CanadaStang
New Member
That's a really good point Airwolf, I should have tried it on a few different days to see if higher or lower air temp would change the results, also. For a more accurate test, a custom tune should have been done stock, and again after removing the snorkle, to correct any lean/rich spots.AirWolf87 said:Thats one persons findings...at least you come with back-up. I acctualy did the same thing last time i went to the track and i noticed basicaly the complete oposite you did. i ran an average of .17 slower with the snorkle and the fastest time of the day (the one in my profile) was without it.
The prob with these tests is that its impossible to duplicate a run...average is close but not acurate enough. A dyno is more accurate, but many things can affect it also. Bottom line, as 007 rudely pointed out, its a seat of the pants thing...take it out, see if you like it and make a desision. For me, any loss or gain that might come of it is completely overshadowed by the cool sound of the engine without it.
The results I got, were for my car only, and not a tried and true test, as Airwolf pointed out, not all Stangs may respond the same as mine.