• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

How much should I shim my T-5's front bearing retainer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 180 Out
  • Start date Start date Nov 21, 2005
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 21, 2005
#1
  • Nov 21, 2005
  • #1
I'm finally installing a T-5 in my kids' '65 that I bought last June. So yesterday I was shimming the front bearing retainer for correct input shaft preload. With a .036" shim pack, there was no wobble to the input shaft and it there was slight drag when rotating it. With .034" there was still no wobble and there was still some drag, but slightly less than with the .036. With .032" there was the slightest wobble -- you can feel it but you really can't see it -- and much, much less drag.

So which shim pack should I go with? The guy on my Hanlon how-to videotape seems to be saying to zero out the endplay and to have a slight drag on rotation. My problem is I think I have zero endplay with all three packs, and I like the idea of the lighter drag that I get with the .032. Should I go with noticeable drag, and no wobble (.034) or slight drag and slight wobble (.032)? What do you T-5 experts say?
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 22, 2005
#2
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #2
What year car did the T5 come out of ? I'll try and look up the spec for you.
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 22, 2005
#3
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #3
Thanks for the offer. It's from a '95 Mustang GT.
 

Glen's 1965 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2001
477
0
0
Tomball,Texas
Nov 22, 2005
#4
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #4
shim

I would go with the .032 shim then. Don't worry about some wobble. With the 15 roller bearings in the input there should be some. The tip of the input will be in a bearing in the crank for support.
 
N

nmk_61802

Member
May 11, 2005
61
0
7
Nov 22, 2005
#5
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #5
It doesn't sound like you are measuring endplay. My understanding of endplay is the distance that the input shaft could move straight in and out, not side to side. Endplay should be zero. Also, a 95 T5 will not fit into a 65, actually, I shouldn't say that, it will fit, but the longer input shaft and bellhouse will relocate the shifter from it's stock location.

See here for reference:

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/09/t5swap/index.php
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 22, 2005
#6
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #6
Thanks for that link. Lots of good T-5 swap stuff there.

To measure endplay correctly you need to attach a dial indicator to the tailshaft housing. This is most easily accomplished with a magnetic base and a strip of iron or steel bolted to one of the holes for the shifter plate, because there's no ferrous material on the tranny housing itself. You give the tailshaft a whack with a dead blow hammer, then set the indicator on the tailshaft and zero it out. Then you smack the input shaft with your palm; the dial indicator will then show you your endplay.

I don't have a dial indicator, so that's why I'm trying to sneak up on the correct endplay with the .036, .034, and .032 shim packs. That's why I'm asking the question, basically, what do you guys who HAVE used a dial indicator, or who otherwise have a lot of hands on experience with rebuilding T-5's, feel when your endplay is correct. Do you feel noticeable drag with no wobble, or do you feel the slightest wobble and noticeably less drag?

I'm obviously within .004" of perfect, actually plus-or-minus .002", and I'm just trying to figure out which form of perfect is MOST perfect -- really tight, not as tight and no wobble, or noticebly less tight and the slightest wobble. It seems like you can get obsessive beyond all reason with clearances in the range of .002" and parts robust enough to handle 300 lb-ft and 150 mph -- a piece of paper is .004" thick -- but as long as the trans is out of the car and I have the shims to choose from, why not?

As far as running a '95 T-5 in a '65, I'm using the '65 bell with a spacer and a short input shaft. It's my understanding that the cases of the '95 and '93 Mustang T-5's are no different; it's just the bell that's different. So my setup will work.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 23, 2005
#7
  • Nov 23, 2005
  • #7
This information came out of AllData for a 95 mustang with a 5.0 and a manual trans, assembly instruction section. I think they are calling the input shaft the clutch shaft but I could be wrong. I'm rather certain this is what you are looking for. AllData wont let me copy and paste and I'm too lazy to retype it but here is a screen shot:
 

Attachments

  • alldata.webp
    59.7 KB · Views: 428
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 23, 2005
#8
  • Nov 23, 2005
  • #8
Thanks for the attachment.

That's the THIRD method I've seen now, on how to shim the bearing retainer on a T-5. If I follow, you're supposed to turn your tranny on end, with the tail end up, and with the rear seal removed. You rotate both the output shaft and the input shaft. Then you put a dial indicator on the output shaft and zero it. Somehow you pull up on the output shaft and measure the endplay. You take that measurement and ADD .004", and that's your front bearing retainer shim pack, because you need a PRE-load of .001-.004.

Sounds to me like tight is right; that in my case I'd better go with the .034 pack: drag you can feel and NO WOBBLE.

Thanks for the help.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Nov 24, 2005
#9
  • Nov 24, 2005
  • #9
180 Out said:
Thanks for the attachment.

That's the THIRD method I've seen now, on how to shim the bearing retainer on a T-5. If I follow, you're supposed to turn your tranny on end, with the tail end up, and with the rear seal removed. You rotate both the output shaft and the input shaft. Then you put a dial indicator on the output shaft and zero it. Somehow you pull up on the output shaft and measure the endplay. You take that measurement and ADD .004", and that's your front bearing retainer shim pack, because you need a PRE-load of .001-.004.

Sounds to me like tight is right; that in my case I'd better go with the .034 pack: drag you can feel and NO WOBBLE.

Thanks for the help.
Click to expand...
I realize it's a holiday now, but why not call Hanlon Motorsports? You bought their video. I'm sure they would be happy to give you advice. I'd like to hear what they have to say.
 
6

67efivert

Member
Jan 26, 2003
348
0
16
lincolnton nc
Nov 26, 2005
#10
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #10
do u still have the 95 input shaft and is it in good shape if so do u want to sell it let me know thanks
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 27, 2005
#11
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #11
I think I better hang onto it in case I want to go with the late model bell someday.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
946
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
682
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
H
Drivetrain 4R70W clutch friction/metals/piston set up questions for transmission guru
  • Hizdudeness
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
991
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2024
slow84lx
S
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Should I Get a New Clutch Fork and Pivot Ball Stud?
  • AeroCoupe
  • Dec 18, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2022
96pushrod
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?