• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Is 99 GT , Better, Faster than 5.0,s????

  • Thread starter Thread starter revedup
  • Start date Start date Feb 9, 2007

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 9, 2007
#1
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #1
Gear heads
Who,s ever had experience with the 99 up GT,s
In handling Braking aceleration????
In ease of maintenance?
In parts availability and price?
In durability??
Overall a better performance machine????
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Feb 9, 2007
#2
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #2
revedup said:
Gear heads
Who,s ever had experience with the 99 up GT,s
In handling Braking aceleration????
In ease of maintenance?
In parts availability and price?
In durability??
Overall a better performance machine????
Click to expand...


Stock for stock???

Braking, yes
handling, yes
acceleration, yes
maintainence, about the same, but new cars are always easier to maintaine
plenty of parts, just slightly higher cost than 5.0 parts but not the drastic difference there was a few years ago.


If i never owned a Mustang before and was looking to get into them, i would buy the '99+. They are a good starting point and getting cheaper in price. They respond well to mods too and it's pretty easy to make 300HP at the flywheel with bolt ons. The heads are far more superior than the old E7 castings.

Of course this is a 5.0 forums, but i base my statement on the fact that I own an 88 5.0 and an '03 GT
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Feb 9, 2007
#3
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #3
stock for stock any modular is going to rape a 5.0. Throw a couple bucks at both cars and the tabels completly turn.
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Feb 9, 2007
#4
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #4
i want a 99+

 
M

MustangGT95

New Member
Jul 29, 2003
407
1
0
Feb 9, 2007
#5
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #5
99 up is going to own a fox in every way. Handling and breaking would be close to a 94/95 but the power is much better.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Feb 9, 2007
#6
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #6
Depends what you want... If your mechanically inclined, can turn a wrench and want to feel like you made the car do what its doing, Id say get the 5.0. After doing bolt ons, most 5.0 guys will rip them apart and do the typical HCI, whereas most 4.6 guys seem to slow down with bolt ons, or throw boost at them. I would say being as they are both easy to mod, make fast, handle and brake well, get the one you like the styling of more.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 9, 2007
#7
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #7
Having owned both a 93 and 00, the 00 was quicker, handled better, braked much better, etc.

4.6L's do cost a bit more in parts, they are newer...it happens
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Feb 9, 2007
#8
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #8
My 07 does everything better and faster then my 90, except in the handling catigory, but the 90 isn't stock in that aspect.
 

JGT

Member
Oct 29, 2006
0
0
7
Charleston, SC
Feb 9, 2007
#9
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #9
i have a 3.73 rear end and exhaust and i've beaten every one i've raced.
my $.02
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Feb 10, 2007
#10
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #10
My 92 GT has 3.55s and I feel it was quicker in the bottom end than my 02 GT, but as you get higher in the Revs the 02 started to come on strong.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Feb 10, 2007
#11
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #11
There are no aftermarket heads/intake worth buying for the 2V 4.6 which is a major drawback. Get a 99-01 Cobra instead they have alot more potential and well worth the extra $$
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Feb 10, 2007
#12
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #12
stock for stock they are faster but foxes are cooler IMO. the 5.0 has more low end grunt and always seems more powerful. the modulars have this "building up" feeling and dont feel as fast to me.
 

93 teal terror

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
971
62
69
Durham N.C.
Feb 10, 2007
#13
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #13
After owning a 93, 02gt and an 03 mach.....I think we all know which one wins
But its all a matter of opinion as to which one you like the best. The 99+ cars do handle, brake, offer more power stock than the 5.0's but I still like my 93 the best. Thats why when given the option of selling the mach or the 5.0, I kept the 5.0. I should have taken the brembo's off the mach before I traded it in. Do you think they would of noticed if it came with 4 lug ponys
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Feb 10, 2007
#14
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #14
with gears, exhaust and shifter my 03 gt went 13.38 and would wax the hell out of my 88 with the same mods!
 

DEFWISH

Member
Feb 25, 2006
87
0
8
Wichita, Ks
Feb 10, 2007
#15
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #15
93 teal terror said:
After owning a 93, 02gt and an 03 mach.....I think we all know which one wins
But its all a matter of opinion as to which one you like the best. The 99+ cars do handle, brake, offer more power stock than the 5.0's but I still like my 93 the best. Thats why when given the option of selling the mach or the 5.0, I kept the 5.0. I should have taken the brembo's off the mach before I traded it in. Do you think they would of noticed if it came with 4 lug ponys
Click to expand...

LMAO nope... but those brembo's would of been VERY nice
 
8

89tang

Founding Member
Oct 20, 2000
2,508
0
0
Newark ohio
Feb 10, 2007
#16
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #16
revedup said:
Gear heads
Who,s ever had experience with the 99 up GT,s
In handling Braking aceleration????
In ease of maintenance?
In parts availability and price?
In durability??
Overall a better performance machine????
Click to expand...


Stock for stock the 99+ will beat the 5.0 in almost all those area's. But i will say they are not easy to work on. I've helped tear a 4.6 completely out and put a stroked 4.6 with all the bolt ons on it and it was a major PITA.

And the 99+ performance hasn't impressed me at all either, my 5.0 with H/C/I would walk away from the above 4.6 and it has stage 2 heads and cams along with the stroked 4.6 it was making 300+rwhp i forget the exact numbers. But then again i'm sure that 4.6 with the same amount of boost i'm running now would probably whoop my ass, they seem to do really well with boost.

Braking is good and handling is good also i liked running the 4.6 down the track and knew it was going to stop easier then the 5.0. Durability, that probably depends who you talk to, the stock SOHC motor i think is very weak.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
937
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
769
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?