• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

intake opinions wanted

  • Thread starter Thread starter murphs 94 stang
  • Start date Start date Jun 11, 2008
M

murphs 94 stang

New Member
Jun 2, 2008
9
0
0
central missouri area
Jun 11, 2008
#1
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #1
i currently own a 94 cobra and am wondering which direction if any i could go on my intake , maf ,and injectors with my current set before i purchase a new twEECer or go to the A9L setup i have the stock cobra intake and 24lb. injectors with a stock throttle body and a C&L cold air kit...........let the suggestions flow please
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Jun 11, 2008
#2
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #2
Personally I would just port the lower and do a custom cam. I think I would also use a lightning maf and a tweecer to tune it. You should be good for 300rwhp with that. I am betting you are around 280 now. This is just me though. These are things I am planning to do myself later on.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 11, 2008
#3
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #3
I'd honestly go with a RPM 2 intake, 70-75mm TB, and a custom cam. I've got a Performer intake with your heads and feel it is too small. You will have to work with the RPM 2 to match up to the runners of the 165 heads but I think it will make nice power. I made 328rwhp and 337rwtq.
 
R

RoushTbird

New Member
Jun 6, 2008
59
0
0
DFW
Jun 11, 2008
#4
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #4
unless you plan to supercharge that beast, keep the TB at 70mm. These motors dont like too much air. I found this the hard way.
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Jun 11, 2008
#5
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #5
The performer rpm 2 is a good intake but it will sacrifice some torque and gain hp in the upper rpm's but it's all up to the original poster and what he wants to do with the car.

A ported cobra intake will work similarly to the performer intake but give up a small amount of high rpm power. I don't know that the power gain with the performer would be worth the cost of the intake though since the original poster already has the cobra.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,673
90
79
Cyprus
Jun 11, 2008
#6
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #6
murphs 94 stang said:
i currently own a 94 cobra and am wondering which direction if any i could go on my intake , maf ,and injectors with my current set before i purchase a new twEECer or go to the A9L setup i have the stock cobra intake and 24lb. injectors with a stock throttle body and a C&L cold air kit...........let the suggestions flow please
Click to expand...

Looks like you already have a pretty good combo as it is but you could improve it as follows:

Send your Cobra intake to Tmoss for him to port it.
Add a 70 or 75mm TB.
Swap in a better cam. I'd suggest the CompCams XE270HR-12 (since you already have 1.7 RR's) with upgraded valve springs for the extra valve lift.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 11, 2008
#7
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #7
RoushTbird said:
unless you plan to supercharge that beast, keep the TB at 70mm. These motors dont like too much air. I found this the hard way.
Click to expand...

That makes absolutely no sense.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 11, 2008
#8
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #8
rj95svt said:
The performer rpm 2 is a good intake but it will sacrifice some torque and gain hp in the upper rpm's but it's all up to the original poster and what he wants to do with the car.

A ported cobra intake will work similarly to the performer intake but give up a small amount of high rpm power. I don't know that the power gain with the performer would be worth the cost of the intake though since the original poster already has the cobra.
Click to expand...

I don't know about you but I don't race any of my cars in the lower RPMS. Also on a serious note it has been shown time and time again that the RPM 2 doesn't take any power away from the lower rpms. I regret going small on my 5.0 and feel it would have been quite a bit faster with bigger heads/bigger intake/and alittle more aggressive cam. Maybe you guys like to baby foot around it but I like going fast!
 
M

murphs 94 stang

New Member
Jun 2, 2008
9
0
0
central missouri area
Jun 11, 2008
#9
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #9
what about the spyder with a power elbow and a 70-75 tb?....i'm planning to race this car from time to time and show it a bunch also , i like the wat the spyder cleans up the engine compartment . opinions please
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 11, 2008
#10
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #10
Its no secret that longer runner intakes have more torque down low but give up
a bit up top

The mid length runner intakes offer a nice compromise as I see it and due to that fact, I run one myself

As always, its all about application

If you drag race then its all about WOT.

If you build for the street, then you want a nice flat torque curve :Word:

You can use LT's to make up for a bit of low end loss a shorter runner intake will
most likely cause.

also

A custom cam can be used to help with low end loss.

and

A custom tune where the spark table has been worked over can help as well.

Grady
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 11, 2008
#11
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #11
murphs 94 stang said:
what about the spyder with a power elbow and a 70-75 tb?....i'm planning to race this car from time to time and show it a bunch also , i like the wat the spyder cleans up the engine compartment . opinions please
Click to expand...

If it was a 351 I'd say yes...but a 302 with a spyder type intake would suck on the street IMO.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Jun 12, 2008
#12
  • Jun 12, 2008
  • #12
RoushTbird said:
unless you plan to supercharge that beast, keep the TB at 70mm. These motors dont like too much air. I found this the hard way.
Click to expand...



If you can find one, I think the original RPM I intake would be perfect for you. An RPM2 may work, but they have significantly larger port cross sections so you'll have to take that into account. Not sure how the letter cam will react to this.

Adam
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
N
Looking for ECU/CHIP for 1992 5.0
  • Nathan26
  • Sep 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
309
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 8, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
keel
T
  • Locked
Digital Tuning A9l issue or something else
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
356
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
T
Fuel Looking for a little guidance
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
471
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 12, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?