• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Is this good turbo cam or .......... ????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slow5.0
  • Start date Start date Oct 28, 2005

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Oct 28, 2005
#1
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • #1
Can someone tell me little bit more about this cam and is this cam good for Turbo 8-12psi on (306/331/247)

Advertised duration @ .006____ 270/280
Duration @ 0.050____________ 218/228
Lobe lift @ cam______________.340/.340
Gross cam lift with 1.6________ .544/.544
LSA_______________________112

Please don't go Off Topic
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Oct 29, 2005
#2
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #2
i would go for alittle more lsa say around 114
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 29, 2005
#3
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #3
i've read and heard that the stock cam is pretty perfect for a turbo... ever considered staying w/ the stocker?
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 29, 2005
#4
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #4
I dont know much about spec'ing cams but the stocker can make more than enough power to split the block. If you already have one, you might want to just stick with that to save some cash.
 

2L8ULUZ2

Will kiss Moderator ass for title
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2000
3,033
14
99
WNC
Oct 29, 2005
#5
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #5
I would stick a stock cam in it if you are going to run a turbo. My brother has a 94 Cobra with a T-64 turbo with tfs heads, intake, etc and at 8psi it made 496hp and right at 600ft.lbs at the wheels so the stock cam is more than enough for a stock block with a turbo kit and will make good power.
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Oct 29, 2005
#6
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #6
2L8ULUZ2 said:
I would stick a stock cam in it if you are going to run a turbo. My brother has a 94 Cobra with a T-64 turbo with tfs heads, intake, etc and at 8psi it made 496hp and right at 600ft.lbs at the wheels so the stock cam is more than enough for a stock block with a turbo kit and will make good power.
Click to expand...

Thats what i looking for around 450HP and 500TQ
 

donkey_punch

New Member
Jan 16, 2004
565
0
0
northern****ingjersey
Oct 29, 2005
#7
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #7
ernie, your B-31 cam would most likley make more. with the power band to 6500. you would shatter your hp goal. isn't that cam for a power adder?

and also the fact that i want to see what it will do with a turbo. cause i was thinking of swappng out my 2031 cam for the B-31 if my turbo kit ever get installed.

good luck


BTW what is the name (brand and name) of cam that you specifided above?
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Oct 29, 2005
#8
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #8
B-31
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 29, 2005
#9
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #9
Slow5.0 said:
B-31
Click to expand...


Thats a blower cam as u know which is much different than a turbo cam i believe. A turbo cam should be a reverse split design favoring the intake on duration with a tad less on the exhaust would be optimal.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 29, 2005
#10
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #10
donkey_punch said:
ernie, your B-31 cam would most likley make more. with the power band to 6500. you would shatter your hp goal. isn't that cam for a power adder?

and also the fact that i want to see what it will do with a turbo. cause i was thinking of swappng out my 2031 cam for the B-31 if my turbo kit ever get installed.

good luck


BTW what is the name (brand and name) of cam that you specifided above?
Click to expand...


Its a blower cam so i would think there are better turbo cams out there. That cam isnt a reverse split which is what i thought is best or better for turbo setups.

Hey ernie, are u gonna upgrade the block?
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Oct 29, 2005
#11
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #11
nmcgrawj said:
Its a blower cam so i would think there are better turbo cams out there. That cam isnt a reverse split which is what i thought is best or better for turbo setups.

Hey ernie, are u gonna upgrade the block?
Click to expand...

Yeah,i will post abot that later, now i tryin figure out can i use this blower cam with Turbo,if not WHY NOT
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 29, 2005
#12
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #12
Slow5.0 said:
Yeah,i will post abot that later, now i tryin figure out can i use this blower cam with Turbo,if not WHY NOT
Click to expand...


You can use whatever cam you want with the turbo and still probably make enough power to make you smile. Turbos like reverse split designed cams...that B-31 is not reverse split. From just talking to Ed C. and reading on turbomustangs, thats the type of cam you want. Turbos work best with RS cams.
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Oct 29, 2005
#13
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #13
Well i sound like stupid,but oh well

Whats is reverse split on cam
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 29, 2005
#14
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #14
Slow5.0 said:
Well i sound like stupid,but oh well

Whats is reverse split on cam
Click to expand...


I dont know specifics or anything. I just know when talking with ed that a stocker will work, but a reverse split with about 230 on the intake and a little less on the exhaust will work better than a stock cam. Ofcourse this is with my setup...not yours. But the same idea should apply.

Hopefully one of the guys will chime in with more cam knowledge. Or just go to hardcore50 and search reverse split. I know one of the cam guys on the west coast i believe do reverse split cams. I remember talking to them back when i was custom cam searching.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 29, 2005
#15
  • Oct 29, 2005
  • #15
Here is something Ed C said to me... "Turbos like the RS profiles. They need air in but it is not as critical to
get it out. As you know, turbos need heat and exhaust pulse to spin, the RS
do this."
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Oct 30, 2005
#16
  • Oct 30, 2005
  • #16
So Turbo supposed to push air inside head fast but not too fast go in exhaust, i think i got it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
289 cam break in help
  • iaff284
  • Aug 19, 2022
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
809
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2022
iaff284
I
M
Engine Cam Question
  • Middleagecrisis
  • Jan 10, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 14, 2022
Middleagecrisis
M
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
C
Engine Turbo 306 Running Hot
  • CPalmer72
  • Aug 14, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2019
CPalmer72
C
S
How Does This Combo Look? (fti Cam, By Ed Curtis)
  • stealth886
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2016
cleanLX
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?