• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

installed a typhoon today looks cool

  • Thread starter Thread starter Foxfan88
  • Start date Start date Apr 14, 2007

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Apr 14, 2007
#1
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #1






View attachment 389898
some little cars on my tv lol

my car felt down on power or seemed to make low numbers, i am running thumper heads, b-cam advanced 4degrees and i had a tmoss lower and my own port matched upper.

i tried out the typhoon and it seemed to make a difference. nothing huge, but u can feel it on the SOTP meter. BUT it did seem to lose a tad low end, the tmoss intake had more torque down low i could definatly tell that after i ran with the typhoon.
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Apr 14, 2007
#2
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #2
that does look cool. nice work
 
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
Apr 14, 2007
#3
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #3
Looks good! I mylself got one a few weeks ago, one of my buddys talks crap about that "chinese intake" I really don't care what he thinks as long as it does the job and saves me a couple of hundred bucks I'm happy.
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Apr 14, 2007
#4
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #4
all you guys with a typhoon, hows the fit and finish on it. I heard some horror stories about how it lacks the proper vacuum connections and the fitment is poor
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Apr 15, 2007
#5
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #5
it has the holes for fittings for vacuum. i simply used one of the Ts (pipe fitting with 2 big nipples. i used it for the BB line and the PCV, i get some extra tubing for the PCV line and i had to trim the BB line for a better fit, for the others i bought 2 1/8in. pipe fitting with a vaccum nipple on the end, for the FPR and some other vaccum line. i ditched the canister line up front.

there WERE fitment problems.

the fuel rails were harder to get on, the lower is taller and the injectors have to change angle a bit to fit right. no biggie.

biggest flaw. the distributor would rub on the intake. on the lower corner where the bottom bolt holes the module on. that corner rubbed the intake near the water neck. and on the back. the small lip where the cap sits, it rubbed the lower a tad bit, i trimmed it some. its CLOSE i cant even get the stock black rubber dizzy boot i like to run. these were the only problems i ran into. other wise the holes and stuff was dead on. the upper i have was untouched and i didnt seeing a problem with the ports at all. the opening was 70mm and was round as could be.

all through the inside was uniform and nice ( has the removable plenum cover. its the polished version and i think they use a tumbling machine and it gets all up in there because ever nook and cranny of the upper is polished even the inside. only thing i did was grind down a small hump just inside the TB hole.

the 8 ports on bottom matched the edelbrock gasket i bought perfectly. my lower was port matched and cleaned up a bit matched to a 1250 felpro,

i got it for 200 shipped and i think its a good deal, made a difference i can tell. got to get to the dyno and the track
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Apr 15, 2007
#6
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #6
i put the same upper and lower on my car. but i also changed to 24lb injectors and a 76mm c&l mass air. ive also got a 65mm tb. i noticed a huge difference in power. also the power band is a lot higher. i didnt really lose any low end either. i had the same clearance problem with the dizzy. i also had to grind some metal down to get the bolt on at the front driver side mounting hole where the upper and lower bolt together. other than that smooth sailing.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Apr 15, 2007
#7
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #7
i used studs on those driver side end bolts u speak of. on the front one i had to use a wrench. couldnt get a socket on it.

i went into it expecting problems and what i posted was all i ran into which isnt bad at all.
 
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
Apr 15, 2007
#8
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #8
I truly noticed nice gains in the mid to upper rmp range. Didnt have any fitment issues though.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Apr 15, 2007
#9
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #9
looks good!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
799
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
692
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
331
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?