, 2004
63
0
0
Jul 9, 2004
#31
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #31
bierbelly said:
He just doesn't want to do the work...probably he's not qualified to do it. I've NEVER heard anybody that's had the headswap done complain about it.
Click to expand...

I think he'd be happy to do the job as he would be making $$$. However, he is pushing me more towards the supercharger route. Of course, he is quoting me somewhere around $5k installed. This, of course, is more money than the headswap. Modifying these cars does get expensive if you are not doing the work yourself!
 

bierbelly

Dirty Old Men Need Love Too
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2001
1,598
4
58
Sterling, VA
Jul 9, 2004
#32
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #32
98GTBlkConv said:
I think he'd be happy to do the job as he would be making $$$. However, he is pushing me more towards the supercharger route. Of course, he is quoting me somewhere around $5k installed. This, of course, is more money than the headswap. Modifying these cars does get expensive if you are not doing the work yourself!
Click to expand...

IMHO, do the headswap and stay N/A. You will pay in spades if something goes awry with your A/F ratio when you force induction. Plus, you'll then need to upgrade rear end, clutch, possibly the tranny, etc., etc. It just goes on and on. By the time you've replaced everything you need to handle the huge increase in power, you could have bought a Vette or Viper and have much more potential.
 

danny g

Founding Member
Sep 23, 1999
375
5
18
Jul 9, 2004
#33
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #33
i got 201 rwhp on my 96 5spd with flowmasters K&N and frpp pullies with a tune from laroccas. I dont think thats too bad. 170 - 180? What are you smoking? maybe a stock 96 - 97 auto without even a k&n and a ton of miles would do that.
 
9

96stanggt-vert

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
27
0
0
Jul 9, 2004
#34
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #34
Saleen201 said:
I had 190 on the dot with full exhaust (LTs, O/R H, Borla Cat-back), K&N air filter, and Saleen factory tune. so i think 170-180 is pretty accurate.
-Mike
Click to expand...

Unless you have like 400k miles on that car or you're like 10,000 ft. above sea level something is wrong with your car buddy. Check my sig. that's with a bolt on turd.
 
9

98SteedaStang

Member
Dec 11, 2002
382
0
16
Chicago Suburbs
Jul 10, 2004
#35
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #35
96stanggt-vert said:
Unless you have like 400k miles on that car or you're like 10,000 ft. above sea level something is wrong with your car buddy. Check my sig. that's with a bolt on turd.
Click to expand...
Was that a mustang dyno or a dynojet? Nice numbers.
 

Saleen201

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
1,271
0
0
Doha, Qatar
Jul 10, 2004
#36
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #36
98SteedaStang said:
Was that a mustang dyno or a dynojet? Nice numbers.
Click to expand...

Mine was a mustang dyno, i forgot to mention that.

-Mike
 
9

96stanggt-vert

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
27
0
0
Jul 10, 2004
#37
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #37
Saleen201 said:
Mine was a mustang dyno, i forgot to mention that.

-Mike
Click to expand...

OOHHH now that makes more sense. Mine was on a dynojet. To be honest I was really happy w/ my #'s. Our club had a dyno day on an extremely hot day (96* 90% humidity) but I really didn't care because all I wanted was a baseline for my headswap. I was hoping for 210-215 hp and 260 tq, and I was very happy after my #'s came up on the computer. But if I had gone my manu. #'s for my bolt-ons I would have like 240 at the wheels!
 

Saleen201

Founding Member
Jan 26, 2002
1,271
0
0
Doha, Qatar
Jul 10, 2004
#38
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #38
looks like we did it on the same day, it was about 95* and like 92% humidity the day i did it. Not to mention that my AC only blows defrost and floor (not vent) so i cant use my AC. So i am driving all over DE/PA/MD/NJ sweating my ass of. but anyway, nice numbers i too will be doing a headswap soon, along with a buch of other goodies.

-Mike

*EDIT* as a matter of fact i have the graph, the temp and humidity are hand written at the top, it was hotter then i thought.

 
S

stimmler

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
248
0
17
Japan
Jul 10, 2004
#39
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #39
98GTBlkConv said:
Hey stimmler! Did your superchips programmer make a noticeable difference with the mods you have? I am considering following your mod list (somewhat)! How do you like your plenum and tb setup?
Click to expand...

It was the most noticable single mod that I have done. Adding the plenum and TB opened it up even more, especially the top end. Pulls better than a stock PI now. Still figureing out what to do next, KB blower or P&P PI heads and cams or mach 1 engine. Would rather supercharge but $$$$$ is the problem. Never heard anybody complain about the PI headswap not getting noticable power. Using the NPI block with PI heads increases the compression so you get more hp than a stock pi motor. Just the PI intake alone gives you 15hp.
 
9

98SteedaStang

Member
Dec 11, 2002
382
0
16
Chicago Suburbs
Jul 10, 2004
#40
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #40
My Headswap was done in July and it was hot too, does that make a big difference? Also I was thinking about this, When they worked on my heads they disconected the battery, then hooked it back up when they were done and dynoed it. I though I remember hearing that when you do a higher flow X or H pipe It takes a few trips for your computer to adjust, is that true? If so then my computer never got a chance to re-learn the car? Or does this have no effect and is compleatly untrue?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Vortech V3 Si - Bypass Valve to BOV swap issues
  • seanmahoney
  • Jun 26, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
625
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 26, 2025
seanmahoney
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
695
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
916
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
D
Fuel 1985 GT Fuel Line Diagram
  • DienstXIV
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 12, 2025
DienstXIV
D
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?