Ken04
New Member
sorry for 3 posts in a row, but forgot this one, the rear end on the s197 has pissed off alot of people. from switching from a good working 4 link to a decent 3 link. and solid axle with a IRS option vs just solid axle.
several people swap the irs cobra rear into everything from foxbodys to new edge gts. some people like the IRS.
they both have their good areas. ford should of kept it 4 link and gave an option for irs.
my biggest thing is the damn wheel hop these cars have. replaced upper and lower control arms, and still every once ina blue moon it'll hop. especially in the rain. its not quite as violent as stock, where you feel you might get hit in the face with your dashboard as it gets ripped off from the earthquake like shutters you get.
if i had heavier wheels on the car i'm sure that'll help solve the problem, but it wasn't a problem for my bone stock 94 gt. yet i buy a brand new "muscle" car and i have to throw $400+ at the rear end to fix a problem that a car on with a chassis based in 1979 didn't have.
read the Road and Track from a couple months ago. Mustang vs Camaro vs Challenger. Mustang-solid rear axle. Camaro and Challenger-IRS. Every tester liked the Mustang the best. Because a solid rear is the best set-up ? No, because Ford has been building the Mustang for almost 50 years, they got it figured out.
No system is best for every scenario. I know the 3 link has it's drawbacks, but overall, for straight line, cornering, ride and maintenance, it's pretty close to being perfect.