• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

injectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter habiv
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2007
H

habiv

Member
Oct 28, 2004
125
1
16
Jun 15, 2007
#1
  • Jun 15, 2007
  • #1
I have a 90 GT with very minor mods (exhaust, bigger TB + mass air, k+n filter). I am about to have an edlebrock performer intake manifold (upper and lower) put on the car and I wanted to also have the injectors replaced while the manifold is off because I just went over 100k. Should I go to 24 pound injectors or are new 19's sufficient? I do not have any crazy power plans for the car in the future, Possible new heads at some point but no forced induction. What should I get, 24 or 19 pund injectors? Also, if I get 24's is there any other mod I need to do, such as a different mass air, in order to accomodate the 24's. Thanks for the help.
 

85ragtop

BTW, I like dudes.
10 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
823
475
123
NC
Jun 15, 2007
#2
  • Jun 15, 2007
  • #2
n\m
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 15, 2007
#3
  • Jun 15, 2007
  • #3
19lbs should be enough, but some people will suggest 24's. I guess thats why they say every car is different.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jun 15, 2007
#4
  • Jun 15, 2007
  • #4
jector HP ratings: divide flow rating by.5 and multiply the result by the number of injectors. This uses a 100% duty cycle. These ratings are for naturally aspirated engines.

Example:
19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP
36/.5 = 72, 72 x 8 = 576 HP
42/.5 = 84, 84 x 8 = 672 HP

The preferred duty cycle is about 85% maximum, so for a safety factor multiply the final figure times .85.

304 HP x .85 = 258 HP
385 HP x .85 = 326 HP
480 HP x .85 = 408 HP
576 HP x .85 = 490 HP
672 HP x .85 = 571 HP

Remember that the above ratings are at 39 PSI. Increasing the pressure will effectively increase the flow rating. Example: a 19 lb injector will flow 24 lbs at 63 PSI, and a 24 lb injector will flow 30 lbs at 63 PSI.

See http://users.erols.com/srweiss/ to get the calculators used in these examples.


If you use larger injectors, you will neeed either a Tweecer, custom dyno tune or an aftermarket MAF calibrated to match the injector size.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Jun 15, 2007
#5
  • Jun 15, 2007
  • #5
An intake, alone, shouldn't be enough to warrant upgrading to 24's. If you had a full H/C/I setup, then yeah, 24's would be a must, but with stock E7's and the stock H.O. cam ... nah. You're safe.

HOWEVER ... since you'll have the fuel rail off, that would be a VERY good time to upgrade to a different KIND of 19# injector. Go nab some newer-design 4-hole injectors from a 4.6L T-Bird or Cougar (orange-ish yellow in color ... some other new Fords use them, as well), put on some new O-rings, and plug them puppies in there. I switched to 'em when my three of my stock injectors cracked and started drooling fuel out the sides, and they haven't given me a problem since. Supposedly, they provide a smoother idle and better combustion because they've got a finer spray pattern - I dunno if there's any reality to that or not, but they are a better quality design, overall.

Even if you don't swap out the injectors for new/different ones, DEFINITELY replace the O-rings and pintle caps while you've got 'em out. You do NOT wanna have to deal with that leaky headache later on, trust me.
 
H

habiv

Member
Oct 28, 2004
125
1
16
Jun 16, 2007
#6
  • Jun 16, 2007
  • #6
Thanks for all the info!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
699
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
643
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
I
Engine Insane fuel trims +25% LTFT Bank 1, -16% LTFT Bank 2
  • imw_stl
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
252
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 19, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?