• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Is a T-Rex pump really needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KasperG
  • Start date Start date Dec 8, 2005

KasperG

New Member
May 20, 2005
38
0
0
Dec 8, 2005
#1
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #1
If you replace your main fuel pump with a 255 unit; are you still in the need of a t-rex. Assuming you are running a Vortech or any other supercharger. This might be a dumb question, but I think that a 255 per hour pump should provide enough fuel. Please prove me right or wrong
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Dec 8, 2005
#2
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #2
yeah, i was actually told at my tuner that i should get an inline pump in addition to my 255 hp. I guess its a good idea, but i dont know the specific horsepower that a 255 can support, if i actually need one. Same question as you i guess lol.
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Dec 9, 2005
#3
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #3
It's my understanding that the T-rex is actually a restriction if you have the 255, because it's only a 190. I'm hoping that someone that really knows will chime in, because I HAVE a T-Rex and a 255 in-tank.....
 

KasperG

New Member
May 20, 2005
38
0
0
Dec 10, 2005
#4
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #4
anybody???
 

KasperG

New Member
May 20, 2005
38
0
0
Dec 10, 2005
#5
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #5
41. Can I use a 190 liter per hour fuel pump by itself and eliminate the T-Rex?
It is not suggested that the 190 LPH fuel pump be used without the T-Rex fuel pump. The biggest single contributing factor to engine damage is inadequate fuel delivery. Supercharged applications should have excess capacity rather than inadequate capacity as the damage that can be incurred is far more expensive to repair than the cost of the fuel pump.
I Got this off the vortech website.... so i quess that if they are not sure that a 190 would supply it, then a 255 should be fine.:SNSign:
 
B

blown&stroked

New Member
Jul 30, 2005
6
0
0
Dec 10, 2005
#6
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #6
I have a 255 and a 190 and when I had my last tune at HPP Manny told me that I needed more fuel and suggested that I go with a Waldon pump,but it will have alot to do with your engine combo.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Dec 10, 2005
#7
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #7
Yes you need a inline pump..I recc a 255
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 10, 2005
#8
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #8
I actually just got back from the dyno today. With my combo I made 325/348 and I was on the verge of going lean almost every pull at the top end. I only have a 255 in tank. If that gives you any idea of what is required. They finally got it to a safe air fuel on the last pull.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 10, 2005
#9
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #9
FlyBy763 said:
I actually just got back from the dyno today. With my combo I made 325/348 and I was on the verge of going lean almost every pull at the top end. I only have a 255 in tank. If that gives you any idea of what is required. They finally got it to a safe air fuel on the last pull.
Click to expand...

Are you still using stock tb, cam, & heads?

If so, I would think with the 255 pump and 42's, you would not be working that fuel system so hard to go lean like that.

Was your fuel pressure really elevated?

Think your fuel filter might have some kind of issue that may be causing a restriction?

Not sure why ...... but that just don't seem right to me

Grady
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Dec 10, 2005
#10
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #10
final5-0 said:
Are you still using stock tb, cam, & heads?

If so, I would think with the 255 pump and 42's, you would not be working that fuel system so hard to go lean like that.

Was your fuel pressure really elevated?

Think your fuel filter might have some kind of issue that may be causing a restriction?

Not sure why ...... but that just don't seem right to me

Grady
Click to expand...

Yep, Stock Heads, Cam, Throttle body...

Fuel pressure is like 36 with the vacuum line off I believe...I forget what they told me they left it at...34 or 36. The fuel filter is only a year old so I wouldnt think its really that bad, I could be wrong though.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Dec 10, 2005
#11
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #11
sorry to hijack the thread, but i also have the 255 high press. intank, and i guess my next question would be, what is a good inline pump that wont restrict the intank?
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Dec 11, 2005
#12
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #12
On 42s, 255 intank/inline on a S-trim @13psi i ran outta fuel at 580rw...the inline helps a TON.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
179
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 28, 2026
from6to8
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?