• Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information

If all goes well

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangerman
  • Start date Start date May 26, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

stangerman

New Member
May 6, 2004
13
0
0
May 26, 2004
#1
  • May 26, 2004
  • #1
I will have my bike sold this week and pick up a stang. Just in time for the Three Hills cruise to boot. I am looking at an 87 GT, it's rough. The hood flew open and smashed the windshield and destroyed the hood. The kid who owned it ruined the interior, it's real dirty and some panels are missing. The rods that hold the hatch open are shot and it needs paint. It's canary yellow has power locks/windows, air, tilt. The engine is recently rebuilt and strong, but the kid spray bombed the the upper intake black looks like crap. There is so much dirt in the engine bay you can't see where the firewall ends and the valve covers begin. But there is no rust or dents on the body, and the asking price is $3000.00, but I am going to offer him 2000.00 the way it is. What are your opinions?

Edited cause I can't spell.
 

itsgreat2bme

New Member
Sep 12, 2003
288
0
0
Regina
May 26, 2004
#2
  • May 26, 2004
  • #2
I don't know all that much about buying and selling, but to me 3000 seems a little steep, if I were to sell my car I'd be asking 3000 and there's nothing wrong with my car, the interior is great, very very small amount of rust, fully loaded,
Is the fact that it's a GT and mine is an Lx make the difference between my car which is great all around and that car which seems to have only the 'GT' going for it?
 
J

johnny lats

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2001
318
0
0
Kelowna, BC
May 27, 2004
#3
  • May 27, 2004
  • #3
itsgreat2bme said:
I don't know all that much about buying and selling, but to me 3000 seems a little steep, if I were to sell my car I'd be asking 3000 and there's nothing wrong with my car, the interior is great, very very small amount of rust, fully loaded,
Is the fact that it's a GT and mine is an Lx make the difference between my car which is great all around and that car which seems to have only the 'GT' going for it?
Click to expand...

I am going to go out on a limb here, and say that the fact the GT has the 5.0 engine, better tranny and 8.8 rearend, while yours has the 2.3L engine and associated running gear, makes up for the difference in price.
 
S

stangerman

New Member
May 6, 2004
13
0
0
May 27, 2004
#4
  • May 27, 2004
  • #4
Speaking of tranny, the synchro's are gone out of third. When you downshift from fourth you have to move the stick to second and then to third. And it's making a noise while under load (the tranny), if you coast with the clutch engaged it doesn't make the scraping sound, as soon as you apply gas it starts to make the noise. I am beginning to think it's just not woth anything but a parts car.
 
J

johnny lats

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2001
318
0
0
Kelowna, BC
May 27, 2004
#5
  • May 27, 2004
  • #5
I wouldn't pay 3000 for it. For a bit more you can get a perfectly functioning GT that doesnt need work done to it.
 

itsgreat2bme

New Member
Sep 12, 2003
288
0
0
Regina
May 27, 2004
#6
  • May 27, 2004
  • #6
johnny lats said:
I am going to go out on a limb here, and say that the fact the GT has the 5.0 engine, better tranny and 8.8 rearend, while yours has the 2.3L engine and associated running gear, makes up for the difference in price.
Click to expand...
meh, You're the expert, not me. Just seems like it's a little too beat up to be paying 3000 for it
 

StangGrrLy

Miss StangNet 2003
Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
1,330
0
0
Regina, Saskachewan
May 27, 2004
#7
  • May 27, 2004
  • #7
It is true that people think they can ask an arm and a leg for their Mustang just because it's a GT, but you gotta look a little further than that. From all the things you've mentioned, I think it might be too far gone, especially for 3G's. I'd point all these things out from a knowledgeable perspective (make the kid understand that you know your Mustangs), and then shoot him an offer of like $2000. Sounds like the thing needs a fair bit of interior work, plus a new tranny. but it's just a lot of little things. So in the end, it up to you how much work you wanna put into it.
 

mitchwolos

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
1,801
0
0
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada EH
May 27, 2004
#8
  • May 27, 2004
  • #8
i paid 3800 for my mustang in perfect working order, with rust spots on the hatch and leaning seats and a stain on the carpet

3000 is too much for a pile
 
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
May 28, 2004
#9
  • May 28, 2004
  • #9
mitchwolos said:
i paid 3800 for my mustang in perfect working order, with rust spots on the hatch and leaning seats and a stain on the carpet

3000 is too much for a pile
Click to expand...

 
R

Red2000GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
2,450
0
46
Regina,Sask.Canada
May 28, 2004
#10
  • May 28, 2004
  • #10
WOT said:
Click to expand...
2000 sounds plenty fair. I'd say hold off and look around for a while to find a decent one and pay 3000 for it.
 
D

dude5l

Founding Member
Dec 24, 2001
201
0
0
Grande Prairie, Alberta , Canada
May 29, 2004
#11
  • May 29, 2004
  • #11
I would question as to whether the engine was actually rebuilt or not. He might be the type that added a can of "Restore" and called it good. Usually when someone has an engine out they wash the engine bay. Just my opinion, I would be very wary.
 
S

stangerman

New Member
May 6, 2004
13
0
0
May 29, 2004
#12
  • May 29, 2004
  • #12
I won't buy it unless he drops to like $1500. IMHO it's bunk.I have found a decent 86 GT for 2500. I'll prolly pick that up. Thanks for the advice.
BTW any1 going to the three hills cruise?
 
M

mwdguy

I gave my car a rim job!
Founding Member
May 27, 2002
504
0
0
Edmonton, AB Canada
May 29, 2004
#13
  • May 29, 2004
  • #13
johnny lats said:
I am going to go out on a limb here, and say that the fact the GT has the 5.0 engine, better tranny and 8.8 rearend, while yours has the 2.3L engine and associated running gear, makes up for the difference in price.
Click to expand...


Ummm LX's were available with the 5.0 etc as well.
 

Nibz

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
322
0
0
Regina, Sk. Canada
May 30, 2004
#14
  • May 30, 2004
  • #14
mwdguy said:
Ummm LX's were available with the 5.0 etc as well.
Click to expand...

we all know that..his signature says 89 lx 2.3.....

he was refering to the gt that this guy is looking to buy and the lx 2.3 that the other guy owns..
 
S

stangerman

New Member
May 6, 2004
13
0
0
May 30, 2004
#15
  • May 30, 2004
  • #15
The "he" with the lx is a "she" and I know he LX models came with the 5.0l, I used to own an 87 LX 5.0L auto. I have also owned an 82 GT with T-tops, and a 76 Mustang II with a 5.0L. I bought those cars without really looking at them first and got owned on each one, the LX lasted almost a year with only going through two tranny's before the rear seal went. The body was rusted badly so I got rid of it. The 82 GT engine blew about two weeks after I got it, spun a bearing. The 76 Mustang II was condemned by the DOT in B.C about three months after I bought it. So my luck with stangs is all bad so far. But for some strange reason I still find myself attracted to the cars, I just need to get a good one from a reliable source. So as soon as I sell my dirt-bike (2002 RM-250 $4000.00) or find a car to trade on, I will be able to get another. I was hoping to make the three hills cruise, but I only have 6 days to pull it off now.
 

itsgreat2bme

New Member
Sep 12, 2003
288
0
0
Regina
May 30, 2004
#16
  • May 30, 2004
  • #16
stangerman said:
The "he" with the lx is a "she"
Click to expand...
Thank you! hahaha, I found it funny that Nibz was the one who pointed out my sig, and then pointed out (inadvertently) that he didn't read/understand the whole sig.
yes I am a girl, and yes I drive an 2.3L '89Lx and it's given me very few problems in the over 4 years I've owned it, sorry to hear you've had so much troubles, I like MY wussy little stang
 
S

stangerman

New Member
May 6, 2004
13
0
0
May 30, 2004
#17
  • May 30, 2004
  • #17
302 can't beat a 2.3L on fuel. I seem to have a thing for getting buckets.
 

StangGrrLy

Miss StangNet 2003
Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
1,330
0
0
Regina, Saskachewan
May 31, 2004
#18
  • May 31, 2004
  • #18
You wanna talk about buckets? My 93 2.3L has cost me $3500 (!!) in repairs over the last three years. You name it, it's been replaced...and that's NOT including the price I paid for the car, or any stuff I've done to it like stereo, new paint, tint, wheels that kinda stuff. Why do I still own it you ask? Well it's practically a new car now lol and it will make a good solid project car when I get around to making it fast.
 

aete2

Founding Member
Nov 23, 2001
554
3
19
May 31, 2004
#19
  • May 31, 2004
  • #19
I could have bought a 90 lx 5.0 with nothing wrong 2 days ago for 2gs 13000ks so i would say no don't buy it. Just my 2 cents
 
S

stangerman

New Member
May 6, 2004
13
0
0
May 31, 2004
#20
  • May 31, 2004
  • #20
Where? I got an offer on my bike today, so I hope this one pans out, I'll have about 3g's to spend on a car...

edited cause my fingers are dyslexic.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
R
Car shuts off under throttle, idles fine. Looking for some pointers.
  • rmarcotte
  • Jul 8, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 1, 2023
rmarcotte
R
I
Exorcising a '78 Mach I
  • IICrew
  • Aug 10, 2020
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
10K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Sep 26, 2022
Adieu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?