• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

intake doesn't line up on my 351w??

  • Thread starter Thread starter speadfreak
  • Start date Start date Apr 9, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

speadfreak

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
118
0
0
Apr 12, 2006
#21
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #21
jaredgoodwin said:
That doesn't look like a single plane intake to me. How do the ports line up?
Click to expand...

no, it's definately a single plane. It has that plate in the middle, so the right two barrels of the carb feed the right bank of the engine and vice versa. All the intake runners are on the same level and each runner uses the straitest route from the carb to the intake port on the head. A dual plane feed half the cylinders with very short runners and the other half with long runners, which is why a dual plane produces power at a lower RPM range. It just doesn't look like a single plane because there is no air gap between the intake runners and the valley cover. It is similar to an edelbrock torquer II (which is a single plane). If I'm wrong about this, somebody please correct me. LOL...."how do the ports line up?"........uh, they don't.......thats the point of this thread. Not trying to be a dik, but it seems like you responded in this thread from taking a quick look a the picture and not reading anything.
 
J

jaredgoodwin

New Member
Sep 29, 2004
62
0
0
Apr 18, 2006
#22
  • Apr 18, 2006
  • #22
Single planes don't have a divider.
 
1

1quik69

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
38
0
0
Apr 18, 2006
#23
  • Apr 18, 2006
  • #23
manifold

A for sure way to find out what the manifold fits would be to take all of the numbers & info off of the manifold and call offenhauser or try punching the info in on Summits website. I have solved several problems with id's on parts using Summits website. Look on the bottom of the manifold and along all the runners underneath for different #'s etc. as well as on top of the manifold.
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Apr 18, 2006
#24
  • Apr 18, 2006
  • #24
If it has a center divider, it's NOT a single plane. This IS a dual plane intake. Just thought you'd like to know so you don't look stupid next time
 

speadfreak

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
118
0
0
Apr 26, 2006
#25
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #25
PoopDawg said:
If it has a center divider, it's NOT a single plane. This IS a dual plane intake. Just thought you'd like to know so you don't look stupid next time
Click to expand...

"stupid"? maybe do a little homework before saying that I look stupid. Yes...dual plane intakes have a center divider. Yes....so does mine. But,.....on a dual plane intake, one side feeds two cylinders on the right bank and two on the left. Also.....on a dual plane, one of the divided sections in the carb opening is up higher than the other one allowing the runners to "overlap" each other. On MY intake, even though there is a divider, all the runners that stem from the right side of the carb opening feed the right four cylinders and visa versa. All of the runners on MY intake are on the same level.....same "plane". They do not make these intakes anymore and the only thing close is made by weiand and is for the FE engines. Here check out this link, if you still think I sound stupid, then call and argue with summit or weiand. http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?part=WND-7282&N=4294822065+115&autoview=sku
 

speadfreak

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
118
0
0
Apr 26, 2006
#26
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #26
Hey look, that one looks like the same exact design as mine, besides it is obviously wider for the FE engine. I hate it when people get all "I'm smarter than you" when they dont know what they are talking about. I will give it to you that it does look like a dual plane at first sight. So, if I didn't REALLY understand the differences in how a dual or single plane intake actually work, I might have thought the same thing. If I welded a divider plate down the middle of a Vic Jr. or Parker funnel web, it would not make it a dual plane.....it would make it a split plenum single plane. Besides, I never asked for help in deciding what type of intake it was........it was an alignment issue. I'm not even gonna use this intake now, I found out it must be for a 351 with a 9.2 deck height.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
880
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?