• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

I Have 500$ to spend on speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter AntiRice98
  • Start date Start date Dec 6, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Dec 7, 2005
#21
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #21
You don't neeed heads for a PI swap. The cams and intake is what nets most of the hp. The heads will get you 5-10rwhp due to the increase in compression. The NPI heads can be used which have a better quench pad and burn faster than the PI heads. Granted the exhaust side of it can use some work. The money you use for heads can be used to port the NPI's and you can still use the PI cams. Plus this will make more hp than if you went with PI heads anyways.

Some people have had great success with NPI heads. Johnny L is running 12.3's with his NPI headed motor in a T bird.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Dec 7, 2005
#22
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #22
don't get this argument. PI heads in stock form make more power. PI heads in ported form make more power.

Why would you go with a non-pi head. there are people running 12.3 on stock pi heads.

bottom line to me is you couldproably find heads, cams, intake for $500. there is more power there and it is an easy job.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Dec 7, 2005
#23
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #23
I am not going to argue, I am offering info. Like I said Johnny L has gone 12.3 with NA NPI head 2V in his T Bird.

Actually unless it is a real race setup, ported PI's will not be noticed over poerted NPI's. Why? You have too much airflow for those PI cams and they can't be used to their full potential and you will lose some torque due to the loss in velocity. Ported NPI's can still work with PI cams. Chances are you will have to go with an aftermarket cam at a stage 2 or 3 depending on the port job with PI's. Once you start going with a/m cams you are starting to get away from a pi swap and more into a race engine design.

The NPI's are better in a NA setup when ported. Plus their port designs are better. Better quench pad too.

Why would I go with a NPI? Because the money I save can be used for something else like porting the stock NPI heads and make use of them and getting roughly the same hp as the PI's.

Too many people are on the pi head bandwagon when people have made the same power on NA street applications with a NPI head. Many people are quick to say then port the PI heads with an oem cam. Come on now.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Dec 7, 2005
#24
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #24
I know what you are saying I have read the threads I just know me from an easy install standpoint would do the PI topend. I will take the extra compression if I am n/a. no gasket issues etc to fight. that is just me though.

I still have seen PI cars go 10's have not seen Npi cars go tens.

I do get your point though.
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Dec 7, 2005
#25
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #25
I guess I'm the only one who thought he was talking about drugs by that title.

I vote PI stuff!
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Dec 7, 2005
#26
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #26
The PI's are better for a race application and a FI application too. NPI's do have their limits, but do make a good street combo.
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Dec 7, 2005
#27
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #27
Mossberg said:
I guess I'm the only one who thought he was talking about drugs by that title.

I vote PI stuff!
Click to expand...

First thing I thought of too does that make me a bad person?

 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Saying Hi
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
294
The Welcome Wagon Dec 21, 2025
BriansNSane
B
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
306
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
J
66 Fastback with 302 stroker. I have center link Borgeson issues Please advise
  • Joe Johnston
  • Sep 16, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
275
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 17, 2024
Joe Johnston
J
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
727
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
D
Exhaust Bbk mid pipe and flowmaster catback fitment issues?
  • dqureshi06
  • Jun 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2024
dqureshi06
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?