• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

I Stroking really worth it?.. get your Mind out of the gutter...

  • Thread starter Thread starter balderman
  • Start date Start date Jul 14, 2004

balderman

New Member
Dec 6, 2002
563
0
0
Spring City, PA
Jul 14, 2004
#1
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #1
I was thinking of Getting the motor stroked to a 347.. But is it really worth it? How much HP is really gained from it, or is it more Torque...
 

Nucking Futs

Founding Member
Jan 5, 2002
158
0
16
Franklin TN
Jul 14, 2004
#2
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #2
YES!

With out question yes. Horsepower is a good increase but torque is the name of the game. My 347 makes 310 hp, it is a really mild build but even with that it makes 370 ft torque through an automatic. I have seen 347 make 350/360 hp and 420/430 ft tq with no problem.

If I had to do it all over again I would go 393 myself and that is what I am going to do next. I'll be a member of the 500/500 club.

Don't let anyone tell you about rod ratio, oiling pin, yadda, yadda, yadda about the 347. The rod ratio is better in a 347 than a 454 Chevy. I have had mine for three plus years and not a single problem. It is like anything else use quality parts and you will get quality service out of the engine.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Jul 14, 2004
#3
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #3
Are you upgrading your heads and cam? Do you have a B cam in that crate motor? If you are doing a 347 I would definitley go with more cam and bigger heads than GT-40X heads.

Jake
 

donjohn

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
1,757
0
0
Irvine - Southern California
Jul 14, 2004
#4
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #4
are you guys talking about a build off the stock block? because i thought that was out of the question for a 347 stroker, i heard 331 was the biggest people would trust it- or do i not know what i'm talking about
 

mstangfrk95GTS!

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
203
0
0
Jul 14, 2004
#5
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #5
it all depends on the parts used and the machine work/builder........

one of the mags did an articel a few years back with a 302 v 347 with all stock top end cam, heads, intake etc.......

the 347 made like 35hp more with the stock stuff.
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
Poughkeepsie, NY
Jul 14, 2004
#6
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #6
GTJake said:
Are you upgrading your heads and cam? Do you have a B cam in that crate motor? If you are doing a 347 I would definitley go with more cam and bigger heads than GT-40X heads.

Jake
Click to expand...
....if your gonna do it , you gotta do it right and then of course you must say to yourself, is boost in the future, because a boosted 347 will have no problem destroying that production block...the beauty of the game i guess....


Anthony
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Jul 14, 2004
#7
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #7
yes you will get alot more power out of it but it won't be as reliable. If you going any bigger you will have to get better heads and cam. And if you want a blower forget it. How about you take the 351 you have in that truck and built the **** out of that.

Dustin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Headers please help.
  • gray owl
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
6
Views
318
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Feb 27, 2026
ctandc
C
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
400
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
Engine (EGR Deleted) Solution the hotter combustion chambers?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
97
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2026
PonyGTrider
B
Screamin Demons Worth It N/A?
  • Blackout67
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
273
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
Noobz347
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?