• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Intake Recommendation

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94gtconvert
  • Start date Start date Feb 5, 2009

94gtconvert

New Member
Jul 16, 2003
17
0
1
Little Falls, NJ
Feb 5, 2009
#1
  • Feb 5, 2009
  • #1
What intake would you recommend to go with the following:

Edelbrock 60379 Heads
Edelbrock.com - Cylinder Heads - Ford - Small Block - Performer

AND

Crane 444225 Cam
CraneCams

Also, would the Crane 1.7 roller rockers that came standard with the GT40 cobra heads work with this combo?

This is my daily driver so there is no plans for supercharges, nitros, etc.

Thanks for looking.

Demetrios
 
R

red dragon 95

New Member
Jun 7, 2008
15
0
0
Feb 6, 2009
#2
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #2
sounds like a good canidate for an explorer or cobra intake.the heads are real nice street heads,the cam is a great tq maker and i think the above intakes will help your pocket and your combo.should make 290-310 at the wheels.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Feb 6, 2009
#3
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #3
those rockers will be fine. thats what i'm still using on mine.

i'd also agree that a cobra intake would be good but if it was me, i'd go with the edelbrock performer
 
R

red dragon 95

New Member
Jun 7, 2008
15
0
0
Feb 6, 2009
#4
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #4
id of said performer if the cam was a tad rowdier.its surprising how well the performer flows.cobra or and gt40 base intake is the best bet and cheapest.all your parts are geared for a more tq street car and thats what that cam,heads and intake are gonna deliver.youll be happy with the results.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Feb 6, 2009
#5
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #5
94gtconvert said:
What intake would you recommend to go with the following:

Edelbrock 60379 Heads
Edelbrock.com - Cylinder Heads - Ford - Small Block - Performer

AND

Crane 444225 Cam
CraneCams

Also, would the Crane 1.7 roller rockers that came standard with the GT40 cobra heads work with this combo?

This is my daily driver so there is no plans for supercharges, nitros, etc.

Thanks for looking.

Demetrios
Click to expand...

Yia sou Demetrios from another Greek Stanger.

The Eddy 60379's are good heads and would work well as a street combination with the Crane 2031 cam that you've chosen. I suggest you go for the Eddy Performer (not RPM) intake as it is matched to the heads, and the longer runners compared to the RPM will promote good low rev torque. The Crane 2031 cam is designed to work with 1.7 ratio roller rockers and the Crane roller rockers will work fine as long as you order pedestal-mount heads.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 6, 2009
#6
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #6
Application ... Application ... Application

Its always about that :Word:

You did say dd
therefore
I'd have to guess you are not all that interested in .........

Pulling to 6K or so with no drop off

If so ... Yes ... ANY of the longest runnered (is that a word)
uppers would be just dandy

Also ... I don't think that cam was setup with that in mind

Those heads however ... Well ... I'm not sure but ... Maybe
a cam with some stoutness to it and a mid length runner upper

But again ... its all about what ... YOU ... want :Word:

If Confucius didn't say it ... Well ... He shoulda

All Stang Weedhoppers who modah their daily drivers .......

Mustah be careful or cam lope and the like

Make for one frustrating daily driver

Grady
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Feb 6, 2009
#7
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #7
Edelbrock RPMII

The car will be faster than the same combination with the Cobra. Go with the Eddy Performer at least. I'm not sure why people still mess with the Cobra or Explorer intake unless they find them cheap.
 

94gtconvert

New Member
Jul 16, 2003
17
0
1
Little Falls, NJ
Feb 9, 2009
#8
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #8
Thanks for the info guys. I think I'm going to try and find a good used Edelbrock Performer to match up with the heads.

One more questions. Would a ported Edelbrock Performer be too much for a street car driven daily? Found one locally but think it would be better suited for someone who doesn't drive their car every day. What do you think?

Thanks again!!
 

94gtconvert

New Member
Jul 16, 2003
17
0
1
Little Falls, NJ
Feb 9, 2009
#9
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #9
Bullitt95 said:
Yia sou Demetrios from another Greek Stanger.

The Eddy 60379's are good heads and would work well as a street combination with the Crane 2031 cam that you've chosen. I suggest you go for the Eddy Performer (not RPM) intake as it is matched to the heads, and the longer runners compared to the RPM will promote good low rev torque. The Crane 2031 cam is designed to work with 1.7 ratio roller rockers and the Crane roller rockers will work fine as long as you order pedestal-mount heads.
Click to expand...

Yai sou!! You have a PM.

Demetrios
 
T

tstang21

Member
Apr 14, 2008
219
0
16
Feb 9, 2009
#10
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #10
a ported eddy performer would work great on the street. i dont see why not. i like the cobra/gt40 since they are at low cost. example, 1 of my friends has a ported upper/lower gt40 w/ AFRs and made over 306rwhp and a **** load of torque like 358 lbs
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Feb 9, 2009
#11
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #11
94gtconvert said:
Thanks for the info guys. I think I'm going to try and find a good used Edelbrock Performer to match up with the heads.

One more questions. Would a ported Edelbrock Performer be too much for a street car driven daily? Found one locally but think it would be better suited for someone who doesn't drive their car every day. What do you think?

Thanks again!!
Click to expand...

Are you serious? Why do you think a ported Performer intake would be too much on the street and a out of box Performer would be good?
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Feb 9, 2009
#12
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #12
tstang21 said:
a ported eddy performer would work great on the street. i dont see why not. i like the cobra/gt40 since they are at low cost. example, 1 of my friends has a ported upper/lower gt40 w/ AFRs and made over 306rwhp and a **** load of torque like 358 lbs
Click to expand...

And he probably had to shift at 4,500rpms. Plus cam has more to do with that than intake does. I had a set of AFR 165s and a Performer (not ported) and I made 328rwhp.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Feb 10, 2009
#13
  • Feb 10, 2009
  • #13
94gtconvert said:
One more questions. Would a ported Edelbrock Performer be too much for a street car driven daily? Found one locally but think it would be better suited for someone who doesn't drive their car every day. What do you think?
Click to expand...

If that intake has been ported properly (mainly the no.1 and 5 runners) so that the variation in airflow between runners has been reduced (out of the box it's only 5-6% anyway), it'll be even better than an unported Performer.
An unported Performer is just about even with a Cobra intake in torque production up to 4000rpm but thereafter, the Performer wins easily. The difference could be as much as 10hp at 5500+rpm.
 

parrish5o

New Member
Dec 22, 2008
2
0
0
Dirty South
Feb 10, 2009
#14
  • Feb 10, 2009
  • #14
Alot of people don't like them but for the price the Cobra is still hard to beat, if you could find one the GT40s they are good too. I'm running mid to low 11s with one and they are the best looking to me.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Feb 10, 2009
#15
  • Feb 10, 2009
  • #15
parrish5o said:
Alot of people don't like them but for the price the Cobra is still hard to beat, if you could find one the GT40s they are good too. I'm running mid to low 11s with one and they are the best looking to me.
Click to expand...

mid to low 11s....with nitrous..........and a 347 stroker?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
675
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
369
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
356
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
D
No start
  • dkrupp79
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
176
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
dkrupp79
D
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?