• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

intake/head combos

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1994Vib.RedGT
  • Start date Start date Sep 27, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 28, 2004
#21
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #21
GTJake said:
Dude...there are plenty of people running high 8's in the 1/8 with stock heads and cam. You don't need ported stockers to do that.

Jake
Click to expand...
On stock radials with nearly an 85mph trap speed.......show me.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Sep 28, 2004
#22
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #22
Gearbanger 101 said:
On stock radials with an 84.6mph trap speed.....show me.
Click to expand...

I caught your ninja edit!

You never said anything about trap speed, but I'm sure snoozer is right up there. I ran high 8s (8.9) in the 1/8 with stock heads, cam, TB and MAF.......on radials.

Jake
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 28, 2004
#23
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #23
Sneaky edit, huh.

Most stockers I've seen have run anywhere from 9.4's to as high as 10.0. at around 78-80mph.

I also forgot to mention I ran them in a loaded, full weight LX with 75lbs worth of junk, stereo and just 3.55 gears out back.

I wasn't trying to get into a pissing match with anyone about my car, just sticking up for the guys running stock castings. Yeah AFR, Edelbrocks, and TF's are better all around, but they're still more money. And for the do it yourselfers like myself, I personally find it more satisfying to beat the guys with the mail order rides.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 28, 2004
#24
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #24
When it comes to heads don't waste time on the 99 cent specials. A set of Canfield heads don't run much more than any of the prementioned heads (except for the thumpers). There are plenty of other places to save money.

Kurt
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 28, 2004
#25
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #25
Call summit and tell them www.poweredbyford.com has TW heads for $999 they will match the price and you get free shipping
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 28, 2004
#26
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #26
I think a set of Edelbrock heads will get the most out of that Cobra intake.

Kurt
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Sep 28, 2004
#27
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #27
Summit should be the cheapest place to get TF since they own them.

Dustin
 

HoofnIt

Founding Member
Jan 8, 2001
1,175
0
36
North Carolina
Sep 28, 2004
#28
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #28
If you're going through all of the time, effort, & money to do a headswap, spend a little extra money on some good alum. heads. If not, when you do get the heads you reall want you'll have to do the swap all over again. Get what you want the first time and do it once. Just my .02
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 28, 2004
#29
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #29
revhead347 said:
When it comes to heads don't waste time on the 99 cent specials. A set of Canfield heads don't run much more than any of the prementioned heads (except for the thumpers). There are plenty of other places to save money.

Kurt
Click to expand...
Let me get this strait, you consider Edelbrocks, AFR's and TFS heads 99 cent specials? But Thumper heads are fine? And I'm guessing that ported E7TE heads are junk, right.....Well what do you think thumper heads are?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 28, 2004
#30
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #30
I don't care for AFR heads. I think they are a complete rip off. Little performance gains for a lot of money. Twisted Wedges have come with the cheapest hardware available since Summit bought them. It's not a bad casting, but it could do with better hardware. Edelbrock heads are good quality, but for the price you could get a set of Canfields, so what's the point? I think ported E7TE heads are a great deal. Especially if you spend $20 on a book and port them yourself. You could have a decent set of heads for less than $100.

Kurt
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Sep 28, 2004
#31
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #31
revhead347 said:
I don't care for AFR heads. I think they are a complete rip off. Little performance gains for a lot of money.
Click to expand...
You know what, I agree entirely! AFR's are junk, definitely stay away from them.

Dave
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Sep 28, 2004
#32
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #32
Kurt what do you run for heads? What shot are you running?

To the original poster. My advice is to pick a goal that you want for your car performance wise. Whether it be dyno numbers, track times, or street fun and then get the head that will best suite that.

Jake
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 28, 2004
#33
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #33
I chose Canfields, because I saw a large advantage in performance for not a whole lot more money. I'm running a 47 nitrous jet, with a 46 bypass jet. But I thought over it a little more, and I'm not sure a Cobra intake will take advantage of the better cylinder heads. So my best suggestion would be to try and find a used set of Edelbrocks.

Kurt
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 28, 2004
#34
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #34
revhead347 said:
I don't care for AFR heads. I think they are a complete rip off. Little performance gains for a lot of money. Twisted Wedges have come with the cheapest hardware available since Summit bought them. It's not a bad casting, but it could do with better hardware. Edelbrock heads are good quality, but for the price you could get a set of Canfields, so what's the point? I think ported E7TE heads are a great deal. Especially if you spend $20 on a book and port them yourself. You could have a decent set of heads for less than $100.

Kurt
Click to expand...
I can agree with that frame of reasoning. I guess some just have better luck with a company than others. There are dozens on this board who live and die by AFR's, but between yourself and Hairy Canary, it looks like I just found a couple of guys who wouldn't use them as a boat anchor.
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Sep 29, 2004
#35
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #35
I think HairyCanary was making a joke. Since he does run a AFR/FTI setup.

Dustin
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Sep 29, 2004
#36
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #36
revhead347 said:
I don't care for AFR heads. I think they are a complete rip off. Little performance gains for a lot of money.
Click to expand...
Little perfomance, huh? They're just the best heads on the market....

I'll say it once and I'll say it again: AFR are THE BEST heads on the market, period - end of discussion. Not only are they the best, but they use the stock valve angles - something TFS and (I believe) Canfield don't do. They don't raise their ports for more efficiency like Canfield does, and they don't need special headers; something TFS does. Does Canfield? I'm not sure...

Quantify your reasoning. I'll bet you can't. I'll bet few can.

Joe
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Sep 29, 2004
#37
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #37
Joes95GT said:
Quantify your reasoning. I'll bet you can't. I'll bet few can.
Click to expand...
Joe, Joe, Joe .... You must have forgotten rule #1 of Internet Racing 101 -- thou shalt ignore the facts, and substitute with bluster.

I would agree with the argument that AFR heads are not the best "bang for buck" option, as you pay extra to get that last little bit of performance. But, if even by a slim margin, they are provably the best, when the definition of "best" is making the most power under the curve. That offends some people -- those who fail to understand that the definition of "best" differs from person to person. Such a simple concept.

Dave
 

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
Sep 29, 2004
#38
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #38
Well, I want to get into mid to low 12's. I know I have a long way to go, but I want to run those times on a 94/95 cobra intake, and E-303 cam. But if the E-brock heads are new is finding a used set a possiblity
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,649
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 29, 2004
#39
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #39
Joes95GT said:
Little perfomance, huh? They're just the best heads on the market....

I'll say it once and I'll say it again: AFR are THE BEST heads on the market, period - end of discussion. Not only are they the best, but they use the stock valve angles - something TFS and (I believe) Canfield don't do. They don't raise their ports for more efficiency like Canfield does, and they don't need special headers; something TFS does. Does Canfield? I'm not sure...

Quantify your reasoning. I'll bet you can't. I'll bet few can.

Joe
Click to expand...

I think you mean Qualify your reason. But anyone. I know 2 guys that bought AFR 165s. One guy put them in a Lighting, and the truck ran 1/10th slower. The other put them on a stang, and it picked a whopping 2/10ths. They are decent heads, but not for the money. TFS and Canfield heads change valve angles and exhaust ports to get more performance. That's what makes it a high performance head. A 17 degree head is limited. 21 degree heads just perform better. Canfield advertises a high port design, but both TFS heads, and Canfields work with factory height headers. If you want to see what head is the best look at the competitors in NMRA. Almost every single top ten runner was using either old TFS hiports or Canfields, until they took them off the approved cylinder head list. AFR 220 heads make huge hp numbers, but they want more money for that than a Canfield, and it is no where near a Canfield in performance.

Kurt
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 29, 2004
#40
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #40
I don't think you can call any head "The best" I think it's all in the cam (to a certain extent). You can buy a good set of heads and put a crappie cam and the heads become useless (boat anchors). My View attachment 522204
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Broken lower intake bolts
  • Mike3
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
850
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
D
For Sale 1993 Mustang LX for parts or restore
  • diesel farmer
  • Oct 6, 2026
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
397
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 6, 2026
diesel farmer
D
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Surging/stalling! problem or tune?
  • djj62478
  • Oct 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
361
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 14, 2026
KRUISR
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
620
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?