• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

I need a good radar detector

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1slicksnake
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

Mustang_02

Member
Jan 26, 2004
113
0
17
Jun 30, 2004
#61
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #61
Uncle Meat said:
Lawman85 - Don't worry about az_r2d1... There are PLENTY of us who support you and the job you are doing.

U.M.
Click to expand...


My Dad and Sister are Police officers. It's not an easy job to do.
Az Try respecting someone for once. Lawman85, keep up the good work. I have enjoyed reading everything you have said on Radar and Laser.
 

GrayCobra

New Member
Jun 23, 2004
47
0
0
DFW, TX
Jun 30, 2004
#62
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #62
98 Yeller SVT

Stop flamin' Lawman85.

This thread was supposed to be about Radar Detectors, not attitude adjustments. I respect these public servants and their jobs can be incredibly tough. Of course there are some bad apples in the barrel, but it's a really big barrel and you shouldn't paint each one of them as being good for nuthin's.

I also went to those three sites you had a hyperlink to. Each one has well thought out responses to what does and does not work. I do have a tendency to respect test data results more than personal opinions. Being one who deals with graphs and test equipment on a regular basis it seems that the better detectors do a pretty decent job of it.

When I worte my initial response (about 2 pages ago) to Radar Detectors and what they do/don't do, I was speaking from a Military Radar/Laser Applications Perspective. After talking to several of my counterparts in the field I would grudgingly agree that Automotive Radar Detectors do serve a purpose. And, that purpose is not grossly unjustifiable. Otherwise the State Supreme Court(s) in each state would have made their use illegal. In fact I do use one, and whenever it does it's 'thing' I feel a little better about not having to pay a larger insurance premium or court official for exceeding the posted limits.

As for Lasers and LD Jammers that's a load of money to spend on something that is not used in my area. I suppose one will become a necessity if/when it does arrive here. But, all that to travel a little faster?

Now, can we get back to which Radar Detector is best one for your neck o' the woods?
 

CrimsonCobra_01

New Member
Oct 7, 2003
125
0
0
Chi Town
Jun 30, 2004
#63
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #63
okay, back to the original topic.. i got the passport escort 8500 and have nothing but good things to say about it. i hear the only thing that comes close to its accuracy is the valintine but thats just from magazines.
 
H

hankd

Founding Member
Jan 10, 2002
162
0
0
Jun 30, 2004
#64
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #64
CrimsonCobra_01 said:
okay, back to the original topic.. i got the passport escort 8500 and have nothing but good things to say about it. i hear the only thing that comes close to its accuracy is the valintine but thats just from magazines.
Click to expand...

Not true. The Bel's are good too. I used a Bel 985 for a while, now using a 940...same unit minus a few features. Range and filtering are unchanged. Who cares about a voltage readout for my car

Range is pretty much a wash between the V1, Passport 8500 (and Solo S2), and Bel's. I've picked up K band at 4 miles with a Bel 985, Escort Solo S2, and V1...plenty of warning. The decision from there depends on what you want to spend and what features YOU like.

The Bel's seem to be the best at limiting "false" hits thanks to AutoScan mode, which eliminates all weak signals. (affects range slightly...I use it in the city only)

The V1 has the arrows / counter on it's side. Tends to pick-up for falses.

The 8500 is a good all around unit. Will false a little more than the Bel and can track multiple hits, but no arrows like the V1.

I'm sticking with Bel's for my money. I'll probably get a new V1 when a new version comes out though. I recently sold both of my V1's while they were still the latest versions...

Last week I had 10 radar detectors...I think I have about 7 right now? Not sure...
 

COBRA90GT

Mustang Master
Sep 22, 2001
6,654
0
87
HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
Jun 30, 2004
#65
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #65
GrayCobra said:
...This thread was supposed to be about Radar Detectors, not attitude adjustments....

...Now, can we get back to which Radar Detector is best one for your neck o' the woods? ...
Click to expand...



I strongly suggest everyone (*esp the newbies*) heed GrayCobra's advice...if you wish to flame or troll, you'll have to go elsewhere.
 

Lawman85

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2001
126
0
0
Jun 30, 2004
#66
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #66
hankd said:
Last week I had 10 radar detectors...I think I have about 7 right now? Not sure...
Click to expand...


Wow, how do you see out of your windshield?
 
H

hankd

Founding Member
Jan 10, 2002
162
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#67
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #67
Lawman85 said:
Wow, how do you see out of your windshield?
Click to expand...

LOL...it's tricky...

Nah, I've just been buying / selling used ones so I can try out different models...
 

GrayCobra

New Member
Jun 23, 2004
47
0
0
DFW, TX
Jul 1, 2004
#68
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #68
COBRA90GT Hooaaah! (Soldier talk for you are the man!)
 
C

CT Cobra

New Member
May 14, 2004
1
0
0
Rowayton
Jul 2, 2004
#69
  • Jul 2, 2004
  • #69
At least you guys can speed. I'm in fairfield county CT, a suburb of NYC, I'm lucky to get to 55. I don't have a detector and most of the time don't need one. On the rare ride on 95 I can do 70 the troopers don't care much as long as your not weaving in and out of traffic.
 
A

az_r2d1

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
30
0
0
Jul 2, 2004
#70
  • Jul 2, 2004
  • #70
woomaster said:
Let me know how it works out, too bad you aren't here in Illinois, we could test it on a couple of different guns.

On another note....I'm sure everyone knows where the national 55mph speed limit came from right? No? We, for those who don't, it came from the 1973/74 oil embargo. We needed to "conserve" fuel. So we did, however, when the local and county municipalities started generating enormous amounts of money for the local departments, the concept of "speed kills'" was born. The federal government also decided to withhold interstate highway funds from the states that decided to raise speed limits above 55mph. Funny thing happened though, in states that did raise speed limits to 75mph, their fatality rates DECLINED. Overall with states between 65mph-75mph, the fatality rate fell 12%. In states with the highest speed limits, 75mph, theirs fell the most:
Arizona: -21.1%
Nevada: -23.7%
Utah: -27.7%

Speed kills.....BS
Click to expand...

I will let you know. I am in Arizona and I agree on your statement. Speed does not kill. Excessive speeding at bad times does. I feel very safe driving 90mph down the interstate when there isnt' too much traffic around. (yes, that still happens here)
And , I am not the only one. There is a steady flow of cars doing 80 to 90 mph and it's quite alright.
People think 90 mph is fast, try driving on the autobahn. I have quite a few hours of driving the bahn behind me, and they laugh at 90mph.
Last May I was doing about 100mph near munich and I wasn't even the fastest out there. People fly by you at 150mph. Accidents ? not really. Only time it happens is when the weather is bad or when there's too much traffic. Other times it's perfectly safe.

Cops just need to be reasonable. Clocking people when the roads is empty is pure money-making. I understand if it's rush hour and some maniac is zig-zagging thru traffic to get pulled over, but this cr*p ? no.

The cop-dude thinks they don't work (detectors) I say they do. How does he know anyways, he can't tell the ones that DID notice him on time, and DID slow down.
I have great experiences with them, and it will be even better once the Lidatek is in.
 

cerp

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
70
0
0
Jul 4, 2004
#71
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #71
very good thread.

double post
 

cerp

New Member
Mar 14, 2004
70
0
0
Jul 4, 2004
#72
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #72
very good thread.

well just my 2 cents
Lawman85 thanks for telling us all this information I find it very useful.

I think detectors are a must have, anyways I have the same one I bought back in 1990 and it works great I slow down every time I get a real or false signal; thus making it a habit to slow down because speed is addicting.


and I still think insurance rates are .
 
B

bigred111

New Member
Mar 21, 2004
11
0
0
Jul 6, 2004
#73
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #73
wow now im going to really trust my local cops if i ever get pulled over ill be like hey can u really be sure one of your fellow officers clocked a street light at 180??????
lol
 
D

dkscobra2003

New Member
Dec 1, 2002
6
0
0
Stationed @ Andrews AFB, NJ originally from Ann Ar
Jul 6, 2004
#74
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #74
8500 (x50) BLUE

Escort 8500 x50 is the way to go. I had the 8500 sold it for the new x50. It is great.
 
1

11B2V_Mike

New Member
Oct 6, 2003
9
0
0
Jul 6, 2004
#75
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #75
My .02 on Radar Det.

I live in Dallas, TX so all info herein pertains to my location. (long post warning)

#1. I have owned a few radar detectors starting with the cheapies on up to Val 1.8 (now). They are like a tool, as someone else stated earlier. on long streches use it to maybe catch an overshoot/steady on radar to give you time to slow down. With the V1 it is LITERALLY worth it's weight in gold from the times it's "helped" me out.
I never even looked at one due to it being in the back of a magazine, so i thought it was a typically penis enhancer (false claim) product. I did buy a Rocky Mountain radar detector/laser jammer (kill me now). Had some MP buddies on base that let me give it a try, they all laughed and said they had me the moment i rolled out of first. Sent it back in time to recoup all my money, lessen learned.
Rode with a good friend one day that had one and he took me around town to prove how well it truly worked (arrows show when/where cop was and had passed). Also with the strength bars, when it falses, it never really pegs the Strength bars unless 5 feet away from false source. When a cop is running constant on (K, KA, never any X here) it will build and build till you know for sure something is up. The distance on it is insane, literally the 1 mile-2 mile as advertised (for me in the city it's usually the lesser distance due to obstructions). I talked about wanting one so much my girlfriend bought me one (She's the best!!). I'd rather have my car keyed than lose my V 1. .
I had mine installed (hardwired) for Key On power (turns of when key is off) and had the wire ran through the head liner so my Det. is mounted up high next to my rear view with a 2inch limo tint strip in front (to hide from thieves and tint in the rear to hide from people behind me/cops. Also had the secondary box that came with it installed under the dash in case later on i want to run the hidden arrow pointer thing in a vent/hidden spot surreptiously. (cost install $35 at a local stereo shop). Buy the V1, worth every damn penny. (Sorry long post!!)
 
O

onrailz

New Member
May 18, 2004
52
0
0
Jul 7, 2004
#76
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #76
V1 is the best...
 
C

chuckystang

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
217
0
0
Jul 20, 2004
#77
  • Jul 20, 2004
  • #77
Im glad I read this thread because Im not going out to waste more money on a better radar/laser detector. I just wish the law was fair when pulling cars over. 50mph in a 30 zone while driving a cobra is the same as 50mph in a 30 zone in a honda accord...but who always gets pulled over...well you all know the answer! Its funny when you think about it because realistically the cobra is still safer at that speed because it can stop and handle much better if needed (just accelerate up to the speed limit as hard as you want and then STOP!) HAHAHA...I wander if their is a law for accelerating to quickly?
 

Mustang_02

Member
Jan 26, 2004
113
0
17
Jul 20, 2004
#78
  • Jul 20, 2004
  • #78
There is, it's called Reckless Endangerment.
 

AmdMAN

Founding Member
Jul 21, 2001
849
0
0
Kentucky
May 20, 2006
#79
  • May 20, 2006
  • #79
Mustang_02 said:
There is, it's called Reckless Endangerment.
Click to expand...

Actually it's Exhibition of Speed.
 

1999SVTVert

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
70
0
0
Gainesville, FL
May 20, 2006
#80
  • May 20, 2006
  • #80
Depends on your state/locale, and either way, it has been almost two years since anyone was worried about it-

Back from the Grave!!!

:SNSign:
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Car has been overheating. Not sure what is causing it. Any help would be appreciated.
  • Luckysgirl
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
97
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
Luckysgirl
L
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
266
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
M
Inheriting (and likely restoration of) a 1965 Mustang
  • miniwheats235
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
240
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2026
Realmongo
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
703
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?