• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Intake Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Danman765432
  • Start date Start date Apr 1, 2006
D

Danman765432

Member
Mar 3, 2006
471
0
16
Nutley, NJ
Apr 1, 2006
#1
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #1
Should I get a Typhoon, GT-40, or Eddy intake manifold, with my setup?

Also next week im getting my trans rebuilt and upgraded with a 3000rpm stall Torque Converter. It will also have hardened parts in it with a shift kit too.

Then 4:10 gears might be coming in after that, since that is what I heard is best for an AODE.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Apr 1, 2006
#2
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #2
Are you going to upgrade the heads & cam later on?


Well, the Eddy out performs the GT40. I dunno about the Typhoon. Isn't it just another version of an Eddy?

Here's a chart you can look at that may or may not help you, lol.



INTAKE COMPARISON
 
D

Danman765432

Member
Mar 3, 2006
471
0
16
Nutley, NJ
Apr 1, 2006
#3
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #3
yeah I am going to most likely do a cam and heads down the line, just as soon as I get the money. My main question though is the Typhoon a legit intake manifold and do people have problems with it, since I don't really hear about it that often and it is pretty cheap?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 1, 2006
#4
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #4
It's cheap all right - they have significant issues with inconsistant runner cross sections in the runners. They need some work to be as good as a GT40/Cobra/Explorer or a Performer. The Performer holds a slight edge (~10cfm)in flow over the GT40 style intakes but it does not add up to significant HP when used on the same engine.

Oh, that itnake comparison is taken from a 1996 Super Ford test on the Explorer - it is not correct for that intake as later testing has proven it wrong.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 1, 2006
#5
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #5
I got a RPM which is what the Typhoon was copied from.

Several peeps run that intake on this forum.

You can see more details in my sig with links.

Basically, that intake just shifts the band up a few rpm over the regular upper

Grady
 
D

Danman765432

Member
Mar 3, 2006
471
0
16
Nutley, NJ
Apr 1, 2006
#6
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #6
One other question, I am going to the junkyard to look for a GT-40 intake and possibly heads to, does the Gt-40 intake come off of any v8 explorer or is it specific years?
 
D

Danman765432

Member
Mar 3, 2006
471
0
16
Nutley, NJ
Apr 1, 2006
#7
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #7
bump
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 2, 2006
#8
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #8
any Explorer........
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Apr 2, 2006
#9
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #9
I like the trick flow intakes. I'm hopefully going to be putting mine on next week. I think the TFS intake is the best combination of looks, price, and performace out there.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Apr 2, 2006
#10
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #10
Hey Tmoss, are there any big difference between the explorer intake and the tubular gt-40?
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2006
#11
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #11
unless you are going with more cubes or a power adder later, i would recommend the performer and then the gt40 as a second choice. the typhoon is known to have many casting imperfections. it is basically a cheap knock off of the performer rpm. the intake does work, but as with most other things, you get what you pay for.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 2, 2006
#12
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #12
No significant differences in any of the 3 GT40 Style intakes - they have all been shown to flow about the smae and make within a couple of HP of each other across the rpm band.........The Expolorer can be found on ebay going for $150-200 on a regular basis. I bought mine for $200 with the 65mm tB, the Bosch design III injectors.
 
9

95vert354

New Member
Mar 19, 2006
107
0
0
Apr 2, 2006
#13
  • Apr 2, 2006
  • #13
tmoss said:
No significant differences in any of the 3 GT40 Style intakes - they have all been shown to flow about the smae and make within a couple of HP of each other across the rpm band.........The Expolorer can be found on ebay going for $150-200 on a regular basis. I bought mine for $200 with the 65mm tB, the Bosch design III injectors.
Click to expand...


What kind of flow rates can you get out of a gt-40 ported lower?
 
D

Danman765432

Member
Mar 3, 2006
471
0
16
Nutley, NJ
Apr 3, 2006
#14
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #14
tmoss said:
Oh, that itnake comparison is taken from a 1996 Super Ford test on the Explorer - it is not correct for that intake as later testing has proven it wrong.
Click to expand...

When you said this does it mean that the flow is actually higher then what that chart says or lower than what that chart says?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 3, 2006
#15
  • Apr 3, 2006
  • #15
Higher than what the chart says - it flows the same as the GT40/Cobra.

What the lower flows by itself is not a good indicator of total flow because it is short and when ported, the flow increase is dramatic. A caveat there is if you are going to use the lower on a KB blower or with a Box style upper - then the flow of just the lower is important. You can get them to flow 280-300+cfm after porting and some welding for the upper end flow range. When used with a GT40 style upper, the lower stops being the restriction and the whole intake flow is optimized for cross section and length - the length then becomes the limiting factor for that equalized/improved cross section.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
157
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
210
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Engine Re-torquing intake manifold bolts question
  • 91GTstroked
  • Feb 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
918
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 1, 2025
Jarhead67
J
HP woes with Sniper Sytem
  • Stang_1973
  • Mar 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
802
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 13, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?