• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

K Member/control Arm Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter DonaldShetter
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2014

DonaldShetter

New Member
Feb 26, 2014
15
0
2
Southern Indiana
Sep 17, 2014
#1
  • Sep 17, 2014
  • #1
I know I end up asking a lot of questions but I have done some research on the K member I would like to install. Its the MM KMember but my issue is that with the matching tublar lower control arms the cars front wheels get moved over 3/4s of an inch. Is there a Kmember/lower control arm combo that will not increase my wheelbase?
 

TeamCaffeineGT

Member
Mar 16, 2009
193
15
18
Springfield, MO
Sep 19, 2014
#2
  • Sep 19, 2014
  • #2
Don,
You might check out AJE Racing http://www.ajeracing.com/contact.php and use their tech contact with regard to the movement of the front tire with their kit.

UPR products offers a K Member that does not move the tire as stated in the products Q&A section. http://www.uprproducts.com/mustang-pro-series-chrome-moly-k-member-kit-96.html#3

I took a look at Maximum Motorsports website with regard to your concern. Here is the article that I read. http://www.maximummotorsports.com/tech_front_susp_kmember.aspx The movement of the front wheel, they claim gives a better weight distribution on the car.

Good Luck!
 

superstang01

Active Member
Oct 11, 2006
448
9
29
Kingston, On, Canada
Sep 19, 2014
#3
  • Sep 19, 2014
  • #3
I love my upr k member kit. Ive had it in for 6 years now with no problems
 
Reactions: Sharad

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Sep 19, 2014
#4
  • Sep 19, 2014
  • #4
^^Correct. UPR's k-member uses the stock locations. Also it's Made in America and carries a Lifetime Guarantee.

http://www.uprproducts.com/mustang-pro-series-chrome-moly-k-member-kit-96.html
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Sep 20, 2014
#5
  • Sep 20, 2014
  • #5
Got 2 years on my UPR chrome moly K member. I used spring perches and kept my stock control arms, C springs and struts. Really lets you get to everything under the engine bay.
 
Reactions: Sharad

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
Sep 24, 2014
#6
  • Sep 24, 2014
  • #6
UPR is the only ones i have used or sold in my shop.
 
Reactions: Sharad
S

silversmith82

Member
May 2, 2005
67
2
9
Sep 24, 2014
#7
  • Sep 24, 2014
  • #7
Why would you care if the arms are moved? They are moved because its better for handling and increases the wheelbase. There is no negative to moving the arms forward. If you are that worried about it though, they have rear offset arms that will keep the wheels in the stock location, it says so right on the website if you'd look.

IMO, UPR is a good K for drag racing and street driving where handling is not the #1 concern. Yes the UPR K can handle ok but not as well as the MM setup will. Conversely, the MM setup is damn near as heavy as the stock stamped piece and still isn't optimal for handling itself either. That distinction goes to the $4k+ SLA (short long arm) setups from Agent47 and Griggs. The MM setup is also $1100 more than the UPR.

All that said, if I am a stick shift street car that wants to handle well, I am getting the MM front kit with the forward offset arms to move the wheels up 1.5" which centers them in the wheel wells incidentally. If I am more concerned about straight line racing its hard to beat the UPR and it is fine on the street. If open tracking and serious then probably A47 front and eat Ramen for 6 months.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Sep 25, 2014
#8
  • Sep 25, 2014
  • #8
If you purchase the MM reverse offset a-arms along with the k-member, your wheelbase will remain unchanged from stock.
 

stangr5oh

Active Member
Dec 13, 2004
207
19
28
Patroling in my candy van - you want some candy?
Sep 28, 2014
#9
  • Sep 28, 2014
  • #9
Really it is all about preference and type of driving. UPR and MM both sell a great product respectively. The UPR kit advertises to lose 66lbs over stock vs MM advertising theirs at 40lbs over stock. The MM kit does allow for tire movement forward to give a better road course and track stability. But if you are only DD your vehicle, it is hard to pass up on the cheaper of the 2 and that is UPR, and more wt reduction to boot. They both have great warranty programs on their parts, so that is not even an issue. So once again it is purpose driven and preference to whom to go with.
 
S

silversmith82

Member
May 2, 2005
67
2
9
Sep 30, 2014
#10
  • Sep 30, 2014
  • #10
Eh, for DD its still all about your style of driving IMO. Lots of straight line and or an automatic, get the UPR or a Team Z. If you are a stick and like to fly around corners and have a lot of twisty roads near you... might want to look at the MM although the UPR will probably also be better than stock at least. The bigger issue with cornering AND launching in the pre S197 cars is that goddamn 4 link out back.
 

stangr5oh

Active Member
Dec 13, 2004
207
19
28
Patroling in my candy van - you want some candy?
Sep 30, 2014
#11
  • Sep 30, 2014
  • #11
quit stalking me!
 
S

silversmith82

Member
May 2, 2005
67
2
9
Sep 30, 2014
#12
  • Sep 30, 2014
  • #12
Nevarrr!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Suspension Lower control arms needed
  • racer_dave
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
278
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Feb 20, 2026
Noobz347
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
194
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 8, 2026
bjornsn95
B
G
2001 Mustang GT noise after header and control arm (x2) install
  • gilmo5
  • Jan 8, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
305
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 12, 2025
weendoggy
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
576
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
C
1965 Mustang Lower Control Arm Question.
  • chopper1876
  • Nov 9, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
952
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Dec 7, 2024
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?