• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Hydrocarbons.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter my66coupe
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2005
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
May 16, 2005
#1
  • May 16, 2005
  • #1
Not for the stang....shes exempt. I recently bought a 75 Rv with a 360 dodge engine in it that failed today. All was fine except for the hydrocarbon reading at idle. I readjusted my mixture screws, and the idle cleared up a ton. Wouldnt even idle before. Anything else I can do to ensure i dont fail again? thanks guys

Mike
 
1

1965pony

New Member
Apr 17, 2005
37
0
0
Nor Cal
May 16, 2005
#2
  • May 16, 2005
  • #2
smog

Hi Mike,
Well HC is a product of a misfire, basicaly unburnt gas.
Check your plugs and wires, make sure the plugs aren't fuel fouled.
Make sure the engine runs smooth with no misfire.
If your engine has sat for a long time change the oil and give it a good long highway test drive right before your test.
Depending on the GVWR you might not have a catalytic convertor so that could be a problem if you do. Vince
 
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
May 17, 2005
#3
  • May 17, 2005
  • #3
Engine is running smooth now. Oil has been changed, and has seen pleanty of highway time. It does see some on the way to test center. I will pull the plugs and check for fouling ect. No cats on this rig. Thanks

Mike
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 17, 2005
#4
  • May 17, 2005
  • #4
also look for vacuum leaks as they will cause a slight misfire that will run the hc levels up. while you are at it, check the choke for proper operation and replace the airfilter.
 
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
May 18, 2005
#5
  • May 18, 2005
  • #5
Failed again today.....Air filter has pleanty of life in it....All vacumm connections have seen better days but when sprayed with starter fluid I get no response from the engine. I adjusted the timing for a smoother idle, idle mixture was set....hopefully with the adjusted timing....ill be able to pass. All reading were good except for idle hydrocarbons.....gah! Any thoughs on the addative that is guaranteed to get you to pass?? thanks guys

Mike
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
May 19, 2005
#6
  • May 19, 2005
  • #6
What are the readings and what is the limit?
 

2nd Mustang

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
2,488
0
46
Southern California
May 19, 2005
#7
  • May 19, 2005
  • #7
I used to have to get my off road bugs to pass a sniffer test in the old days. I don't know about hydro carbons at idle, but I used to lean out the carb mixture, retard the timing and loosen the carb to intake manifold bolts (to draw in more air). It idle like crap but it passed the smog test. In our old company vans, the mechanics had to make them pass the smog tests, so they did the same thing, retard the timing and lean out the carbs.
 
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
May 19, 2005
#8
  • May 19, 2005
  • #8
Soo if I lean out the carb, retard the timing, loosen up the carb, and probalby remove the air cleaner all together ( all of this will be done right before the test and put back right after), and it runs like crap but passes hydrocarbons at idle, Will it still pass Carbon monoxide levels at speed or idle?. I dont know if they do this in other states, but they had the car roll onto these dyno rollers, and ran it up to a speed (65-70) where it blew hard enough for the computer to get a good reading. All levels pass well below the minimum, minus hydrocarbons. The reading was a 652 out of 350. Im going to try all of the above, if it doesnt work, I will try the addatives. We shall see. thanks guys

Mike
 

2nd Mustang

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
2,488
0
46
Southern California
May 19, 2005
#9
  • May 19, 2005
  • #9
my66coupe said:
.....but they had the car roll onto these dyno rollers, and ran it up to a speed (65-70) where it blew hard enough for the computer to get a good reading.

Mike
Click to expand...

When I did those things, all that was required at the time was a sniffer wand shoved up the tail pipe, no rollers or dynos. I haven't gone through a smog test in a few years now because of my old 67 coupe and new truck which doesn't require a smog test till it's 5 years old. I just remember my car just barely being able to idle at the smog test station and after the test I literally drove it around the block and did a tune up by ear to get it to run well enough to get home.
 

2nd Mustang

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
2,488
0
46
Southern California
May 19, 2005
#10
  • May 19, 2005
  • #10
Okay, just asked my son about this, he's an enviromental chemist, and he said that to reduce hydro carbon emissions (after a bunch of chemical mumbo jumbo of which I didn't understand anything he said) yes, introducing more air into the air/fuel mixture should help burn the hydro carbons more. He said that excessive hydro carbon readings indicate that the gas isn't being burnt completely, so more air may help. Good luck.
 
1

1965pony

New Member
Apr 17, 2005
37
0
0
Nor Cal
May 20, 2005
#11
  • May 20, 2005
  • #11
smog

Hi Mike,
Well the thing is you can mess with the timing but it still has to be with in a certain spec. I think its 8' BTDC on yours. Also don't go to lean or you will cause a lean misfire that will raise your HC levels. Your best bet is to take it to a tuner...you might have hard to diagnose issues that is causing the grief. ie carbon on the valves, intake leak, EVAP system, EGR valve or carb problems. Your not running an AFB still? Please tell me its not a thermo quad. Vince
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
May 20, 2005
#12
  • May 20, 2005
  • #12
I have had good luck with "guaranteed to pass". Comes in a white bottle, put it in, with a full tank, drive it till its at or below 1/4 and then take it to test.

Dave-
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
May 20, 2005
#13
  • May 20, 2005
  • #13
Some basics:
High CO is caused by rich air/fuel ratios, but still shows that the fuel is being burned. HC is raw fuel, i.e. the gas sitting in your tank is HC. NOx is how hot the fuel/air mixture is burning. All things equal, the engine with higher compression will have higher NOx readings. If CO gets too low (too lean) then you start misfiring and HC and NOx shoots up. Too rich and your CO shoots up until the point where your plugs start fouling. Fouling means misfire, misfire means unburnt fuel, HC readings go up and since fuel has a cooling effect, NOx goes down. If your NOx and CO are within reason something is preventing all your fuel from igniting.

With that out of the way...
More air won't help if it gets so lean that it causes a lean misfire. Misfires, even inaudible ones, will shoot your HC readings sky-high. 350ppm at idle? That's a tough one especially with no cats. 650ppm is pretty high and sounds like there is a vacuum leak and/or a slight misfire. Removing the air filter element may help but not much unless the filter is really clogged. I'd do a resistance check on the plug wires, clean the rotor/cap contacts (maybe replace altogether) and replace the plugs. If either electrodes on the plugs are rounded off in any way the spark won't be as intense, as sparks like to jump to and from sharp edges. Speaking of plugs, did you check the gap? Try a slightly smaller gap than stock to make it easier for the plug to fire, for example .045 instead of .051.

Try a fuel system cleaner such as the Chevron Techron in a bottle. Also, the chambers, valves, runners, and whatever else is in the intake path might have enough carbon deposits to soak fuel instead of burning it. Give it a few good blasts down the highway in a lower gear (3rd instead of overdrive). Don't give it full-throttle under-load runs as you might soak the carbon with more fuel and raise your HC readings.

Good luck. My 5.0 failed the idle test two years ago but since then it's been in the shop and painted. I'm going to re-smog it and we don't have idle tests anymore. I'm hoping it'll pass this time.
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
May 20, 2005
#14
  • May 20, 2005
  • #14
all i have to say is good thing i live in florida where we dont have to do those stupid tests...hhahaha
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
May 20, 2005
#15
  • May 20, 2005
  • #15
Loosening the carb bolts can make the problem a whole lot worse if it is a non-holley type carb, as the fuel can bypass the idle circuit and go directly into the manifold causing a rich situation. My new edelbrock had that problem, and after tightening flew through testing.

We have to test annually here and it can be a real game at times. Adding a litre of methyl hydrate to the fuel helps it burn more completely as well as gets rid of any water that may have condensed in the tank (which can also lead to poor combustion).

Just a little info here - With no cats, an edelbrock 600, headers, pertronix, and accel wires (basically nothing special) my hydrocarbon reading is 212 ppm out of an allowable 885 ppm at idle. CO is .14% out of an allowable 4.19%.

Earlier that day my hydrocarbons were pegged at 2000 ppm just because of the minor vacuum leak around the base of the carb.
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
May 20, 2005
#16
  • May 20, 2005
  • #16
krash kendall said:
Loosening the carb bolts can make the problem a whole lot worse if it is a non-holley type carb, as the fuel can bypass the idle circuit and go directly into the manifold causing a rich situation. My new edelbrock had that problem, and after tightening flew through testing.
Click to expand...

You most likely had a lean misfire.
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
May 20, 2005
#17
  • May 20, 2005
  • #17
No. If you turned the idle screws in the engine would idle happily along as if you did nothing as it was still getting plenty of fuel. After cinching it down (I have a 1" spacer which equals double the mating surfaces) you could stop the engine with the screws.
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
May 20, 2005
#18
  • May 20, 2005
  • #18
Sorry, I'm not saying it wasn't running lean at that point, I'm just saying that a poor seal at the carb gastket can cause raw fuel to enter the system unregulated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Odd idle creep issue
  • sav22rem22
  • Apr 5, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 10, 2021
sav22rem22
Engine Cam idle and timing questions - big cam, little knowledge
  • Justin87
  • Jul 6, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2021
Middleagecrisis
M
A
Engine Turbo 5.0 Mustang bad misfire at WOT
  • AwxyMoron
  • Apr 3, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2021
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?