• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

K member

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangdrvr06
  • Start date Start date Oct 17, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Oct 26, 2008
#21
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #21
02nightmaregt said:
Yea i mean thats pretty badass, but if they had saved a bit of money and put it into suspension they would be just as, if not faster. I would rather have a good handling car that is also fast in the straight line. I wouldn't say suspension is a waste Its all in how he wants HIS car st up.
Click to expand...

His cars aren't just for straight lining. They'll handle to. I've been out on the street with him and they can corner pretty damn good too.

Gearbanger 101 said:
Those examples are all well and good, but I don't see how they prove one point over another? I never said a car couldn't perform without one, but they will always run faster and handle better with one. The removal of the 90lbs from the car (especially off the nose) will aid it weight transfrer which will in turn improve ET's as well as handling. No, it's not a necessity, but neither are 10 1/2 wide wheels, excessivley large throttle bodies and full 3" exhaust systems on stock cars....but that never stops most people for putting them on? Every little bit helps.

Any future Mustang I build is going to get one. Weight savings being the main reason, but the additional room for aftermarket headers or general ability to work underneath unobstructed that they provide is a huge plus as well.

They may not be for everyones budget, but other than a person underspending on a cheap, low quality inferior piece, there are zero negative draw backs to having one.
Click to expand...


I was just showing that Mustangs can be pretty damn fast without the need for tubular suspension. This thread was about him replacing a stock K-member because his other one was bent, no because he is trying to mod his car. I was just trying to save the guy some money.

The 11-1/2 inch wheels are there for looks and traction. Nothing looks better than full size Mustang wheels with 345-30-18's on them.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Oct 26, 2008
#22
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #22
SVT32VDOHC said:
This thread was about him replacing a stock K-member because his other one was bent, no because he is trying to mod his car. I was just trying to save the guy some money.
Click to expand...

+1

I'm glad I'm not the ONLY one who sees it this way.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 26, 2008
#23
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #23
SVT32VDOHC said:
I was just showing that Mustangs can be pretty damn fast without the need for tubular suspension. This thread was about him replacing a stock K-member because his other one was bent, no because he is trying to mod his car. I was just trying to save the guy some money.
Click to expand...

I understand what you're saying....and if he didn't already have to replace the K-member, I wouldn't have suggested it as a necessary expense, but it really makes no sense to me that someone would opt for a stock K-member if the old one was damaged and needed replacing anyway? For about the same money or less (based on what he was quoted) he could go with a superior aftermarket one and gain the advantages noted above. It’s win, win across the board and really a no brainer IMO?

This would also be a perfect time to add a set of long tube headers if it were ever on the horizon....because there's never going to be an easier or more opportune time to do it.
Rusty67 said:
+1

I'm glad I'm not the ONLY one who sees it this way.
Click to expand...
See above.
 

blckstng96

Member
Apr 13, 2004
208
0
16
Oct 27, 2008
#24
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #24
i have the upr set up in my car,i love it.it looks great for shows or just that clean look,it drops weight but the main reason i did it was for clearence,that thing has opened up so much room and makes dealing with exhaust issues and such soooooo much easier.in my opinion it could make me slower and id still get it for the clearance alone.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Oct 27, 2008
#25
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #25
I here that. My L/T's on my Cobra are a joke to try and do anything to. I wish I'd never have done them. Althought they did add quite a bit of power. Just make sure youre trans and clutch are in good shape before installing them.
 

stangdrvr06

New Member
May 17, 2006
42
0
0
Oct 28, 2008
#26
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #26
thanks for the input guys. In a way i am tryna mod the car. So the aftermarket piece wouldn't be dissapointing to me. I just wanted the cheaper alternative but also somethin that would help out the car. I wanted to know the people that installed the aftermarket k members. Did you guys use ur stock struts or had to go with aftermarket ones. I would like to keep the stock ones but if not then i don't have a problem replacing them.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Tuesday at 4:25 PM
FastDriver
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
Build Thread 1978 Fairmont. I bet somebody back home’s thinkin’…I wonder why he don’t write..?
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Aug 27, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 137 138 139
Replies
3K
Views
382K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 7, 2025
Rdub6
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
D
Bent control arm? k member?
  • detonate69
  • Feb 6, 2012
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
4K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 6, 2012
Kornnut
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?