• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Intake manifolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter MidnightThunder
  • Start date Start date Sep 9, 2004
M

MidnightThunder

New Member
Feb 22, 2004
39
0
0
North Ridgeville,Ohio
Sep 9, 2004
#1
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #1
I have a 1986 302 5.0L engine that I am working on so I can swap it into my LX.I will want to (if not now,in the future) swap out the upper and lower intake manifolds for ones that flow more air.

Would the manifolds for an 87-93 5.0 fit on an 86 or not?It's easier to find parts (and they are cheaper) for those than the engines from 79-86.
 
9

90FRANKENSTANG

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
6
0
0
Sep 9, 2004
#2
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #2
THE LOWERS ARE ALL THE SAME. IT'S THE "86" UPPER THAT SUCKS. FIND AN UPPER INTAKE FROM "87" ON UP AND LEAVE THE LOWER ALONE.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Sep 9, 2004
#3
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #3
And change the heads.
 
O

onefastlx

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
42
0
0
Sep 9, 2004
#4
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #4
I would go for a cobra or TFS street intake,if money is a concern find em used!!
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 10, 2004
#5
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #5
90FRANKENSTANG said:
THE LOWERS ARE ALL THE SAME. IT'S THE "86" UPPER THAT SUCKS. FIND AN UPPER INTAKE FROM "87" ON UP AND LEAVE THE LOWER ALONE.
Click to expand...

The lowers are the same, but actually, the lower intakes are much more restrictive than the upper. See the link in my signature for power gains from porting stock lower intakes.
 

artus70

New Member
Jul 31, 2004
72
0
0
Sep 10, 2004
#6
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #6
On the same subject sorta, Didn't want to start another thread although I'm still a bit lost being new to the fuel injected world . I want to change my intake Cause it's ugly, was thinking of just sending it for powder coat or change it completely....every intake seems to gain HP but at a loss of low end. Since I'm in NY low end is everything to me.Coming off the light Tires blazing up till the next light about 100 ft away .....any suggestions....how is the Cobra set up?
Also I'm keeping the engine stock except for Cold air,Mac headers,H pipe and cat back. I figure no sense dumping money into an engine thats fine...if and when I blow it I'll order a crate already done out of the Box??
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 10, 2004
#7
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #7
Take a look at the torque curves in my garage, torque is up all the way through the curves - you won't loose a thing, only gain. The unported Cobra/Explorer is also a good intake but you will loose some lower end with some upper end gains - my garage also has two dyno results with graphs of Rio5.0 who took off one of my ported lowers and put a Cobra on with no other changes. Also note that dyno comparison STARTS at 3,000 rpm, a properly ported intake has a bigger advantage the further down the rpm scale you go.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 10, 2004
#8
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #8
PM tmoss in the post above you. Getting one of his lowers will allow you to retain as much low end as possible without breaking your budget. What have you got for rear gears in your car....a set of 3.73's would help.
 

artus70

New Member
Jul 31, 2004
72
0
0
Sep 10, 2004
#9
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #9
Yeah got the 3:73s. The car runs amazing now but I'm cleaning up the engine compartment and the plenum has to go. I liked the Comp Polymer intake cause its small (for looks and work space) but would gain upper at loss of lower...Edelbrock does the same ect ect alot of them give gains in the 2500rpm and up ranges but seem to all effect lower end....Trick flow has one rated for idle to 5500 which sounds perfect for me...anyone use it??? And still havent found any stats on the Cobra intakes????
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 10, 2004
#10
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #10
Either a Cobra Intake or the regular Edelbrock Performer would be your next best bet. With a powerband starting at 2500rpm, my guess is that you were looking at the Performer RPM. The comp although light and compact will really kill your low end torque. You should be able to pick up any of them used. I personally think the Cobra is the nicest looking out of the bunch. Especially after it's been polished.
 

artus70

New Member
Jul 31, 2004
72
0
0
Sep 10, 2004
#11
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #11
Yeah I agree the cobra is nicer in looks...have been leaning that way just needed the info....I do like the trick flow look also...heard or know anything about them?? Again thanks for the help thus far.
 
O

onefastlx

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
42
0
0
Sep 12, 2004
#12
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #12
The trick flow will outflow the cobra in stock trim,I have a cobra with the upper/lower extrude honed and this thing rocks.But If I was buying another intake again and wanted peak power below 6000 RPM I would go with the TFS steet heat and Extrude hone it.
 

PhLoBuS

New Member
Aug 15, 2004
473
0
0
Beverly, MA
Sep 12, 2004
#13
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #13
edelbrock =]
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 12, 2004
#14
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #14
onefastlx said:
But If I was buying another intake again and wanted peak power below 6000 RPM I would go with the TFS steet heat and Extrude hone it.
Click to expand...

It flows 240-250cfm out of the box, no need to EH it unless your heads flow more than that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
300
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Engine Running like crap :(
  • justadude07
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
359
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2025
DadLife0724
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
542
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
594
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Re-torquing intake manifold bolts question
  • 91GTstroked
  • Feb 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 1, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?