• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

injectors, calibrated meter and NO GO!

  • Thread starter Thread starter leon_reynolds
  • Start date Start date Sep 15, 2005
L

leon_reynolds

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
91
0
6
Sep 15, 2005
#1
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #1
Just finished up upgrading to 42# injectors, along with a pro-m 80mm maf. The meter was calibrated for my supercharger and I was excited to get back on the road. The car barely starts, acts like it is flooded......sounds like it is missing, stalls immediately, only starts only under full throttle. I was hoping I could just plug everything together and off I go. Anyone experience this after swapping injectors? Is this also something that could happen from being lean? Not sure what to do next, any help is appreciated.
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Sep 15, 2005
#2
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #2
pull codes .. thats all we can do with our efi systems...on another note do you have a fpr if so you say it flooded then turn the fuel pressure down see how that works out. also change your plugs i had simlar problem after i fixed it i was chasing a demon of fouled plugs.. good luck

also alot of people are gunna say your crazy for getting 42s for a paxton only putting out 7 #s of boost
 

Blown86

New Member
Sep 12, 2005
1
0
0
Kansas
Sep 15, 2005
#3
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • #3
I had almost the same problem with my car. 30lb injectors, calibrated c&l 76, d1sc 14lbs. It would start but very rich, tried tweeking the fuel pressure but didnt help. Took it to get dyno tuned and it starts and idles fine now, gets way better mpg now too. Tuner told me i need bigger injectors and would fine tune the driveability when they are installed.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Sep 16, 2005
#4
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #4
This seems to be a farly common mistake lately. Tossing in 42 lb injectors and a calibrated meter is just part of what needs to be done. The EEC fuel ramps and injector breakpoints are not designed for the amount of fuel a 42 lb injector is capable of providing. Even the minimum pulsewidth for the injector is way off (imagine for instance, the minimum (idle)for a 19 lb injector being 10% and carrying that same 10% over to a 42 lb injector (EEC commanded) on the same engine combo.... that's considerably more gas). You're in need of a custom tune whether it's a burned chip from a good dyno shop or something like the TwEECer or Anderson PMS. Since you've already got a meter calibrated for the injectors you're using, I'd suggest the Anderson. It's much simpler to learn and use than the TwEECer although more expensive. If you don't have a lot of plans for further modifying then your best bet may be a customed burned chip.

Good Luck.
 
L

leon_reynolds

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
91
0
6
Sep 16, 2005
#5
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #5
Thanks for the info.......I was looking into getting a tweecer so i could calibrate myself when upgrades arrive. I didnt know anything about the anderson pms although they seem considerably more expensive. Does the tweecer do the same functions, or does the anderson have a better product? I do not care much about the ease of use, I would rather spend a little more time researching and learning then spending the additional money if accomplishes the same thing.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Sep 16, 2005
#6
  • Sep 16, 2005
  • #6
leon_reynolds said:
Thanks for the info.......I was looking into getting a tweecer so i could calibrate myself when upgrades arrive. I didnt know anything about the anderson pms although they seem considerably more expensive. Does the tweecer do the same functions, or does the anderson have a better product? I do not care much about the ease of use, I would rather spend a little more time researching and learning then spending the additional money if accomplishes the same thing.
Click to expand...

They are "different" products. It will totally depend on what your preferences are for their use as to which one you get.

Instances for what little I know about your combination:

42 lb injectors
MAF calibrated for 42s
Supercharger

The PMS is easy to use. You can add or subtract fuel at an portion of the RPM range as a percentage to bring your AFR up (or in your case down) to the appropriate level. The PMS will make use of BAR/MAP which makes it simple to add fuel based on a boost reference. There is not a huge learning curve required to make the PMS perform these functions

The TwEECer on the other hand, will give allot more control over engine tuning. It allows you to make modifactions to the MAF transfer curve (something that you do not necessarily require if your meter calibration is accurate). It allows modification of a HUGE number of scalers within the EEC. It can not make use of a BAR/MAP for boost referencing but instead require tune of the fuel ramps, spark tables, injector breakpoints, dapshot settings, and a host of other things to perfect the tune for the combo regardless of what that combo happens to be. The learning curve is very steep. It will require a considerable amount of time to learn and many hours spent on the forums to help figure out what does what and why.

My reason for thinking that the PMS would be better suited to your application comes down to your not needing to modify the MAF transfer curve. With a Tweecer you can use pretty much any meter. You would load the transfer function into the Tweecer then tell it what size your injectors are (there's a bit more to it than that but that's it in a nutshell). In your case, I think that it all be done a ton easier with and Anderson PMS.

Read through each of their forums and decide which one you think would work best for you. Then throw your hands up and say "screw it" and go out and get a custom chip and tune.

P.S. A custom tune and chip will cost your roughly $600 and another $100 for each for each subsequent tune after modifactions are made.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Pro-M 75MM Bullet Flow Sheet - Is this calibrated for 36 # injectors?
  • dan50
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
313
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jan 11, 2026
dan50
1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
560
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
898
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
0
'04 V6 running rich excessively on both banks
  • 04DSGVert
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
349
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Oct 27, 2025
04DSGVert
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?