• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Huge Rake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThatKidsNotch
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

tca7291

I can see your wieners.
5 Year Member
Sep 1, 2011
1,801
152
143
Raleigh, NC
Oct 4, 2012
#41
  • Oct 4, 2012
  • #41
Is it just me, or does that spring look like it isn't seating on the control arm correctly?
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Oct 4, 2012
#42
  • Oct 4, 2012
  • #42
gearheadboy said:
What I meant was if its not on jack stands, what is holding it up?
Click to expand...
It was actually resting the inner fenders on the tires, didn't leave it that way. It's all fixed now,. And yeah the geometry is all out of whack but that's more math than I feel like tackling this evening.
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Oct 4, 2012
#43
  • Oct 4, 2012
  • #43
Gearbanger 101 said:
Looks mean though.
Click to expand...
Oh, the meanest. Thinking about a suspension lift for the full 60's funny car look
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
373
124
Phoenix
Oct 4, 2012
#44
  • Oct 4, 2012
  • #44
Those kinda look like front springs to me.
 
Reactions: Cory Berg

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Oct 5, 2012
#45
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #45
If all of your other components check out, as in the bushing aren't in some kind of terrible bind (which you'd notice instantly) I'm going to have to agree. With as low as the car sits in the front compared to the rear I'd say you've got the front springs in the rear and the rears in the front. Doesn't explain why the car sat like it did when you bought it unless those springs were mismatched r out of another vehicle as well. Other than springs, it's kind of hard to screw up the suspension enough for 4x4 stance like that.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 5, 2012
#46
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #46
ThatKidsNotch said:
yea sorry the pics suck...but i cant figure out what it is. Im starting to think its the front end its very very stiff and very low to the ground i cant get any fingers between the fender and tire but it doesnt rub?
Click to expand...
MFE92 said:
Those kinda look like front springs to me.
Click to expand...
Ok....taking bets. Who thinks the front springs were installed on the back and the back on the front?
 
Reactions: gearheadboy and ratio411

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Oct 5, 2012
#47
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #47
1 slightly used cheese puff says the fronts are on the rear. Drives like a dream in reverse
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 5, 2012
#48
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #48
 

Riverart

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2007
171
39
59
Ontario, CA
Oct 5, 2012
#49
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #49
These are mine. See how it tapers at the bottom. I'm not seeing that on yours.
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Oct 5, 2012
#50
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #50

Another example. I'd almost guarantee they're front springs. Simple mistake and easy to fix
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Oct 5, 2012
#51
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #51
The last or bottom coil looks small though. And fat the rest of the way up. Fronts are so much smaller around, and the same size the whole way. Not fronts in rear. I think made for the wrong car, wrong package or wrong part number.
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
373
124
Phoenix
Oct 5, 2012
#52
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #52
n/m
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 5, 2012
#53
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #53
gearheadboy said:
The last or bottom coil looks small though. And fat the rest of the way up. Fronts are so much smaller around, and the same size the whole way. Not fronts in rear. I think made for the wrong car, wrong package or wrong part number.
Click to expand...
Or perhaps wrong year of car? Out of an SN95 or S197 perhaps?

OP...have you got the part number handy?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Oct 5, 2012
#54
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #54
Eibach Pro Kit springs do have about an inch of rake, but that's ridiculous.
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Oct 5, 2012
#55
  • Oct 5, 2012
  • #55
Gearbanger 101 said:
Or perhaps wrong year of car? Out of an SN95 or S197 perhaps?

OP...have you got the part number handy?
Click to expand...
Agreed. I asked him this already. Check the box, invoice, listing, etc.
 

ThatKidsNotch

New Member
Oct 18, 2011
19
0
1
Burlington ma
Oct 7, 2012
#56
  • Oct 7, 2012
  • #56
ok they are the correct springs and the rear springs are on the rear and fronts are on the front... that still would not explain why it had the rake when it was stock.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 7, 2012
#57
  • Oct 7, 2012
  • #57
ThatKidsNotch said:
ok they are the correct springs and the rear springs are on the rear and fronts are on the front... that still would not explain why it had the rake when it was stock.
Click to expand...
Unless the previous owner had his in wrong and you just followed suit when you replaced them?

Has the car ever had any rear end damage? Any evidence of an accident?
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
373
124
Phoenix
Oct 7, 2012
#58
  • Oct 7, 2012
  • #58
Correct springs, located correctly, nothing else wrong with the car, yet huge rake. Well then, the answer is obvious: Fairy dust in the headliner.
 
Reactions: Cory Berg and ratio411

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Oct 7, 2012
#59
  • Oct 7, 2012
  • #59
Well obviously it had some bogus springs in it when you bought it. No question. They were the wrong springs, prolly sn95 or something. After all your checks it appears that as MFE92 stated way earlier, you need to cut your springs. They actually don't look way off in comparison to stock, especially if the front was up where it should be. Being its a coupe, the fronts are low and the Eibachs run long according to MFE92's experience, I'd say you just have all the right combo for RAKE. Pull them cut a coil or 1.5 coils and reinstall.
 

1993SSP

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2001
1,194
0
37
Ky
Oct 7, 2012
#60
  • Oct 7, 2012
  • #60
Make sure the bottom pigtail end on the rear coil points towards the driver side on both springs, this is the correct orientation for the rear springs, removing the isolators will drop the car some, but for a set of lowering springs that car still appears to sit high in the back

you can try cutting the coils, I'd start with half a coil, I recently lowered a 94 silverado and the front was off, ended up cutting 1/2 coil on one side and it leveled the truck out, no 2 vehicles are the same and there is always some fine tuning to do when lowering suspensions , or at least that has been my experience in the past
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
224
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
403
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 3, 2026
squeak93
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
584
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
845
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?