• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

is a 3" exahust too big?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolblue65
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2007

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Oct 1, 2007
#1
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #1
Like the subject says, is a 3" exahust pipe diameter too big? Reason I am asking is that currently I have an old rusted 2.25" system with no x or h-pipe, and flowmaster mufflers that I have been looking to upgrade, especially since I put in the DSS 347 which should be a solid 430 HP (+/-15).

The standard kit choices are 2.5" tubing, but there are a couple that you can get 3", I know the 3" will be louder but I am not sure how much (not too concerned about noise though) and I know the larger 3" will probably cost me a some low end ponies, but is it negligible? because I am assuming I will gain plenty up top by not having the 2.25" tubing, and traction down low is already an issue.

thanks
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 1, 2007
#2
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #2
2.5" is plenty.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Oct 1, 2007
#3
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #3
D.Hearne said:
2.5" is plenty.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I lost a tenth in the 1/8 on motor when I went to 3in with the old setup.
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Oct 1, 2007
#4
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #4
yes
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Oct 1, 2007
#5
  • Oct 1, 2007
  • #5
for you YES; I need it because I have a 550HP Big Block.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Oct 2, 2007
#6
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #6
3" will be almost twice as loud as 2 1/2.

You say you won't care but you will.
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Oct 2, 2007
#7
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #7
Go with mandrel bent 2.5". I was contemplating the same change a while back on my 347 that is built very much like yours. I was swayed away from the 3" by people that have it saying that it is MUCH louder than the 2.5" pipes.
Plus, your cam is the roller version of my XE274H so you will not be seeing the high side of 6500 rpm anyway.

FWIW: I have run 11's in my 347 with slightly lower compression than yours, smaller carb, same intake, flat XE274 to your roller, and same gears. All through 21/2" h pipe, flowmasters, and 2 1/2" tailpipes.
 
C

chromedog

New Member
Jan 13, 2006
554
0
0
worlds center for speed
Oct 2, 2007
#8
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #8
my main issue with anything over 2 1/2 (besides noise) is the clearance between the drivers side leaf spring, and gas tank... i have 2 1/2, and even that is tight.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Oct 2, 2007
#9
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #9
2.5" for sure- I work for MagnaFlow and have the 2.5" kits on all 3 of my Stangs that are within the same hp range as yours-

If you were making closer to 500hp, then I would say to start looking at the 3" kit-
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Oct 2, 2007
#10
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #10
OK its unanimous, thanks everyone, makes that decision easy.

Vinyl66- did you run mid 11's on street tires or on some form of radial/drag tire? My goal is low 12s on street tires and 11s on drag tire. Hoping to make it to the track in the next few weeks.

GNN60GT500- do you have any sound clips of your Mustangs? I have not heard a Magnaflow system in person and would like to.
 
C

chromedog

New Member
Jan 13, 2006
554
0
0
worlds center for speed
Oct 2, 2007
#11
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #11
you wont be sorry with the magnaflows... go to their website, as they have soundbites of various cars. i REALLY like the sound of mine (hedman shorties, mandril bent, with x pipe, through 2 1/2" tailpipes)
 
6

67staaang

Member
Mar 30, 2005
132
0
16
Oct 2, 2007
#12
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #12
sorry to hijack the thread but would you guys rather have x pipes or h pipes?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 2, 2007
#13
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #13
X pipe or what I built for my 89 V8 Ranger--- this is a single 5"Dia. x 12" Long exhaust pipe, welded in twin 2.5" pipes in both ends to create an "equalizer chamber, in effect the twin 2.5's go in, then exit back to twin 2.5's then into the turbo mufflers. Sounds smooth and has a nice mellow tone. Full tail pipes out the rear.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Oct 2, 2007
#14
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #14
D.Hearne said:
this is a single 5"Dia. x 12" Long exhaust pipe, welded in twin 2.5" pipes in both ends to create an "equalizer chamber, in effect the twin 2.5's go in, then exit back to twin 2.5's then into the turbo mufflers. Sounds smooth and has a nice mellow tone. Full tail pipes out the rear.
Click to expand...

Thats basically what my '92 vette has stock.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Oct 2, 2007
#15
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • #15
considering a single 3" pipe can handle 400HP, then dual 3" is too big unless you plan on putting out in excess of 600HP
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Oct 3, 2007
#16
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #16
coolblue65:

I have never raced on my 245/45 street tires. And I really don't want to either. Too much feathering of the throttle and too much tire spin. I use 235/60/15 MT drag radials at the track. Even using those, I will still spin on the line if I hammer the throttle as opposed to quickly rolling onto the throttle.

Let us know how it performs at the track. Good luck and have fun!!
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Oct 3, 2007
#17
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #17
coolblue65 said:
OK its unanimous, thanks everyone, makes that decision easy.

Vinyl66- did you run mid 11's on street tires or on some form of radial/drag tire? My goal is low 12s on street tires and 11s on drag tire. Hoping to make it to the track in the next few weeks.

GNN60GT500- do you have any sound clips of your Mustangs? I have not heard a Magnaflow system in person and would like to.
Click to expand...


There is a sound clip of my 67 up on the website- but it wont be very accurate to you car as the motor in the 67 is a 428 with 11:1 compression-

http://www.magnaflow.com/04sound/04american.asp

(you have to go towards the bottom to find it)

I do have the system on a car with a 351W and a 302- and the car with the 302 sounds incredible- definitely the best sounding out of all 3 IMO- which is what your car would sound like with the 347-

For that car- wait until the next NASCAR race, crank up the volume- and thats what it will sound like-
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
768
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
470
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
G
Drivetrain trickflow Stage 3 camshaft 347 stroker. also too much gear????
  • Gross Virgin
  • May 2, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
814
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2024
Gross Virgin
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?