• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Identifying Transmission

  • Thread starter Thread starter dbdragracing
  • Start date Start date Sep 10, 2007

dbdragracing

Member
Dec 1, 2004
397
2
18
Sep 10, 2007
#1
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #1
I just bought a 1970 Ford Mustang Mach 1 351C. The door tag is gone due to a repaint. How can I tell which automatic transmission I have? Thanks.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Sep 10, 2007
#2
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #2
You can look at it! seriously though, you can take a pic or describe it here and most people who have autos will let you know. Or there probably is a tag/stamped code on the tranny.
 

dbdragracing

Member
Dec 1, 2004
397
2
18
Sep 10, 2007
#3
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #3
Thanks I will look and maybe post some pics....I go pick the car up today!!!!
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Sep 10, 2007
#4
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #4
If this helps.........

Here's a webpage that ID's tranny pan gaskets/filters..... compare the "shape" of the gasket and number of bolt holes to those attributes on your on your pan.

http://www.bulkpart.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=2&Category_Code=Ford

Unless some major mods have been made; your choices should be limited to C4, C6 and FMX. Probably an FMX; although factory "big-powered" Cleveland 4V's sometimes came with a C6.
 

dbdragracing

Member
Dec 1, 2004
397
2
18
Sep 10, 2007
#5
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #5
Thanks...the vin# says the car is a 351C 4v and the owner said it was the original motor with some work done to it! Later.
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Sep 10, 2007
#6
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #6
A factory 4V Cleveland from 1970? I'd lean a little more towards the C6.

FMX can be "built" for the HP/torque of an early 4V Cleve; but Ford already had the C6 by then........
 

dbdragracing

Member
Dec 1, 2004
397
2
18
Sep 10, 2007
#7
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #7
I used my Cars & Parts Magazine Catalog of Mustang ID Numbers 1964.5-93 book to read the vin# and it says the fifth digit in the vin indicated the motor. Mine is "M" and the book says thats a 351 CID V-8 (4V). I will know a 100% after the Marti report. Thanks.
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Sep 10, 2007
#8
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #8
Well, all that's left is to (as Bullit said) crawl underneath and look!
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Sep 10, 2007
#9
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #9
no factory c6 in 70 for the cleveland, either 2v or 4v, at least in the mustang. only trans it could have been would be the FMX. don't doubt the FMX though, it's a very stout trans, the big penalty with the FMX is weight because of the cast iron main case but the benefits are that it's tougher than a C4 and has about the same parasitic power loss as the c4, it's a little more but not much, it's also almost as tough as a C6 but has much less parasitic power loss than the C6 does, almost half. the only other big problem with the FMX is the difficulty in finding peformance parts for it, shift kits and convertors aren't too hard to find but still not as easy as the others.

however there is one place where you can most everything you need for a performance built FMX, should you decide to go that route;

www.broaderperformance.com

you can get stall convertors, Alto Red Line clutches and pretty much anything you'd ever need for an FMX. also check out the Ford trasnmission forum on network54.com

http://www.network54.com/Forum/260730/

you can learn anything and everything you ever wanted to know about the FMX or any other ford auto trans there.
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Sep 10, 2007
#10
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #10
Bryan, I don't doubt the FMX at all! I've beaten the crap out of a couple of them; although apparently not enough to waste 2nd gear. Other than gasket leaks and one cracked pan (big rock in the wash that was our "driveway" after a storm); I have never had one let me down.

I'm thinking that, no matter what I do the the XR-7's Cleveland; the only reason the FMX alone would get yanked would be if I were to throw massive $$$ at a built AOD.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Sep 10, 2007
#11
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #11
StangDreamin' said:
Bryan, I don't doubt the FMX at all! I've beaten the crap out of a couple of them; although apparently not enough to waste 2nd gear. Other than gasket leaks and one cracked pan (big rock in the wash that was our "driveway" after a storm); I have never had one let me down.

I'm thinking that, no matter what I do the the XR-7's Cleveland; the only reason the FMX alone would get yanked would be if I were to throw massive $$$ at a built AOD.
Click to expand...



i have wasted 2nd gear but that was due to the extra harsh shifts from the shift kit i had installed. it was a factory Ford shift kit and it was a stout SOB. we fixed that problem the last time i had it rebuilt by installing a steel "flex band" in place of the stock cast iron 2nd gear band. that is probably the only real weak point of the stock FMX. i've heard, though, that you can now use the 2nd gear band from an AOD and not have any problems. wish i could remember where i gleaned that little bit of knowledge so i could verify it's accuracy.

did you know that the AOD is actually based on the FMX? it's a fact, the inner workings of the AOD are absed on the FMX and many of the internal parts are interchangeable.

i actually have an AOD core that needs to be built but i decided against using it in the stang, though it will probably find it's way into the 69 coug
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 10, 2007
#12
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #12
Easiest way to Id these is just looking at what you've got. C-4 is all aluminum with a removeable bell. C-6 is all aluminum, but is all in one piece, no removeable bell. FMX has aluminum bell but iron case, bell bolts are external, like a manual trans, C-4's bell bolts are internal
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Sep 10, 2007
#13
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #13
D.Hearne said:
Easiest way to Id these is just looking at what you've got. C-4 is all aluminum with a removeable bell. C-6 is all aluminum, but is all in one piece, no removeable bell. FMX has aluminum bell but iron case, bell bolts are external, like a manual trans, C-4's bell bolts are internal
Click to expand...


FMX also has an aluminum tail housing as well the aluminum bell housing, only the main case is cast iron.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 10, 2007
#14
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #14
Right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T5 identification
  • 3054tony
  • May 16, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
248
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
AeroCoupe
Proper Transmission fluid for a 84nwc t5
  • Sask84gt
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
341
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2026
Sask84gt
R
Flex plate and starter issues
  • RJH46
  • Jun 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
19
Views
996
Other Auto Tech Aug 19, 2025
nickyb
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
164
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
47
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?