• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

is this overkill for a stock engine??

  • Thread starter Thread starter D's 91 stang gt
  • Start date Start date Jul 27, 2005
D

D's 91 stang gt

New Member
Jul 6, 2005
43
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#1
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #1
just wondering if this setup that I'm in the process of doing is going to be to much for a stock motor? I've got bbk 1'5/8 long tube headers and matchin off rad x-pipe,mac underdrie pullies, mac direct shot cold air, accufab 70mm throttle body, c&l 76mm mass air, 24 pound injectors, and a elerbrock rpm performer two intake. My question is more geared towards the throttle body,mass air and intake are these to big for a otherwise stock motor should I go with 65mm throttle body and a 73mm mass air? or will my cobination work out and run fine. any suggestion are welcome
thanks
 

Thenemesis

Member
Nov 16, 2004
321
0
17
chuckletown, sc
Jul 27, 2005
#2
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #2
nah your fine.. better to buy big instead of buyin small then havin to buy big again just bc they dont flow as good as the heads you put on in the future..
 

rio95

Member
Nov 18, 2003
829
1
17
Grand Rapids, MI
Jul 27, 2005
#3
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #3
why would you get all of that with stock heads? You won't need the injectors and you won't benefit much from the rest.
 

fordman54935

Member
Jan 10, 2003
301
0
16
Wisconsin
Jul 27, 2005
#4
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #4
rio95 said:
why would you get all of that with stock heads? You won't need the injectors and you won't benefit much from the rest.
Click to expand...


Agreed. Invest in some good heads if you really want to haul. The RPM 2 will not be worth the money with the stock heads. Even keeping the stock cam with good heads will make good power.
 
D

D's 91 stang gt

New Member
Jul 6, 2005
43
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#5
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #5
what I was saying is that I'm just buying parts right now and just want to no if I intsalled all this stuff right now would the car run good or run like crap in a few months I'l be stoking it to a 347 most likly so I'll just tryin to by things piece by piece and installing in them instead of all at once.
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#6
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #6
buy all the stuff and put it in a box somewhere until you have ALL the parts you need, then put it all together at once
 
D

D's 91 stang gt

New Member
Jul 6, 2005
43
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#7
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #7
what if i put on every I mentioned before but leave off the intake untill I get the heads and stuff what that work out ok?
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Jul 27, 2005
#8
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #8
Headers and intermediate pipe will be a nice addition.
C'n'L will make a nice addition, but, I'd order a sample tube for 19lb inj's for the time being, as, there is no need for the 24's, not sure you'd get a nice spray out of the larger inj., but, I'm guessing.
Personally, I'd not bother with the intake, it's runners will be much larger than the ports on the heads, creating a ridge/ledge, and, that's not desirable. That, an I'm not sure the stock cam/heads will benifit from a short runner intake. I would think that intake would provide lazy air given the stock cam/heads.
70mmtb is much larger than the opening on the stock intake, so, again, ridge/ledge. That, and, the stock 60mm TB is plenty to feed stock heads.
Now, if you were to try the rpm intake and like it, then the 70mm tb would work.
 
D

D's 91 stang gt

New Member
Jul 6, 2005
43
0
0
Jul 27, 2005
#9
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #9
thanks clean lx so your saying for now just keep the stock injectors forget about the intake for now and get a smaller throttle body would a mac 65mm throttle be good?
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Jul 27, 2005
#10
  • Jul 27, 2005
  • #10
just run the stock tb for now (you can go well into the 12's with the stock tb) and hold onto the 70mm until you are running an intake other than the stocker.

i really don't think the 24's are going to work well at the ~220hp range... so, ya, I'd keep the stock 19's on for now.

I don't know what your future plans are, but, that rpm is a lot of intake. Personally, I'd consider trading it for a standard performer. that would work well with your 70mm tb and stock heads... and... support some decent heads on down the road.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
810
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
348
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
H
turbo advice
  • hawkinsdrag
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
631
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
hoopty5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?