drakesdad said:Check my bio, TFS track heat h/c/i , bbk shorties,2300 stall,373,s, I'm leaving the stock rims and body the way it is. Have no idea what it will run, have to wait until April to find out
drakesdad said:What do you guys think, stock........
Killercanary said:How's this for a sleeper?
This is my cousin's '94GT which is stock appearing right down to the 4X4 springs. His dyno graph is attached as well, the numbers were made at 6lbs of boost on a very conservative tune and trust me at 6lbs you can not hear the blower at all.
EDIT: These numbers were made with the standard KB inlet, he has since switched to a flowzilla inlet and a home ported GT40 lower intake which should have been good for an additional 40rwhp on average!
well even w/ our *v8's, i don't think they put out enough power to not be considered a sleeper. Paul's cousin's car looks like your average stock gt, probably more so because it doesn't even have a drop. i've seen it happen w/ me and my car--guys in newer gt's, cobras, and 05's revv up next to me 'cause all they see is a stock 94 gt. in my case my car is def not a sleeper, but they assume, since it was stock looking, there were no mods. it would've been nice to have a sleeper and to be able to rip on them for doubting, hehe.moneypit94 said:Anymore i find cars that look fast usually aren't. So the idea of sleepers has kinda gotten a new meaning to it. I think of a sleeper as a car with one tail pipe and v-6 badges or rusted out peices of crap that you laugh at when you see it. Or one of my favorites a beefy big block in a stationwagon. Those are the ultimate sleepers. A v-8 mustang, even stock looking in my opinion is not really a sleeper.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?