• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

How much would you pay for this 69 mustang? need advise

  • Thread starter Thread starter fatboyq
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2005
F

fatboyq

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2000
146
0
0
Jun 10, 2005
#1
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #1
check it out and let me know:

http://home.comcast.net/~rsmeacham/69forsale.html

please list pros and cons
 
6

69 Capecod

New Member
Aug 30, 2004
97
0
0
Cape Cod MA.
Jun 10, 2005
#2
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #2
I paid $ 5200. fop mine. Its all in what you think its worth to you tho. If is not what you are looking for dont just settle make sure you get what you want.
 
6

66StangFastback

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
181
0
0
norman, oklahoma
Jun 10, 2005
#3
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #3
id go 10+ at least. It looks to have been restored and looks really good not to mention all the money he has put into mods
 
R

ravenblack67

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
46
0
0
Jun 10, 2005
#4
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #4
Nice car with a lot of money and time invested. Easy $10K as high as $15.
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Jun 10, 2005
#5
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #5
Wasn’t that the car that was on here a couple of months ago that had the cracked shock towers as well as some other problems?
 
6

66StangFastback

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
181
0
0
norman, oklahoma
Jun 10, 2005
#6
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #6
that would be a definate con if it was
 

rangerdoc

New Member
Jun 10, 2005
8
0
0
Jun 10, 2005
#7
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #7
I'd say around 10k mostly for the restoration work. It decodes to just a basic trim 6 cylinder. The mods are never worth what they cost, as I'm sure you already know. Seems to be a nice car overall, but if it had cracked shock towers before I would stay away. Those take some special work to repair correctly and there are too many other cars to choose from that you don't have to worry about that.
 

70vert

New Member
Dec 31, 2004
722
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jun 10, 2005
#8
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #8
I think that Jester was jestering

were you serious, or just jesting?
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Jun 10, 2005
#9
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #9
(Sorry no joke)
I was hoping to jar someone’s memory that has one that works better than mine.
Those photos look familiar from one of the boards. But I can’t remember where. I would check it out before I spend any money.
 

kmterrill

kill joy
Jun 10, 2005
2
1
29
Redford, MI
Jun 10, 2005
#10
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #10
Sorry, I'm partial to fastbacks....
 
6

66StangFastback

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
181
0
0
norman, oklahoma
Jun 11, 2005
#11
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #11
Hold on. Why would the engine compartment and body be as nice as they are as well as the interior, but have cracked shock towers? If someone is going to invest time and money to get the car looking as nice as it does why would they leave it with cracked shock towers? Just a sudden thought.
 
6

66moneypit

Member
Dec 28, 2004
536
0
17
Northern Va
Jun 11, 2005
#12
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #12
66StangFastback said:
Hold on. Why would the engine compartment and body be as nice as they are as well as the interior, but have cracked shock towers? If someone is going to invest time and money to get the car looking as nice as it does why would they leave it with cracked shock towers? Just a sudden thought.
Click to expand...

I doubt they would.... the only plausible scenario for that happening would be that it happened AFTER the restoration. I mean look at what he claims was done...and based on the pics there's not much reason to doubt him. I can't see anyone doing all that work and leaving cracks in the shock towers.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 11, 2005
#13
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #13
i'd stay away from this one, it was originally a six banger with four lug wheels and it still has them on the front along with the six banger drums, no telling what else was done half ass on this car.
 
6

66moneypit

Member
Dec 28, 2004
536
0
17
Northern Va
Jun 11, 2005
#14
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #14
bnickel said:
i'd stay away from this one, it was originally a six banger with four lug wheels and it still has them on the front along with the six banger drums, no telling what else was done half ass on this car.
Click to expand...

Didn't notice that...that's a damn good point though. I don't understand why they'd do all that suspension they claim and not upgrade it to 5 lug.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
FoxBody Gauge Cluster - What would you pay?
  • wildstang17
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
276
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2025
Mustang5L5
R
Suspension Lower control arms needed
  • racer_dave
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
262
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Feb 20, 2026
Noobz347
L
2000 Mustang PATS - Broken Key and Wire - HELP!
  • Laree Taylor
  • May 7, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
214
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 12, 2026
manicmechanic007
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
757
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
  • Sticky
Free Beta Access: Tool I Built to Hunt Fox Bodies Faster
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
514
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?