• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iowabowhunter
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
I

iowabowhunter

Member
Mar 24, 2004
62
0
7
Sep 17, 2004
#1
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #1
I have a 95 vert.
What is the bottle neck in these cars? Is it the upper plenum or the lower intake? The reason I ask is cause I'm shooting for 300 N/A flywheel hp which I've been told is obtainable even without a cam swap. I was thinking about going with a Cobra or aftermarket setup, but I have read on here about a guy named Tom Moss that does porting of the lower intake real cheap. Will a ported lower work as well as a Cobra?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 17, 2004
#2
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #2
There is very little difference between the Cobra lower and the tmoss lower...and the tmoss would be cheaper...

Do a search for his name and send him a PM and he'll get you fixed up...

The lower is the bottleneck between it and the upper...
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Sep 17, 2004
#3
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #3
Why not just buy a used cobra or explorer intake and get that ported? If you're looking for 300hp you're going to need a nice floring intake, heads, and exhaust. There are people on here with H/C/I's are making a little over 300hp and under 300rwhp.

I'd ditch the stock intake and buy an Edelbrock Performer 5.0 or buy a used Cobra/Explorer and have that ported to reach your goal
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 17, 2004
#4
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #4
1105 said:
Why not just buy a used cobra or explorer intake and get that ported? If you're looking for 300hp you're going to need a nice floring intake, heads, and exhaust. There are people on here with H/C/I's are making a little over 300hp and under 300rwhp.

I'd ditch the stock intake and buy an Edelbrock Performer 5.0 or buy a used Cobra/Explorer and have that ported to reach your goal
Click to expand...
Except I would get a nice FLOWING intake instead of a floring one
 
I

iowabowhunter

Member
Mar 24, 2004
62
0
7
Sep 17, 2004
#5
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #5
So explorer and cobra intakes are the same? Also thinking about going with a set of P-heads, good or bad idea? I need a set of headers anyway, and I think Ford motorsport makes them for the P's. Or should I just save my money and go with a set of Roush or Trick Flow? Basicly what I'm looking for guys is a strong fun street car that will be bracket raced once in a while on the weekends.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 17, 2004
#6
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #6
Yes the Cobra and Explorer are the same. GT-40p heads can make good power for a street stang. As you know (I hope) aluminuim heads are better all around. But plenty of people are making good power with the p heads. As far as headers me personally would go Mac long tubes they work with those heads with out any mods.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 17, 2004
#7
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #7
Check out the FAQ sectio up top they have some users combos and the power they made.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Sep 17, 2004
#8
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #8
5spd GT said:
There is very little difference between the Cobra lower and the tmoss lower...and the tmoss would be cheaper...

Do a search for his name and send him a PM and he'll get you fixed up...

The lower is the bottleneck between it and the upper...
Click to expand...

I re-dyno'd here recently swapping from a tmoss stock lower to his Cobra lower...I netted 10 ponies in the deal...Im at 302FWHP...as said...the stock lower is pretty damn good for the power range your shooting for...I run a Steeda 19 cam though...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 17, 2004
#9
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #9
RIO5.0 said:
I re-dyno'd here recently swapping from a tmoss stock lower to his Cobra lower...I netted 10 ponies in the deal...Im at 302FWHP...as said...the stock lower is pretty damn good for the power range your shooting for...I run a Steeda 19 cam though...
Click to expand...

A ported Cobra?
 
I

iowabowhunter

Member
Mar 24, 2004
62
0
7
Sep 17, 2004
#10
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #10
stupid ?

What "key words" should I use in the FAQ search to pull up some of these power combos? I tried a few different ones but reall didn't get any results.
BTW thanks for all the input guys.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 17, 2004
#11
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #11
No the first tread is the FAQ section Look at the first post/tread
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Sep 17, 2004
#12
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #12
Here you go http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=334773
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 17, 2004
#13
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #13
Some of you guys need your eyes checked. He said 300 FLYWHEEL hp. He does NOT need heads and he does NOT need to port an aftermarket intake.

Heres what WILL work since my friend had what you want. He had a cobra intake, c&l maf, gay shorty headers and full exhaust and pulleys. He did 245rwhp in his sn95. Something like that will do what you want BUT use longtubes and get a bigger TB. Whatever size the inlet of your manifold is, run that size TB
 
R

Road_Runna

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2002
594
6
39
Ogden, UT
Sep 18, 2004
#14
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #14
Grn92LX said:
Some of you guys need your eyes checked. He said 300 FLYWHEEL hp. He does NOT need heads and he does NOT need to port an aftermarket intake.

Heres what WILL work since my friend had what you want. He had a cobra intake, c&l maf, gay shorty headers and full exhaust and pulleys. He did 245rwhp in his sn95. Something like that will do what you want BUT use longtubes and get a bigger TB. Whatever size the inlet of your manifold is, run that size TB
Click to expand...

Full exhaust, Intake manifold, TB, Pulleys. Except on the long tubes, Their was a thread that shorty's make more HP according to 5.0 magazine. Long tubes are more for just the sound of the car.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 18, 2004
#15
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #15
=Road_RunnaTheir was a thread that shorty's make more HP according to 5.0 magazine. Long tubes are more for just the sound of the car.
Click to expand...

Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong!

Shall I say it again?
 
J

Jeff672000

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2001
86
0
0
Utah
Sep 18, 2004
#16
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #16
Grn92LX said:
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong!

Shall I say it again?
Click to expand...


One more time please
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 18, 2004
#17
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #17
Grn92LX said:
Some of you guys need your eyes checked. He said 300 FLYWHEEL hp. He does NOT need heads and he does NOT need to port an aftermarket intake.

Heres what WILL work since my friend had what you want. He had a cobra intake, c&l maf, gay shorty headers and full exhaust and pulleys. He did 245rwhp in his sn95. Something like that will do what you want BUT use longtubes and get a bigger TB. Whatever size the inlet of your manifold is, run that size TB
Click to expand...

I don't "some of you guys" saying anything about 300rwhp and not referring to the flywheel horsepower...1105's post was kind of confusing and can see where you got that from...but he is the only one I see...

There is absolutely nothing wrong with shorty headers...they can flow just as well as longtubes can...as long as the shortys don't become a restriction...and I can't see where they would with out more air being forced through it along with a h/c/i combo (referring to supercharger)...

245rwhp is not 300bhp...though it makes it much closer...

Bigger is not always better

To the original poster...get a 65mm TB
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Sep 18, 2004
#18
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #18
Long tubes help with scavenging, its not about how much they flow. My roomate gained 8hp switching to long tubes, and he gained alot in the midrange.

Check out the 5L Ford dyno tests book, it says pretty much the same thing.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 18, 2004
#19
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #19
5spd GT said:
I
There is absolutely nothing wrong with shorty headers...they can flow just as well as longtubes can...as long as the shortys don't become a restriction...and I can't see where they would with out more air being forced through it along with a h/c/i combo (referring to supercharger)...
Click to expand...

Been there/done that. LT's are WAY better. I dont race peak #'s on the dyno, but check out the under the curve gains on LT equipped cars vs shortys. Its awesome to say the least. I've seen a few dynos with that swap. I've also seen track times with LT swaps on stock and h/c/i cars. LT's own, end of story.

245rwhp is not 300bhp...though it makes it much closer...
Click to expand...

Do the math, it sure is. Its between 245-255 depending what kinda loss you use.


To the original poster...get a 65mm TB
Click to expand...

I just happen to have one for sale, a MINT accufab 65mm with egr Buy mine You should match the TB to the inlet of the aftermarket intake, but at that power level its probably not a big deal. There was a dude in another thread I was posting in maybe a month ago and posted his gains by going with a 70mm TB and then to a 75mm TB on his bolt on 94/95 cobra. He GAINED 9hp over stock with a 70mm and then he GAINED 4hp with the 75mm. Anyway, buy my 65mm accufab
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 18, 2004
#20
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #20
Grn92LX said:
Been there/done that. LT's are WAY better. I dont race peak #'s on the dyno, but check out the under the curve gains on LT equipped cars vs shortys. Its awesome to say the least. I've seen a few dynos with that swap. I've also seen track times with LT swaps on stock and h/c/i cars. LT's own, end of story.



Do the math, it sure is. Its between 245-255 depending what kinda loss you use.




I just happen to have one for sale, a MINT accufab 65mm with egr Buy mine You should match the TB to the inlet of the aftermarket intake, but at that power level its probably not a big deal. There was a dude in another thread I was posting in maybe a month ago and posted his gains by going with a 70mm TB and then to a 75mm TB on his bolt on 94/95 cobra. He GAINED 9hp over stock with a 70mm and then he GAINED 4hp with the 75mm. Anyway, buy my 65mm accufab
Click to expand...

My friend (again in the 90 gt) had BBK longtubes on his car...supposed 347 (ran with my bolt-on, full exhaust, 373'd car)...and he had some sort of rusty (other than stock headers...possibly the ford racing headers?)...and he gained...no difference in time but finished .5mph faster...so in this example and many I have seen...longtubes are NOT way better...harder to install for the HP you gain...Shorty's are just fine...

Actually it is closer to 290hp...and I did do the math

I know for a fact you would gain horsepower with those "bigger sizes"...but I'm looking for E.T. gains here...not peak horsepower numbers...
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

95-early 97 Explorer upper and lower intake manifold - NO LONGER NEEDED
  • R82148V
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
3
Views
280
Want to Buy Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
  • Locked
SOLD 93 cobra intake manifold
  • Jimmer009
  • Jan 19, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
3
Views
486
Engine and Power Adder Jan 22, 2025
Jimmer009
J
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?