• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Just added this to my collection with my current 2001 Mustang GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter RED2001GT
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Apr 16, 2008
#21
  • Apr 16, 2008
  • #21
How come you have a picture of a V6 in your sig?
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
Apr 16, 2008
#22
  • Apr 16, 2008
  • #22
i almost thought that was the new camaro (even though I know it's not out yet)
 

3-0-II

Member
Oct 24, 2006
110
0
17
Redwood City, CA
Apr 16, 2008
#23
  • Apr 16, 2008
  • #23
Mmmm charger
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Apr 16, 2008
#24
  • Apr 16, 2008
  • #24
My girlfriend and I said when we get married we are going to by a charger for a family car. Of course I would still have the stang also. Nothing wrong with having a little fun in a family car .
 
C

ceracer33

New Member
Aug 30, 2005
118
1
0
Apr 17, 2008
#25
  • Apr 17, 2008
  • #25
nice man, i really like those cars. i agree that it shouldnt have been called a charger, but none the less i think they are the best family car out there right now. its exactly what my fiance would be driving if we could afford it. i manage a body shop and do a ton of work for the local dodge dealership, so i have driven many many of these cars. they ride good and have plenty of power. the srt8 version is just plain sick. i love the seats in them. as long as u get atleast the 5.7l hemi ur in good shape. that 2.7l v6 has NO balls lol.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Apr 17, 2008
#26
  • Apr 17, 2008
  • #26
Well, I just ran across a RT today. I noticed he had his window down so I decide to let him hear what a stang sounds like screaming buy at 4+k, I dropped it in third and past him. He quickly got behind me and tried to follow but could not catch up to me. They are fast but not as fast as a bolt on GT. We cruised for about a half hour till I took my exit to work. Every time I would punch it he wasn’t able to keep up. As I took my exit we both gave each other the thumbs up. His exhaust sounded nice though.
 

RED2001GT

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 18, 2003
270
2
18
Apr 30, 2008
#27
  • Apr 30, 2008
  • #27
ceracer33 said:
nice man, i really like those cars. i agree that it shouldnt have been called a charger, but none the less i think they are the best family car out there right now. its exactly what my fiance would be driving if we could afford it. i manage a body shop and do a ton of work for the local dodge dealership, so i have driven many many of these cars. they ride good and have plenty of power. the srt8 version is just plain sick. i love the seats in them. as long as u get atleast the 5.7l hemi ur in good shape. that 2.7l v6 has NO balls lol.
Click to expand...

I really love my Charger R/T Road & Track. These cars have an excellent ride and they are very spacious inside. I love the 5.7 liter Hemi engine that it comes with. My Charger has 350 horsepower because it comes with the Road & Track Package. It also has 390 ft./lbs. of torque. I think that it's a very nice looking vehicle and I plan on keeping this car for a very long time. I am very happy that I purchased the Charger R/T with the Road & Track Package.
I also still have my 2001 Performance Red Mustang GT. My Mustang GT has almost 4,000 original miles on it right now.
 

RED2001GT

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 18, 2003
270
2
18
Apr 30, 2008
#28
  • Apr 30, 2008
  • #28
Sorry for the double post.
 

georgio440

Member
Nov 22, 2007
195
0
17
Walnut Creek, CA
Apr 30, 2008
#29
  • Apr 30, 2008
  • #29
Did your Charger, by any chance, come with the Road & Track package? I might have missed that.
 

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 30, 2008
#30
  • Apr 30, 2008
  • #30
I can't stand em.

Not because it's not a Ford. Because it's a Chrysler.
 

RED2001GT

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 18, 2003
270
2
18
May 3, 2008
#31
  • May 3, 2008
  • #31
georgio440 said:
Did your Charger, by any chance, come with the Road & Track package? I might have missed that.
Click to expand...

Yes it did. I ordered the Road & Track Package on my 2008 Charger R/T. I basically have the same exact options that come on the limited production Daytona except for the black decals and graphics. Everything else on my Road & Track is exactly the same as the Daytona. I basically have a "sleeper" Daytona Charger.
 

RED2001GT

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 18, 2003
270
2
18
May 3, 2008
#32
  • May 3, 2008
  • #32
geoffsgt said:
I can't stand em.

Not because it's not a Ford. Because it's a Chrysler.
Click to expand...

No difference at all. Both Fords and Chryslers both have their problems with quality and with mechanical issues.
 

Penguin

Active Member
Oct 23, 2003
115
1
28
SC
May 5, 2008
#33
  • May 5, 2008
  • #33
mixedbreed02gt said:
the new charger looks like anything but an old charger. it has 4 doors, and a crapamatic. the chargers of old had a 4 speed and 2 doors. the design is not consistent with an old charger.
Click to expand...
First off, old Chargers came with automatics also. I know it's hard to accept.

If you've ever seen a '66-67 Charger, that's what the new one looks more like. The '66-67 even looks big enough to be a 4-door, and they're huge on the inside.

If you look at the first Charger and not the redesign of '68-70, then I would say Dodge did fine. It's not their fault everyone remembers the "Dukes of Hazzard" year car.
 

eliteJAE

Member
May 29, 2007
0
1
16
Stanford University
May 5, 2008
#34
  • May 5, 2008
  • #34
georgio440 said:
Did your Charger, by any chance, come with the Road & Track package? I might have missed that.
Click to expand...

[/sarcasm] LOL
 

eliteJAE

Member
May 29, 2007
0
1
16
Stanford University
May 5, 2008
#35
  • May 5, 2008
  • #35
Penguin said:
First off, old Chargers came with automatics also. I know it's hard to accept.

If you've ever seen a '66-67 Charger, that's what the new one looks more like. The '66-67 even looks big enough to be a 4-door, and they're huge on the inside.

If you look at the first Charger and not the redesign of '68-70, then I would say Dodge did fine. It's not their fault everyone remembers the "Dukes of Hazzard" year car.
Click to expand...

just compared a '66 Charger with a new one......and you're right lol they sorta follow the same lines. Nailed it with the dukes of hazzard comment

btw, to the OP, NICE RIDE 350hp/390lbtq is sure as hell way more than i got, plus you got 4 doors extra body room FTW
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
4r70w transmission problems
  • Kiddmustang
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
118
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 21, 2026
squeak93
S
FUEL PUMP ALWAYS ON
  • Scwhitten
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
518
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 4, 2026
manicmechanic007
B
2001 v6 New compressor issue
  • badmech
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
99
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
badmech
B
M
Need help!
  • Masonevans726
  • Dec 17, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
245
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 17, 2025
Masonevans726
M
C
Replacing rear speakers in 01 GT mustang
  • CoopDawgyDawg
  • Mar 12, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
202
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?