• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

I have the worlds slowest fox body

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox04
  • Start date Start date Apr 23, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Apr 26, 2012
#41
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #41
fiveohwblow said:
Mine isn't theoretical or hypothetical. It's been done so many times I couldn't count that high. I have seen it done many times with my friends cars and watched them go down the track. If someone bought a tf top end kit brand new for 2500, what are you willing to pay for it used????

I don't even have a wideband or half the **** you guys claim is necessary. How many factory boosted cars do???

My car nor these other cars I've ridden
In, worked on and seem make 12 second passes are bombs or 1/4 mile specific. Read my posts again. They were street trim. As is mine. I have AC, power windows, locks, mirrors etc etc thus showing you I know what street trim is. And for that matter, my 88 GT I bought factory had no AC or power windows, thus also meaning street trim doesn't necessitate those.

Lastly, he's owned 4 stangs. If Hes owned Legos and 4 stangs he has the skills to put a top end kit on. It's not rocket science.
Click to expand...
Dude, I wasn't coming at you. If you have personal experience with this subject then I take your word for it. I have personal experience dictating the opposite. If you're saying that you can take a bone stock average condition Fox and go 12s with less than $2,000 then you gets mad respect...from me at least.

And by street legal/streetable/track worthy I'm talking about building a car with creature comforts that will be reliable every day. So I'm sure you can skip out on a FPR or an AFR gauge or a fuel pressure gauge...or have a boosted engine with no vacuum/boost gauge for that matter...still tho, that car will not be the most reliable. I wouldn't drive that car for more than 5 minutes around town. I mean how could you consider a modded forced induction or N/A engine to be reliable when you have no idea how much boost you're making, if there's a vacuum issue, how much pressure you fuel injectors are getting, how lean you're running, etc. You can't just skip out on these things and talk about 12 second passes for less than $2000.

What I'm saying is that your estimate is like when MM&FF says they can build a 600 hp engine for less than x amount of money. They don't factor in a lot of things that quickly add up. Little odds and ends, tools, etc. There are soo many things that can turn a small budget project into a relatively costly one. That's all I'm sayin...but again, I'm not coming at you. Everyone has their own idea of a budget build. I just feel that a budget 12 second budget build should still include everything necessary to make the car reliable and keep you aware of the engines overall condition.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Apr 26, 2012
#42
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #42
Three50won said:
Dude, I wasn't coming at you. If you have personal experience with this subject then I take your word for it. I have personal experience dictating the opposite. If you're saying that you can take a bone stock average condition Fox and go 12s with less than $2,000 then you gets mad respect...from me at least.

And by street legal/streetable/track worthy I'm talking about building a car with creature comforts that will be reliable every day. So I'm sure you can skip out on a FPR or an AFR gauge or a fuel pressure gauge...or have a boosted engine with no vacuum/boost gauge for that matter...still tho, that car will not be the most reliable. I wouldn't drive that car for more than 5 minutes around town. I mean how could you consider a modded forced induction or N/A engine to be reliable when you have no idea how much boost you're making, if there's a vacuum issue, how much pressure you fuel injectors are getting, how lean you're running, etc. You can't just skip out on these things and talk about 12 second passes for less than $2000.

What I'm saying is that your estimate is like when MM&FF says they can build a 600 hp engine for less than x amount of money. They don't factor in a lot of things that quickly add up. Little odds and ends, tools, etc. There are soo many things that can turn a small budget project into a relatively costly one. That's all I'm sayin...but again, I'm not coming at you. Everyone has their own idea of a budget build. I just feel that a budget 12 second budget build should still include everything necessary to make the car reliable and keep you aware of the engines overall condition.
Click to expand...
I am not coming at you or anyone else for that matter either. What I am saying is TO THE OP, getting a top end kit used on top of what he has is less than 2k and will warrant 12's all day long. It is situationally specific.

Help me understand something though, are you saying a top end kit makes a car unreliable?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 26, 2012
#43
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #43
1. Nobody in this hobby is both broke and skill-less. You don't get to be both and still play. So either let go of the budget argument or the cost of labor argument.

2. You make that car out to be a ticking time bomb, but IIRC he later put an enormous procharger on it and ran 10s. If it did that, 12s were a walk in the park.

3. 12.9 still counts as 12s. When guys in the new Coyotes are running 12.9s, nobody's pissing and moaning "barely".

4. With a calibrated meter you really can get away with a lot without a tune. My car is even an extreme example, and though I do want to tune ot to get the most out of it, I have a few thousand miles on the new motor, a handful of 1/4 mile passes, no tune,and no real significant issues.

FWIW, over the years I have built an entire suspension for my car, transmission, brakes, engine, rear end, etc etc. No welder, no bender, no lift, and a lot of that was done in a 1 car garage. In fact, I rebuilt the rear end and put 3.73s in it literally on a kitchen table. If you guys think what Sharad did to his car was a lot of work, you're crazy.
 
Reactions: Sharad

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Apr 26, 2012
#44
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #44
SSeater is crazy.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Apr 26, 2012
#45
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #45
I should've gotten a Z28.... Just kiddin, sorta...
 
Reactions: Three50won

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Apr 26, 2012
#46
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #46
For the record, my first set of heads was gt40y aluminum heads.
Not the worlds best, but far better than stock.
The guy i sold them to made 274rwhp with an e cam and gt40 intake.
I bought them NIB on the internet, a place where they had 100's of sets, $699.

Gt40x can be had cheap, which was also on a friends lx with an e cam and gt40 tubular intake. Went 11.98@116 full weight.

It only takes about 250rwhp on one of these cars to run 12's, can even be done on a gt40p budget.

Twisted wedges are on sale frequently at $999, so $700 used isn't unreasonable.
I've even turned down sets of gt40x's at $500, because i really didn't have anything to put them on.

About the only set you can't get at a decent price is the afr 165's.
 

v8stang289

15 Year Member
Apr 22, 2008
136
116
74
Apr 26, 2012
#47
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #47
A good friend of mine has a 90 lx hatch that runs 12.90's. It has:
a stock 96 explorer motor with a B-cam,
performer efi intake,
explorer TB and 70mm MAF,
BBK longtubes and H-pipe into dumped flowmasters,
T-5 (with 2.95 1st),
3.73 gears with 31 spline trak-lok unit with carbon fiber clutches,
subframe connectors ,
stock rear control arms,
A9L computer

He launches at 4k on 26" slicks and cuts 1.60's 60 ft times and shifts between 5500-6000
runs 12.90's on the slicks and 13.40's on street tires.

I don't know if his car is a freak or what, but it's a relatively simple combo that wasn't expensive and consistently runs 12.90's.

ETA: this is a full weight car with stock seats, A/C, power steering, and all carpet. Only thing removed is the smog pump and related stuff.
 

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Apr 26, 2012
#48
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #48
fiveohwblow said:
Help me understand something though, are you saying a top end kit makes a car unreliable?
Click to expand...
Not saying that at all. I'm just saying that some method of tuning has to be available to me personally. If not then I consider it unreliable. Some people are fine with just buying mods and installing them and driving off. Me, I need to know something about what the engine/ECU is doing...at the very least fuel pressure and vacuum. I mean, how many "HELP" posts are out there concerning fuel or vacuum issues? These kids have all these mods but the engine has a problem and they can't tell you if it's related to fuel pressure, spark, vacuum, or anything. Which is why I say that a set-up with just HCI and stuff is incomplete. I would never run a S/C without a boost gauge. And I would never install aftermarket heads and cams without monitoring and adjusting the fuel trims and spark. And all the more so if the car were my DD or even a second car. I have 3 cars. I barely drive my 95 GT...but if I get in it and the fuel pressure gauge isn't working then I would hesitate to even start the car. God forbid I'm laying into the thing and it decides to go lean on me at WOT. That's just my opinion tho.
 

fox04

Member
Mar 6, 2011
78
1
6
augusta, ga
Apr 26, 2012
#49
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #49
Guys I don't really care what it takes to get into the 12s. Be had a hci fox before with canfield 190s, e cam and edelbrock intake tht went 12.7s with a slipping clutch an syncos gone in 3rd so I k ow its really not tht hard. Yes I have the knowledge and tools to do just abt anything. I need or want to do. But like I said before I bought this car for a motor swap project. I was just trying to have a little fun till. I start the swap. I'm doin a 5.3 ls swap with a ms3 cam and nitrous.
 

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Apr 26, 2012
#50
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #50
NIKwoaC said:
1. Nobody in this hobby is both broke and skill-less. You don't get to be both and still play. So either let go of the budget argument or the cost of labor argument.

2. You make that car out to be a ticking time bomb, but IIRC he later put an enormous procharger on it and ran 10s. If it did that, 12s were a walk in the park.
Click to expand...
My bad if I seemed like I was making his car out to be a bomb. Not saying his (or anyone's) car is a bomb. I'm just saying that sometimes people are only interested in running a specific time on a budget and so they don't waste money on certain items. I'm saying that in the case of Sharad, this wasn't his everyday car. There was a specific purpose for that car. The OP (and the majority of others) is in a different boat. Can a Fox run 12s on a stock engine? Sure. For less than $2,000? Sure, if you can do most of the labor and strip a lot of stuff out. Can it do so for less than $2,000 on a stock engine and get you to and from school or work and around town reliably and somewhat comfortably? Well that depends on what your idea of reliability and comfort is. And IMO, I'd say no it can't (as far as my idea of reliability and comfort is concerned)...not for less than $2,000.
 

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Apr 26, 2012
#51
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #51
90lxwhite said:
I should've gotten a Z28.... Just kiddin, sorta...
Click to expand...
Which year would you get...??
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Apr 26, 2012
#52
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #52
Hey fellas, how bout this for sad well sadish... We're arguing about a 12 second pass. Damn ford and their low hp motors until recent years. I guess though the old adage still stands true: there's no replacement for displacement. When you're starting from 200 and some odd hp you have a lot of ground to cover. I have one more adage and I'll leave yall with this, "how fast do you wanna go, how much money you got?"
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Apr 26, 2012
#53
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #53
as far as getting a Z28, ohh I dunno the '94 and '95 models came stock with like 275 hp at the motor but I bet you couldn't find one that wasn't junked out and the '00's had like 305 hp and they'd be prob be rattle traps too now days . They were fast but uncomfortable as a 'b' with their crap little seats having to look up over the long ass dash. The formulas and TA's were sexy but same kind of ride situation. That being said, they'd be fun to hotrod around but probably tough to live with. Kinda like a supermodel as a girlfriend.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Apr 26, 2012
#54
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #54
Ford finally got off their ass and made a motor that made some power in the last year or two but you're looking at close to $40k for a gt. Ridiculous
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Apr 26, 2012
#55
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #55
I know I said I was done but one more thing; let's agree to disagree, one can make his fox run fast on the cheap (allegedly) but for the average joe you're gonna spend as much or more on parts and labor as you did for the car.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Apr 26, 2012
#56
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #56
01-02 z28 would prolly be the best bang for the buck
. Lid and exhaust would yield 12s with a good driver and oddly enough even at today's prices that's right at an explorer combo and slicks which would put a good driver and a fox into 12s. I used to have an ls1 z28 and it was overall the better car but strictly speaking with a 2k , hell even z 1000 dollar budget thectwo would be damn close in the 1/4.
 

speedtrip

Member
May 22, 2005
93
5
9
Jerkwater, U.S.A
Apr 26, 2012
#57
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #57
90lxwhite said:
kinda sad but takes quite a bit of dough to get a foxbody in the 12's huh
Click to expand...
Not really my fox got 13.06 @105 back in the 90s. Stock engine Stock 3 08 gears. I added cobra intake, cobra 1.7 roller rockers, 65 mm tb, kn filter, homemade cai, shorty headers, slicks and 5 k launch. What does your car weigh? My 1987 lx weighs 2850 without me.
 
Reactions: Sharad

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Apr 26, 2012
#58
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #58
speedtrip said:
Not really my fox got 13.06 @105 back in the 90s. Stock engine Stock 3 08 gears. I added cobra intake, cobra 1.7 roller rockers, 65 mm tb, kn filter, homemade cai, shorty headers, slicks and 5 k launch. What does your car weigh? My 1987 lx weighs 2850 without me.
Click to expand...
Hahaha, uh oh...
 

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Apr 26, 2012
#59
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #59
90lxwhite said:
Ford finally got off their ass and made a motor that made some power in the last year or two but you're looking at close to $40k for a gt. Ridiculous
Click to expand...
The 11 GTs brand new were around $32K-$35K. The prices now are in the $26K range depending on mileage. Some of the dealerships out there are acting like they're sitting on gold tho. I was shopping for a Coyote about a month ago and found some high mileage cars that the dealers just would not come down on.
 

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Apr 26, 2012
#60
  • Apr 26, 2012
  • #60
90lxwhite said:
as far as getting a Z28, ohh I dunno the '94 and '95 models came stock with like 275 hp at the motor but I bet you couldn't find one that wasn't junked out and the '00's had like 305 hp and they'd be prob be rattle traps too now days . They were fast but uncomfortable as a 'b' with their crap little seats having to look up over the long ass dash. The formulas and TA's were sexy but same kind of ride situation. That being said, they'd be fun to hotrod around but probably tough to live with. Kinda like a supermodel as a girlfriend.
Click to expand...
Yea they were uncomfortable...even more so for the passenger. The hump in the floor on the passenger side is an unforgiveable sin from Chevy...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Turning over fresh 347 stroker torque question
  • TexxDex
  • Apr 1, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2024
Bullitt347
M
Electrical 92 GT 306 Vortech - Did I fry my ECU???
  • Mrg2783
  • Apr 15, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 16, 2018
Mrg2783
M
S
Fox Wont Start And Cant Figure It Out
  • smigstang
  • Feb 1, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 5, 2016
smigstang
S
I Need Help... Fox Body Jerks And Stutters
  • Mccarbre
  • Apr 9, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 20, 2016
Mccarbre
S
back to the fox world..
  • salinas86
  • Jun 7, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
449
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 7, 2011
salinas86
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?