• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

I'm embarrassed

  • Thread starter Thread starter oh9mustang
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2009
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
O

oh9mustang

Banned
Jul 27, 2008
138
0
0
Aug 18, 2009
#1
  • Aug 18, 2009
  • #1
2010 Ford Taurus SHO Officially Unleashed with 365 Horsepower. A 3.5 L V-6
That could smoke the mustang GT. Thats not as bad as a Camaro V-6 beating the Mustang GT , but it's close. WTF. A 4 door POS V6 beating the Mustang GT?
I Think I will puke.
 

lostprophet894

New Member
Aug 13, 2009
1
0
0
Fairfax, VA
Aug 18, 2009
#2
  • Aug 18, 2009
  • #2
If the Mustang community is educated on what that car is capable of then there shouldn't be any embarrassment.

If you have the mods to make that kind of power, put it in it's place. If not, move along.

I have to say that is pretty impressive for a six cylinder though. I hope it looks better than previous models of the Taurus.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Aug 18, 2009
#3
  • Aug 18, 2009
  • #3
Forst off it's not a P.O.S. it a twing turbo v6 ecoboost. 2nd it's not going to beat a mustang gt it weighs 4,000 lbs. 3rd a V6 camaro may beat your mustang but being all the stock mustangs i;ve seen run 13.7-13.8 mine included and a v6 camaro runs 14.3 I'll say what have you been watching.
 

GreyDiesel

New Member
Jul 26, 2008
167
1
0
Denver, CO
Aug 18, 2009
#4
  • Aug 18, 2009
  • #4
Taurus SHO:
0-60 in 5.8s
1/4 mile in 14.2 @ 99.1
Slalom at 62.9mph

YouTube - SHO-time? Ford Taurus SHO vs. 2009 Infiniti G37 @ the Track

Mustang Bullitt (okay, I could not find the video for the stock GT, but you have to assume very similar numbers)

0-60 in 5.2s
1/4 mile in 13.8 @ 102.1
Slalom at 67.2

YouTube - 2008 Ford Mustang Bullitt @ the Track

Boom! Older mustang still wins. Its all about torque to weight ratio. Though granted, the SHO is nipping at our heels. Just wait to upgrade to a 2012 stang, or... get a supercharger, or.. be happy with what you got, cause its still uber cool.
 
O

oh9mustang

Banned
Jul 27, 2008
138
0
0
Aug 19, 2009
#5
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #5
Tommy?
I'm not sure what Forst is, And any car that has 4 doors is, IMO, a POS.
You can say the mustang would win, but IMO, 365 hp Beats 305 hp just about every time. The rest of your post is incoherent gibberish, maybe grammar check would help.

lostprophet
If your going to "Mod" then you must Mod both cars the same, and in doing so the mustang would lose. I presume we are talking about a Stock GT and a stock Taurus, and I would still be embarrassed. And Move along? Hua?
 
0

02GTRX

I told an admin to shut up...now I live with the S
20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 27, 2004
213
8
19
Aug 19, 2009
#6
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #6
Just because a car has more hp doesn't make it better. Fact is the sho is still slower than the mustang. Just be glad ford finally stepped up in power in the sedan market.
Posted via Mobile Device
 

Steel Horse

Member
Oct 28, 2008
0
0
16
Altoona, IA
Aug 19, 2009
#7
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #7
No need to worry about the SHO having more power. There are trucks with more power than our Mustangs and you don't seem worried about them. It all comes down to power and weight.
 

lostprophet894

New Member
Aug 13, 2009
1
0
0
Fairfax, VA
Aug 19, 2009
#8
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #8
oh9mustang said:
lostprophet
If your going to "Mod" then you must Mod both cars the same, and in doing so the mustang would lose. I presume we are talking about a Stock GT and a stock Taurus, and I would still be embarrassed. And Move along? Hua?
Click to expand...

If that's the case then I'm misunderstanding your post. You're actually talking about being embarrassed by being beat by a car that you knew could beat you in the first place.

I was under the impression you were talking about being beat and embarrassed on a street setting, which is where my "move along" comment came from. The Taurus may or may not have what it takes to beat an S197. Judging by previous comments and numbers presented it seems it doesn't. But if it can, then you stepping up and getting embarrassed by losing to it would be the same as doing so against a Z06.
 

Ken04

New Member
May 24, 2007
235
0
0
Vancouver Washington
Aug 19, 2009
#9
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #9
GreyDiesel said:
Taurus SHO:
0-60 in 5.8s
1/4 mile in 14.2 @ 99.1
Slalom at 62.9mph

YouTube - SHO-time? Ford Taurus SHO vs. 2009 Infiniti G37 @ the Track

Mustang Bullitt (okay, I could not find the video for the stock GT, but you have to assume very similar numbers)

0-60 in 5.2s
1/4 mile in 13.8 @ 102.1
Slalom at 67.2

YouTube - 2008 Ford Mustang Bullitt @ the Track

Boom! Older mustang still wins. Its all about torque to weight ratio. Though granted, the SHO is nipping at our heels. Just wait to upgrade to a 2012 stang, or... get a supercharger, or.. be happy with what you got, cause its still uber cool.
Click to expand...


the 2-month-ago Road & Driver-Track-Auto-Trend rag has the 2010 Mustang running to 60 in 4.9, the new Camaro SS @4.8 and the new Challenger R/T at 5.2 or something.

Let's see, Mustang or Taurus ? Ummmmmm, that's a tough decision. Vette or Impala, Sebring or Challenger ? A large percentage of the population will buy a 4 door, front drive, smooth riding, easy driving car. Nothing wrong with that. But that Taurus aint no Mustang. I didn't buy my car cause it's the fastest. I wanted a Mustang.
 
C

COBESGT

Member
Oct 19, 2004
231
0
16
Dubuque, Iowa
Aug 19, 2009
#10
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #10
OK, I've got something to say to this post, as I am the owner of a SHO and a Mustang GT. Granted my SHO is a 1991 and I have been known to call it a POS (only in good fun), for it's era it was a fairly fast car (it will run mid to high 14's @ 98 mph, GTECH times). I guess I really don't understand what is so embarrassing about loosing to a car that has more power than yours? Who cares that Ford has come out with an engine that has more power than the engine in your Mustang. I say Kudos to Ford for doing this! Look at what it is, it's a twin turbo engine! What kind of power would your Mustang make with a twin turbo set-up, heck what about a single turbo? Will this Ford initiative lead to bigger an better things for the Mustang, perhaps?.?. Back in the 1990's, when the SHO's and Mustang GT's would race, it would have been a very close race, and that's with a stock V6 vs. a stock V8. I think some people should just be happy that they have a very nice car, that has great power, great fuel economy, great looks, and stop worrying about what other cars have for power. I can honestly say that if I were to race a new SHO and lost to them, I wouldn't be upset, it's more about the adrenaline rush and having fun!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 19, 2009
#11
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #11
oh9mustang said:
Tommy?
I'm not sure what Forst is, And any car that has 4 doors is, IMO, a POS.
You can say the mustang would win, but IMO, 365 hp Beats 305 hp just about every time. The rest of your post is incoherent gibberish, maybe grammar check would help.
Click to expand...

Attitude unnecessary.

...and a grammar check of your own post wouldn't hurt either smart guy.
 

lostprophet894

New Member
Aug 13, 2009
1
0
0
Fairfax, VA
Aug 19, 2009
#12
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #12
COBESGT said:
OK, I've got something to say to this post, as I am the owner of a SHO and a Mustang GT. Granted my SHO is a 1991 and I have been known to call it a POS (only in good fun), for it's era it was a fairly fast car (it will run mid to high 14's @ 98 mph, GTECH times). I guess I really don't understand what is so embarrassing about loosing to a car that has more power than yours? Who cares that Ford has come out with an engine that has more power than the engine in your Mustang. I say Kudos to Ford for doing this! Look at what it is, it's a twin turbo engine! What kind of power would your Mustang make with a twin turbo set-up, heck what about a single turbo? Will this Ford initiative lead to bigger an better things for the Mustang, perhaps?.?. Back in the 1990's, when the SHO's and Mustang GT's would race, it would have been a very close race, and that's with a stock V6 vs. a stock V8. I think some people should just be happy that they have a very nice car, that has great power, great fuel economy, great looks, and stop worrying about what other cars have for power. I can honestly say that if I were to race a new SHO and lost to them, I wouldn't be upset, it's more about the adrenaline rush and having fun!
Click to expand...

Well said sir.
 
B

BLKNED

Member
Jan 27, 2008
67
1
9
Aug 19, 2009
#13
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #13
oh9mustang said:
Tommy?
I'm not sure what Forst is, And any car that has 4 doors is, IMO, a POS.
You can say the mustang would win, but IMO, 365 hp Beats 305 hp just about every time. The rest of your post is incoherent gibberish, maybe grammar check would help.
Click to expand...

Wow. So you don't think that weight, torque, transmission, and gearing have anything to do with it? What about suspension and traction? To say one car will win just because it has more horsepower is a very ignorant statement.
 

Steel Horse

Member
Oct 28, 2008
0
0
16
Altoona, IA
Aug 19, 2009
#14
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #14
COBESGT said:
OK, I've got something to say to this post, as I am the owner of a SHO and a Mustang GT. Granted my SHO is a 1991 and I have been known to call it a POS (only in good fun), for it's era it was a fairly fast car (it will run mid to high 14's @ 98 mph, GTECH times). I guess I really don't understand what is so embarrassing about loosing to a car that has more power than yours? Who cares that Ford has come out with an engine that has more power than the engine in your Mustang. I say Kudos to Ford for doing this! Look at what it is, it's a twin turbo engine! What kind of power would your Mustang make with a twin turbo set-up, heck what about a single turbo? Will this Ford initiative lead to bigger an better things for the Mustang, perhaps?.?. Back in the 1990's, when the SHO's and Mustang GT's would race, it would have been a very close race, and that's with a stock V6 vs. a stock V8. I think some people should just be happy that they have a very nice car, that has great power, great fuel economy, great looks, and stop worrying about what other cars have for power. I can honestly say that if I were to race a new SHO and lost to them, I wouldn't be upset, it's more about the adrenaline rush and having fun!
Click to expand...

+1

With the money I spent on my Mustang I could have gotten a few cars that on paper are much better. But in the end those cars are not Mustangs. How often do you see someone go up and compliment someone on their Mitsubishi? Not very often I would guess. I get compliments on my Mustang just about every time I take it somewhere.

People get so caught up in HP numbers, 1/4 mile times, 0-60 times, skidpad, and all the computer controlled systems that they forget when you are out cruising none of that stuff matters. The great thing about Mustangs compared to pretty much any car in the world is the ability to make it your own. When you buy a Mustang from Ford you are getting a blank canvas to work with. You can up the power, add to the styling, and almost anything else you can imagine. So I say forget about the numbers enjoy the car for what it is not what it isn't.
 

stangdude2000

Founding Member
Jun 23, 2001
1,727
0
0
Northern VA
Aug 19, 2009
#15
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #15
Guys next time you pull up to a Mack truck at a stoplight, you should be scared. Depending on the model, they come with anywhere from 325 to 485 horsepower!

But seriously, the SHO is actually a pretty sweet ride. IMO, it is a little bit too expensive. If I was going to spend $40k on a car, I'm pretty certain it would not be a Taurus, although they are great looking vehicles.

And if all 4-door cars are POS's, I guess my uncle is pretty dumb buying his Maserati Quattroporte. And the M5 that he sold for the Maserati. He probably should've bought a Hyundai Tiburon instead since by that logic, it isn't a POS.
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Aug 19, 2009
#16
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #16
oh9mustang said:
Tommy?
I'm not sure what Forst is, And any car that has 4 doors is, IMO, a POS.
You can say the mustang would win, but IMO, 365 hp Beats 305 hp just about every time. The rest of your post is incoherent gibberish, maybe grammar check would help.
Click to expand...



yep, anything 4 door is a POS.













this car right here keeps up with mine pretty good compared to other cars i've raced.




in your opinion 365 horsepower beats 305 everytime? spend some time down at the track. or go to local part stores and just wait for morons to come up and talk to you with their 1200 horsepower cars that can't run anything faster then a 13 flat.


ever hear of a toyota supra? i've seen a few run the numbers they claim, but many claiming close to 1000 hp, and can't get into the 12s.

remember, its not the base model taurus that'll be competing with us, its the S.H.O.

SUPER. HIGH. OUTPUT.


i've also yet to find a new camaro owner that wants to run. even an SS.

theres so many variables horsepower is my least concern. the car weighs 2 tons.
 
E

erzats

New Member
Nov 7, 2008
74
0
0
Aug 19, 2009
#17
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #17
AA, +1^
 
B

browning_1

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
27
0
0
columbus, ohio
Aug 19, 2009
#18
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #18
ok i was at the track friday and there was a v6 camaro running high to mid 15s the 2 passes i saw him run was a 15.6 and a 15.8, and thats in ohio at one of the fastest tracks around, and the guy seemed like a decent driver, in my stock mustang well besides cai and tune i ran 13.7 how is that even close to smoking a mustang? my dads 05 dodge ram hemi has a 56 more hp than me guess i better not try and race him or ill get beat
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Aug 19, 2009
#19
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #19
browning_1 said:
ok i was at the track friday and there was a v6 camaro running high to mid 15s the 2 passes i saw him run was a 15.6 and a 15.8, and thats in ohio at one of the fastest tracks around, and the guy seemed like a decent driver, in my stock mustang well besides cai and tune i ran 13.7 how is that even close to smoking a mustang? my dads 05 dodge ram hemi has a 56 more hp than me guess i better not try and race him or ill get beat
Click to expand...


exactly. GM can make a 6 banger that has the hp number people like to see, but it wont perform good as the number makes it out to be.


horsepower sells cars, torque wins races.
 
O

oh9mustang

Banned
Jul 27, 2008
138
0
0
Aug 19, 2009
#20
  • Aug 19, 2009
  • #20
Gearbanger
Smart guy.
There wasn't any unnecessary Attitude. If you would read his post maybe you would agree that grammar check would be in order, ( here it is)
"Forst off it's not a P.O.S. it a twing turbo v6 ecoboost. 2nd it's not going to beat a mustang gt it weighs 4,000 lbs. 3rd a V6 camaro may beat your mustang but being all the stock mustangs i;ve seen run 13.7-13.8 mine included and a v6 camaro runs 14.3 I'll say what have you been watching."
And just were in my post is it grammaricly incorrect ? Or maybe you are having a unnecessary Attitude.


COBESGT
Has a 1991 car that runs 14.5 I'm guessing it doesn't have 365 hp.


autumn_again
Yes. A bunch of 4 door POS with wings, Ha Ha Ha , Probably watch Fast and furious 5 times.


The cars, Mustang and Taurus, are close to the same weight and size. Just because someone says the Taurus will run 14s don't really mean it will run
14s.
People talking about Trucks and Tractors are just -----. You fill in the blank. And then go race a aircraft carrier, it has a lot of hp.

BLK
"To say one car will win just because it has more horsepower is a very ignorant statement. " So don't say it. I said a 365 hp Taurus would beat a 305 hp mustang and it's not front wheel drive, it's all wheel drive.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
802
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
662
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
B
Price?
  • Blueinfan
  • May 27, 2022
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
5K
What is it Worth?!?!? May 30, 2022
7991LXnSHO
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?