• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

How much is just enough.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95stangGT
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2004
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Apr 30, 2004
#1
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #1
So I have come to a standstill with the mustang. I'm at the point where I wanna begin adding some extra ponies to the car. Currently it is a 95 AODE with only a flowmaster catback. I'm kind of torn between H/C/I or a turbo kit at the moment though. This car will be an everyday driver also. If I were to go H/C/I it would be AFR 165s, edelbrock performer RPM II, and a FTI custom cam along with some bolt ons including mac longtubes, mac prochamber, ASP underdrive pullies, and I don't know about a mass air yet or injectors. With this combo I should be seeing roughly 300 to the wheels correct? I know killercanary has a similiar combo and runs low to mid twelves. That should be good for a street car right? Or is it? Then we got the turbo which would net me around 350 RWHP and over 400 RWTQ. Keep in mind I'm gonna be going from around 170 RWHP to at least 300 RWHP through a 5-speed instead cuz I would do a 5-speed swap since I'd be able to afford it where as with the turbo I wouldn't.

Now one more question, how are 03 cobras mid 12 sec cars with over 370 RWHP but yet killercanary pulls that off also. Is it all becuase of the launch then and suspension setup? Any input would be great. Thanks
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Apr 30, 2004
#2
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #2
For one the RPM II intake will be way too much on a H/C/I setup so I would go with the performer 5.0 or maybe the RPM. I would think the h/c/i would be more streetable but a nice tune with the turbos and you shouldnt have any problems with it. Its all up to you what you want to do... Turbo kits are expencive but will create some nice power.

Who knows why Paul is faster. Maybe his car is a little lighter, has DR's, and suspension upgrades and the Cobra doesnt. Got any idea of what mph the cobra traps in the 1/4? Paul is just one hell of a driver I guess
 
9

95stangGT

Founding Member
Jan 13, 2002
513
0
0
Buffalo, NY
May 1, 2004
#3
  • May 1, 2004
  • #3
Any other opinions?
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
May 1, 2004
#4
  • May 1, 2004
  • #4
well, the 03 cobras are tanks.but at the same time, i think killer did some weight reduction as well. hell, i saw a stock cobra on dr's hit 12.2. killer is one hell of a driver, and so was the cobra driver. from what ive gathered, we have the lighter cars.
 
R

Road_Runna

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2002
594
6
39
Ogden, UT
May 1, 2004
#5
  • May 1, 2004
  • #5
1105 said:
For one the RPM II intake will be way too much on a H/C/I setup so I would go with the performer 5.0 or maybe the RPM. I would think the h/c/i would be more streetable but a nice tune with the turbos and you shouldnt have any problems with it. Its all up to you what you want to do... Turbo kits are expencive but will create some nice
Click to expand...



hey 1105 did you race that 2000 supercharged GT yet?
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
May 1, 2004
#6
  • May 1, 2004
  • #6
oh, i see you want to do the 5 speed swap. Im not trying to sell you anything, but i might be able to help you out in that dept. I think turbo stangs are awesome and another one on the street is great. I can sell you a 5 speed set up for cheap. I wrecked my old 5 speed and EVERYTHING is still in great condition. i messed up the frame pretty badly and it was totalled out. there is about 60k on the tranny. If not, no big deal.
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
May 1, 2004
#7
  • May 1, 2004
  • #7
Road_Runna said:


hey 1105 did you race that 2000 supercharged GT yet?
Click to expand...
it was a 96 GT and not yet... Heard hes having tranny problems. I'm gonna talk to my friend tonight probably.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 1, 2004
#8
  • May 1, 2004
  • #8
95stangGT said:
Now one more question, how are 03 cobras mid 12 sec cars with over 370 RWHP but yet killercanary pulls that off also. Is it all becuase of the launch then and suspension setup? Any input would be great. Thanks
Click to expand...

A couple things to keep in mind when looking at Paul's times at the strip.

One is that he makes a good bit of power under the curve, (high & flat torque dyno numbers) and he is making around 75 rwhp less than the Cobra as you have pointed out.

The other thing is that Paul has been to the strip many, many times and he has worked at his driving skills to be as quick as he is today. It takes time and effort to be good at the strip and I almost forgot, he uses THREE pedels to get the job done.

Later
Grady
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
May 1, 2004
#9
  • May 1, 2004
  • #9
i agree the rpm ii is too much intake for that setup.

i'm a n/a guy, so i recommend the h/c/i. plus, all the other stuff adds up as well in the torque department and the long tubes and prochamber sounds great. even if you decide to go with a blower in the future, all that stuff will just make it that much better too.

if you really want to go with a manual, you might consider selling your aod car and buying a manual car. it is not the most straightforward swap. the expense of buying a manual transmission and getting it installed may be less than the difference between selling your car and buying one that already has a manual tranny (and installing flowmasters). plus the computer would already be configured for the manual.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
617
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
How Many Runs For A Built C-4
  • 93gtmustang
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
743
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
revhead347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
562
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?