• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

hp gains in 331 and 289 motors

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68RustBucket
  • Start date Start date Feb 8, 2004

68RustBucket

New Member
Sep 27, 2003
119
0
0
Linwood, NJ
Feb 8, 2004
#1
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #1
i've been reading up a little on the 331 stroker (from a 289). the main question i have is this; what is the typical gain in HP that people get by installing a 331 stroker from a 289? i realize that's not an easy question to answer, so i'll give you the rest of the specs that will possibly go along with this:

1) Edelbrock Performer RPM intake
2) Tri-y's --> H-pipe
3) Edelbrock 600cfm (1405)
4) Comp Cams 280H cam kit
5) Ported 289 heads (appropriate to intake/exhaust needs)
6) rebuilt C4 w/shift kit --> stock rear, 3:80 gears

that's all i can think of at the moment. i just want to know the HP and torque gains of all that in a '68 289 motor vs. that of a 331 stroked motor.

anymore info on the 331 would be much appreciated, or if you know of any other threads talking about this subject i'd like to be pointed in that direction
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 8, 2004
#2
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #2
the biggest gains are going to be in the amount of torque produced going with the stroker motor. i would say about 30hp is the most you would gain just by changing the stroke. adding performance parts doesnt change things. in other words you get about the same hp and torque increases if you built the 289, then changed to a 331.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Feb 8, 2004
#3
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #3
Well if in a moderate street perfomance build you can get 1:1 or up to 1.2:1 horsepower to cube the difference would be 331-289 = 40-50 HP gain.

The real strength of the stroker in my opinion is two fold
1. Milder idle than same HP level non stroked motor (more of a sleeper appeal)
2. stroker always seem to have a much flatter torque curve than a non-stroked motor putting out equivalent performance peak numbers
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Feb 8, 2004
#4
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #4
top end power won't change much, but low-end torque will climb a ton. relatively, most performance parts will net the same increases. So if you have an identically built 331 and 289 engines, the 331 might put out 350 horses and the 289 325. Adding a set of headers will have similar effects relative to the original power level... ie the 331 might gain 10 horses and the 289 8 or so.

Note these are completely random numbers only there to illustrate the general relationship.
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Feb 8, 2004
#5
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #5
last motor, gt40 crate motor,b-302cam, iron heads,jba headers,holley 750 dp,performer air gap 311 footpounds and 246 rwhp from 302 inchs. new motor afr 185's custom cam, same everything else- 324 footpounds and 343 rwhp from a 331 I was hoping for mor torque
 
N

ncsutp

New Member
Oct 20, 2003
25
0
1
NC
Feb 9, 2004
#6
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #6
check out DSSracing.com. they have the 331 setup in short or long block configurations. they may be a bit pricey, but you get what you pay for. i'm going for the 331 solid roller in my '66 fastback. the tech guys at dss said that with my combination, hp would be 475+...... something to consider.
 

68RustBucket

New Member
Sep 27, 2003
119
0
0
Linwood, NJ
Feb 9, 2004
#7
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #7
that DSS 331 stroker kit is actually a really good price in comparison to other kits i've seen. i'm not sure of the quality of the parts, but if they're as good as they say then the kit should be top quality. it's definately something i'm gonna think about. thanks for the replies everyone
 
D

DJs350H

Founding Member
May 27, 2002
91
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Feb 10, 2004
#8
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #8
Well the power gain depends mostly on the heads, cam, and exhaust you pick; that is where all the power lies. If you're going to spend a bunch of money on a stroker, you're probably serious about making more power, so you might as well take advantage of the extra cubes. Get your heads and intake ported, and pick a good cam, or get one made.

I built a 352 (347 kit with an 0.060 overbore which I don't reccomend...but my engine still doesn't overheat either) stroker out of my 289, got the heads and intake ported and polished, balanced the reciprocating assembly, and put in a custom roller cam with roller rockers. I made a maximum of 562 hp and 454 ft-lb of torque on the engine dyno and an average of 468.3 hp and 409.7 ft-lb above 3000 rpm--that's 1.59 hp per cube on a more thorough build up. I also picked up 60 horsepower on a jet change during the engine dyno tune...food for thought.

DJ
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
923
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
C
331 build power expectations?
  • clayton seiders
  • Sep 5, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 7, 2023
FastDriver
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?