• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech

Intakes that require a tune

  • Thread starter Thread starter LIZARDKING
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2006

LIZARDKING

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
21
14
28
Hell
Jan 14, 2006
#1
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #1
Why do they require a tune? I know the MAF tube is larger. Do you install the stock MAF into the larger tube? That would require a tune.

What size is the stock 4.0 MAF? How about the TB? If they are the same size, how is a larger MAF tube helping?

What size is the GT MAF and TB? Are they the same size or mismatched?

Intakes dont seem to add much hp. Im trying to figure out why.
 
J

Jimp

New Member
Apr 9, 2005
486
0
0
Jan 14, 2006
#2
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #2
If you have more air coming into the engine, you need more fuel. You have to keep the air/fuel ratio correct for the car to run right. That's the simplified explanation, I'm sure someone else will come along and add a bunch of technical mumbo-jumbo and big words and make me feel dumb.
 

LIZARDKING

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
21
14
28
Hell
Jan 14, 2006
#3
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #3
Ok, but if the TB and MAF tube are the same size, increasing just the MAF tube will not put more air into the engine.

Im running the stock intake. I want to do some research before I buy.

It seems that they are mostly for cosmetics.

I like a stock look. I dont want an open element filter. Im still waiting to see if Volant comes through with an 05 system.
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
Jan 14, 2006
#4
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #4
The stock air box actually does quite well... up to about 4,000 RPM... that is when you'll feel your car pull a little stronger with an good aftermarket intake kit..

Ok... the car's computer calculates the amount of air coming in based on the size of the MAF housing, using the MAF sensor... Now if you change the MAF housing size you'll throw off the air volume calculation. The car's computer will actually think there is LESS air flowing than there really is... when that happens the car's computer actually supplys to little gas causing the car to run lean. To lean and you'll get a CEL..

Here's the dyno showing my stock air box vs the C&L... and while the dyno only shows about a 6RWHP it seem to make a noticable difference on the street over my old MMR... I think the dyno doesn't tell you everything... LOL

 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
Jan 14, 2006
#5
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #5
scrming said:
The stock air box actually does quite well... up to about 4,000 RPM... that is when you'll feel your car pull a little stronger with an good aftermarket intake kit..

Ok... the car's computer calculates the amount of air coming in based on the size of the MAF housing, using the MAF sensor... Now if you change the MAF housing size you'll throw off the air volume calculation. The car's computer will actually think there is LESS air flowing than there really is... when that happens the car's computer actually supplys to little gas causing the car to run lean. To lean and you'll get a CEL..

Here's the dyno showing my stock air box vs the C&L... and while the dyno only shows about a 6RWHP it seem to make a noticable difference on the street over my old MMR... I think the dyno doesn't tell you everything... LOL
Click to expand...

The C&L made 6 more RWHP than the MMR? Or am I reading that totally wrong?
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
Jan 14, 2006
#6
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #6
Excepcion13 said:
The C&L made 6 more RWHP than the MMR? Or am I reading that totally wrong?
Click to expand...

that dyno is the stock air box vs a C&L with just fuel added, not a performance tune...

The C&L was about 3RWHP better tahn the MMR...

here's the C&L vs the MMR:



I also noticed that the dyno does tell the whole story... the C&L seemed to perform noticably better on the street... more
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
536
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
M
93 5.0 Microsquirt with Stage 3 trickflow tuning issues
  • marxpreston11
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 25, 2026
Mustang5L5
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
238
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
839
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?