• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Jags xk8 xjr8 1998 should I?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chefster
  • Start date Start date Aug 17, 2008

chefster

New Member
May 24, 2004
426
1
0
michigan
Aug 17, 2008
#1
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #1
Thinking of parking the Cobra and buying a 98 Jag xjr 4 litre supercharged, please any feed back on the 98 jags and should it be an Xk8 or xjr? Thank You
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 17, 2008
#2
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #2
Not my style really, don't know much about'em either.

For the money i would venture to say you'd be better off with that era M3 or equivalent.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Aug 17, 2008
#3
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #3
If i could roll in a XKR I'd be all over it...the only thing I'd check out is the ownership cost. Insurance, routine maint. Also check the reliability. There's an old rule: don't have a british car as your daily driver!
 

chefster

New Member
May 24, 2004
426
1
0
michigan
Aug 17, 2008
#4
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #4
They are going for about 8 grand..,the xk8 looks pretty cool. My stangs got 180 + k right now so I am lookin around, any suggestions.?..it has to be a Ford
 

chefster

New Member
May 24, 2004
426
1
0
michigan
Aug 17, 2008
#5
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #5
it 'll be a daily driver.
 
N

Nine4FiveO

New Member
Nov 23, 2004
12
0
0
Alberta
Aug 18, 2008
#6
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #6
Jag used nikasil to line the cylinders up until about 2000. The nikasil was known to fail with the use of high sulphur gas which was removed from use around 2000. A blow-by test should be done before even considering a purchase.

There are concerns with the secondary timing chain tensioners which can fail typically on 97-99. A typical r&r would be around 1K for just the secondaries if nothing else is bad (primaries). A third generation tensioner was developed (standard on 2003+) and is made of steel instead of plastic. If the plastic tensioners fail and the chain breaks or skips two teeth on the cam gear you will have to replace the engine.

The 97-99 were also known to have faulty water pumps where the vains would break off causing over heating. They also had faulty throttle bodies that should have been replaced under warranty.

These issues were corrected by 2001 mostly. For 2001 the cylinders were steel lined and the water pump issue was corrected. 2000-2002 use second generation secondary tensioners which are still plastic but seem to hold up better.

I have a 2001 xjr and it is the best car I have ever driven. The interior quality, ride, comfort is impeccable. They do not carve cornerns like a bimmer but I could car less as mine is a highway cruiser.

I would recommend an xjr if possible. With 370hp and 387lb-ft they are a blast to drive. I have hardly driven my stang since picking up the Jag. An xjr should be mid 5 sec to 60 and mid 13's in the 1/4.

The engine is basically the same as the 4V Ford just smaller in displacement and making more power/litre
 

cobraclutch

Founding Member
Sep 3, 1999
878
12
49
I'm so L.A.
Aug 18, 2008
#7
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #7
Nine4FiveO said:
Jag used nikasil to line the cylinders up until about 2000. The nikasil was known to fail with the use of high sulphur gas which was removed from use around 2000. A blow-by test should be done before even considering a purchase.

There are concerns with the secondary timing chain tensioners which can fail typically on 97-99. A typical r&r would be around 1K for just the secondaries if nothing else is bad (primaries). A third generation tensioner was developed (standard on 2003+) and is made of steel instead of plastic. If the plastic tensioners fail and the chain breaks or skips two teeth on the cam gear you will have to replace the engine.

The 97-99 were also known to have faulty water pumps where the vains would break off causing over heating. They also had faulty throttle bodies that should have been replaced under warranty.

These issues were corrected by 2001 mostly. For 2001 the cylinders were steel lined and the water pump issue was corrected. 2000-2002 use second generation secondary tensioners which are still plastic but seem to hold up better.

I have a 2001 xjr and it is the best car I have ever driven. The interior quality, ride, comfort is impeccable. They do not carve cornerns like a bimmer but I could car less as mine is a highway cruiser.

I would recommend an xjr if possible. With 370hp and 387lb-ft they are a blast to drive. I have hardly driven my stang since picking up the Jag. An xjr should be mid 5 sec to 60 and mid 13's in the 1/4.

The engine is basically the same as the 4V Ford just smaller in displacement and making more power/litre
Click to expand...
My uncle recently bought a 2001 XJR. They're not really my style but it's a hell of a nice car, and has great power. Like you said it's not quite a "performance" sedan but a luxury car with some grunt. I manged to egg my uncle on while driving my '92. I know that a mildly modded AOD isn't exactly a good barometer but I have to say that thing can move. We went from about a 30-mph roll and by the time I hit 40 he was long gone.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Aug 18, 2008
#8
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #8
Wouldn't the xkr's be quite a bit more than a xk8? I just like the look an the fact u don't see them every other car like u do the bimmers.
 

chefster

New Member
May 24, 2004
426
1
0
michigan
Aug 18, 2008
#9
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #9
Y ai just looked at the car on the way home tonight. The Xjr is definetly a sled....alot a stuff packed into it. No room to work on the engin. Did i see suspension rigs on it that look like air diaphrams? Ya its old tech...heavy. Think I'll pass. I do like the styling..but appears to get worse gas mileage than my Cobra.:SNSign:
 

chefster

New Member
May 24, 2004
426
1
0
michigan
Aug 18, 2008
#10
  • Aug 18, 2008
  • #10
It was interesting to look at.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
344
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
S
Hi. I'm new. 98 Cobra Bent Axle.
  • sbk93036
  • Mar 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
88
The Welcome Wagon Mar 28, 2026
AeroCoupe
Fox Ideas for Theft Deterrence in Storage
  • Clutchfork
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 1, 2025
91AOD5.0LX
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
823
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
B
Trying to determine if I have a bad ECM; 98 Cobra
  • b4unoit
  • Aug 19, 2025
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
6
Views
444
SVT Tech Forum Sep 14, 2025
b4unoit
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?