• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

I noticed something about using different fuels, do you notice the same?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox1x
  • Start date Start date Feb 1, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Feb 1, 2006
#1
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #1
I have a 2000 MGT, since I bought it (about 4 months ago) I have used just 87 octane. The car runs suberb. I get about 19 MPG mixed driving, and on my trips back home I'm getting around 23 MPG. However, I decieded for shats and giggles to put some 89 in the car. It *seemed* (maybe just a placebo) to have slightly better throttle response. The car, to me, felt like it was running better on 89. So, for the next 3 fill-ups I put in 89. My mileage dropped to 17 MPG mixed and 20 on my trips home. I was trying to drive as consistant as possible.
I decieded to try 93 octane. Didn't notice a difference drom the 89, milage remained about the same as with the 89. Only did that for 2 fill-ups, then went back to 87. I just filled up this morning with 89 again and the car feels smoother. Do the MGT's prefer 89? Anybody else noticing this with their car? Or, am I full of it? I swear though, this car feels more responsive with the 89.

(I know with my previous cars 93 was all I used, it even states in the manual and on the fuel door "premium fuel only." However, those were high compression motors; I thought the 4.6 was designed to run on 87.)
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,186
17,888
224
Massachusetts
Feb 1, 2006
#2
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #2
it is designed to run on 87 octane. Only the 4.6L DOHC in the Mach's and Cobras (and certain Lincolns) require premium.


Engineeringwise, the engine should make more power on 87 octane. The motor is not really a high compresson motor so running higher octane shouldn't really do a thing for you.

Some guys expeirence detonation on 87 octane, myself included. Cars has done that since 9000 miles. SO every now and then i put it a little bit of 89 octane to keep that under control.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Feb 1, 2006
#3
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #3
Don't mean to steal the post, but my stang seems to run worse with "cheap" gas. I thought all gas came from the same company/place....
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,186
17,888
224
Massachusetts
Feb 1, 2006
#4
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #4
Maybe it's time for a tune up??


They say gas is all the same, but i don't beleive that. Each company adds different additives and lubricants and such.
 
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Feb 1, 2006
#5
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #5
Not all gas comes from the same company. There is *some* validity about gas coming from the same place... there are only so many places it is currently being harvested from. There is crude oil from South America, Middle East, Gulf of Mexico, etc.

Anyhow, maybe it is just my imagination, that's why I posted here. I swear though, it feels a little more peppy with that 89.
 

USMstang

Member
Oct 30, 2004
114
2
19
Mississippi Gulf Coast
Feb 1, 2006
#6
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #6
I never noticed much difference in any brand I used while out on the road (first 40,000 miles). When I reprogrammed with the Predator, I noticed a huge difference in brands of 93. The difference was in detonation not peppyness.
 

jayssilver4.6

New Member
Mar 7, 2004
54
0
0
Burleson, TX
Feb 1, 2006
#7
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #7
The only time I ever run the good stuff(ie 93 octane ) is when I bump my timing up with the timing adjuster. Other wise I can't feel any differance in the 3 grades. Every so often I'll run 2 tanks of the good stuff and a can or two of Chemtool to clean it up a bit. I've not ever noticed any detonation on the cheap stuff. As for the brand of gas thing, I live in Texas and we have refineries there on the gulf and there is a company called Coastal Petrolium Deliveries ( or something like that ) that delivers a lot of gas. I see that truck at every gas station in town except for the valero and Wal-mart, so what does that say...
 

The Stang GT

New Member
Nov 29, 2005
81
0
0
Feb 1, 2006
#8
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #8
The 4.6L is a Sports Car, You should only run 91-93 octane in your car.
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Feb 1, 2006
#9
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #9
A stock Mustang GT is designed to run 87 octane. Higher octane fuel is harder to ignite and will actually lose power. If you bump your timing with a timing adjuster or tune, you will need to run higher octane to prevent detonation.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Feb 1, 2006
#10
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #10
Mustang5L5 said:
Maybe it's time for a tune up??


They say gas is all the same, but i don't beleive that. Each company adds different additives and lubricants and such.
Click to expand...


yup thats true each company throws in a blend of additives but most are used by all except for a few.....example like the winter blend for certain states that their fueal is oxyginated
 

ocbaud

Member
May 7, 2005
239
1
18
Midwest City, Oklahoma
Feb 1, 2006
#11
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #11
i usually run 89 in mine because with 87 i get detonation under wot
 

jcint

Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
2
16
wellington florida
Feb 2, 2006
#12
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #12
I tryed 87 and my 96 gt stock and it runs crappy you hear knocks on the engine when i floor it. 89 runs ok depending where i got the gas but 93 ALWAYS runs good on my stock GT.
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Feb 2, 2006
#13
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #13
jimfitzgerald said:
Higher octane fuel is harder to ignite and will actually lose power.
Click to expand...


That might sound good, but it makes no sense. Once the spark fires, it all burns. Octane rating only means it takes a higher pressure to ignite without a spark. It doesn't mean they added dirt and water to make it burn poorly :/ Higher octane gas might indeed have less energy per liter than say, 87, but the difference is so minimal you could make it up by cleaning out your glove compartment. A bigger issue concerning energy density would be oxygenated fuels used in the winter in most cities. Oxygenated fuel has less energy than non-oxygenated fuels, per liter, and you will get noticeably worse mileage.

AFAIK, the flash point of a fuel is unrelated to the amount of energy it stores. And octane has nothing to do with the speed at which the flame front propogates.

All gasonline isn't the same once you include additives, so one brand's 87 might knock, while another brand's doesn't. Every station in an area might get their gas from the same refinery, but use different additives to get the octane numbers they sell.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Feb 2, 2006
#14
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #14
The Stang GT said:
The 4.6L is a Sports Car, You should only run 91-93 octane in your car.
Click to expand...

Wow.. wrong, wrong and wrong.

First off, the 4.6L is an engine, not a sports car.. but assuming that was just a typo, let's move on. That particular engine is found not only in Mustangs, but other cars as well. Do you consider the lincoln town-car a sports car? I sure don't, but it has the 4.6.

Secondly, you should run what the manufacturer recommends (which is not 91 or 93 octane in the GT's) unless you have reason to run otherwise, which has been addressed in this thread numerous times already.

I apologize to the original poster for getting off topic.
 
M

Master_Chief

New Member
Sep 4, 2005
30
0
0
Oregon
Feb 2, 2006
#15
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #15
I experimented a little, just put like 5 buck worth of gas at a time, my car HATES regular, so I usually use 89, abd every once in a while, I will fill it with 91/93, it does seem to react better, plus, when you think about it, you really aren't dumping an extra c-note by upgrading to better fuel, I think it is worth it.
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Feb 2, 2006
#16
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #16
i figure the cost of a new engine from knocking and detonation is far more than what I spend on the extra $2 or $3 buying premium, so I run it. I'm certainly not suggesting it makes sense, or everyone should. However, i did have an 80's 2.2 turbo that detonated itself to death on 92 octane a number of years ago, so I might just be overly concerned about it

Basically, according to every technical article I could find, just because your car says 87 octane in the manual doesn't mean it won't knock with some 87 octane gas in some conditions. So it would make financial sense to run the lowest octane that never detonates in your car.

I noticed on long trips between Chicago and norther MN that the car seemed to run smoother on 91 than on 87, but mileage was not noticeably different. So I run 91 all the time in my 03. The fact that it doesn't "need" it is just a nice thing to know.
 

dustang50

Member
Jan 12, 2006
132
0
16
Cleveland, OH
Feb 2, 2006
#17
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #17
BP gas is crap. I've been told by my Ford dealership to steer clear of the big green...

After tuning my car I've had to use 91+ octane. It "seems" that my car runs better on Shell & Sunoco, but I think it's all in my head...
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Feb 2, 2006
#18
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #18
Your "study" was hardly scientific and your "results" are anecdotal at best.

Anyway, for the stock tune best to use 87.

In any case, use the lowest octane your can use without getting detonation.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Feb 2, 2006
#19
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #19
I haven't noticed any real measurable difference in grades of gas. Now where the gas was purchased I have noticed a difference. If you for example purchased the 87 and the 89 and 93 at different places then that may explain the differences you saw.
Also oxygneated fuels SUCK I get stuck using it most of the time. I get worse mileage and when I'm planning on spraying I have to go outta town and get good fuel.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,186
17,888
224
Massachusetts
Feb 2, 2006
#20
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #20
The Stang GT said:
The 4.6L is a Sports Car, You should only run 91-93 octane in your car.
Click to expand...


Why?







I disagree 100% but why make such a bold statement and not back it up with any supporting facts.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
839
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
216
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
704
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
Fox What gas do you run in your foxbody?
  • Mindseye007
  • May 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 19, 2024
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?