Yea i mean thats pretty badass, but if they had saved a bit of money and put it into suspension they would be just as, if not faster. I would rather have a good handling car that is also fast in the straight line. I wouldn't say suspension is a waste
Its all in how he wants HIS car st up.
His cars aren't just for straight lining. They'll handle to. I've been out on the street with him and they can corner pretty damn good too.
Those examples are all well and good, but I don't see how they prove one point over another? I never said a car couldn't perform without one, but they will always run faster and handle better with one. The removal of the 90lbs from the car (especially off the nose) will aid it weight transfrer which will in turn improve ET's as well as handling. No, it's not a necessity, but neither are 10 1/2 wide wheels, excessivley large throttle bodies and full 3" exhaust systems on stock cars....but that never stops most people for putting them on? Every little bit helps.
Any future Mustang I build is going to get one. Weight savings being the main reason, but the additional room for aftermarket headers or general ability to work underneath unobstructed that they provide is a huge plus as well.
They may not be for everyones budget, but other than a person underspending on a cheap, low quality inferior piece, there are zero negative draw backs to having one.![]()
I was just showing that Mustangs can be pretty damn fast without the need for tubular suspension. This thread was about him replacing a stock K-member because his other one was bent, no because he is trying to mod his car. I was just trying to save the guy some money.
The 11-1/2 inch wheels are there for looks and traction. Nothing looks better than full size Mustang wheels with 345-30-18's on them.
Its all in how he wants HIS car st up.

