• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

KB Dyno #s

  • Thread starter Thread starter el_kid_1
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 28, 2003
#41
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #41
I just got an e-mail from Ken @ KB and he is saying that if in fact my A/F numbers (13.5:1) are correct, it could be due to my BBK air intake tube.

... "If there are any bends in a tube just before the mass air meter, this will cause serious errors in the maf output, especially at higher rpm."...

My BBK CAI is the fender one...I will try installing the stcok tube along with the air box and see what happens. Any opinions?
 

GT_2001

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2001
179
0
16
Cambridge, ON Canada
Dec 28, 2003
#42
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #42
el_kid_1 said:
I just got an e-mail from Ken @ KB and he is saying that if in fact my A/F numbers (13.5:1) are correct, it could be due to my BBK air intake tube.
Click to expand...

Wow! That seems lean to me! I've always heard that you want about 12-12.5:1 for any car running a power adder!

Good Luck!
 
D

Dig-It

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
120
0
0
Carrollton, VA
Dec 28, 2003
#43
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #43
el_kid_1 said:
I just got an e-mail from Ken @ KB and he is saying that if in fact my A/F numbers (13.5:1) are correct, it could be due to my BBK air intake tube.

... "If there are any bends in a tube just before the mass air meter, this will cause serious errors in the maf output, especially at higher rpm."...

My BBK CAI is the fender one...I will try installing the stcok tube along with the air box and see what happens. Any opinions?
Click to expand...

What after market Cold Air Intake Kit (including KB's) doesn't have a bend in the tube just before the MAF?
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
53
129
Jacksonville, FL
Dec 28, 2003
#44
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #44
Damn, I am going to be ordering my KB in a month when I get back from deployment............Looks like you guys are having a hell of a time with it so far.........RED DRAGON, Are you have drivabilities besides what you posted above?? I plan on getting the 9psi IC kit also, with the big tue kit included. I live in maine, which I'm sure is just as cold as where you are. Ahh man. I really want that KB, but I don't know about all these problems you guys are having. I'm just REALLY worried about detonation. Thanks for the help.
~DAN~
 
D

Dig-It

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
120
0
0
Carrollton, VA
Dec 28, 2003
#45
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #45
At ease, Dan. Not everyone has had problems. From what I've read, there's just been a few.
 

GT_2001

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2001
179
0
16
Cambridge, ON Canada
Dec 28, 2003
#46
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #46
Hey Dig iT do you have a dyno sheet of your car!
Those numbers are awsome! I would love to see the torque curve!
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 28, 2003
#47
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #47
Dan_Soprano said:
also, did you think about your fuel filter or the pump itself???
Click to expand...
I don't think that is the cause. My car hardly sees the pavement...it only sees about 4,000 miles per year, but I will have it check it anyways.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
53
129
Jacksonville, FL
Dec 28, 2003
#48
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #48
Dig-It said:
At ease, Dan. Not everyone has had problems. From what I've read, there's just been a few.
Click to expand...
Dig-it,
Did you get your tune right off the bat, or did you drive with the KB tune for awhile?? If so, which one do you like better......sounds stupid, I know, just looking at your #'s after the tune should tell me. Also, are your power and torque curves with the new tune as consistant as they were with the KB tune?
Thanks for your time.
~DAN~
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 28, 2003
#49
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #49
Dan_Soprano said:
Damn, I am going to be ordering my KB in a month when I get back from deployment............Looks like you guys are having a hell of a time with it so far.........RED DRAGON, Are you have drivabilities besides what you posted above?? I plan on getting the 9psi IC kit also, with the big tue kit included. I live in maine, which I'm sure is just as cold as where you are. Ahh man. I really want that KB, but I don't know about all these problems you guys are having. I'm just REALLY worried about detonation. Thanks for the help.
~DAN~
Click to expand...
It is KB's opinion that the equipment that was used to read the A/F ratio on my car is malfunctioning nor is the appropriate one. Ken said that they have seen the A/F to vary a lot from their numbers. And I honestly have to tell you that if had not been because I hit the Dyno last Friday, I would be thinking that the car is at its optimum performance because I have not felt any hitching or detonation. The car feels very light with the new found power and drives like a silk. I have floored it one or two times and man, my car wants to eat the pavement. So, go get your KB S/C kit as I know you will love it. Ken also added that the 368 rwhp that I got @5300 rpm is very close to their numbers at the same rpm. Had it continued to the 6000 rpms, I would have easily reached the 400 rwhp mark. From my dyno graph you can see that the curve still has a tendency to continue climbing even @ the cut-off.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
53
129
Jacksonville, FL
Dec 28, 2003
#50
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #50
el_kid_1 said:
It is KB's opinion that the equipment that was used to read the A/F ratio on my car is malfunctioning nor is the appropriate one. Ken said that they have seen the A/F to vary a lot from their numbers. And I honestly have to tell you that if had not been because I hit the Dyno last Friday, I would be thinking that the car is at its optimum performance because I have not felt any hitching or detonation. The car feels very light with the new found power and drives like a silk. I have floored it one or two times and man, my car wants to eat the pavement. So, go get your KB S/C kit as I know you will love it. Ken also added that the 368 rwhp that I got @5300 rpm is very close to their numbers at the same rpm. Had it continued to the 6000 rpms, I would have easily reached the 400 rwhp mark. From my dyno graph you can see that the curve still has a tendency to continue climbing event @ the cut-off.
Click to expand...
Do you think that the dyno was off as far as your torque #'s?? It seems just from your graph that the guys you took it to were kind of clueless as far as its proper operation. I think that you should have been WAY over 400rwtq.
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 28, 2003
#51
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #51
Dan_Soprano said:
Do you think that the dyno was off as far as your torque #'s?? It seems just from your graph that the guys you took it to were kind of clueless as far as its proper operation. I think that you should have been WAY over 400rwtq.
Click to expand...
Could be...I will have it dynoed at another dyno on Wednesday. Although the only dyno that has the equipment for measuring A/F is the one that I visited last Friday.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
53
129
Jacksonville, FL
Dec 28, 2003
#52
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #52
el_kid_1 said:
Could be...I will have it dynoed at another dyno on Wednesday. Although the only dyno that has the equipment for measuring A/F is the one that I visited last Friday.
Click to expand...
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 28, 2003
#53
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #53
Well, here are more testing results. Since it is Sunday and the expressway is very light in traffic, I went to try the car out. I was able to shift all the way up to 4th gear and here are the RPMs at which the rev limiter kicked in:

1st (@6100)
2nd (@6100)
3rd (@6100)
4rd (@5300)
5th (?)

The dyno guy was right, the rev limiter kicked in at 5300 on 4th gear Why is this happaneing?
 

B C

New Member
Jun 5, 2003
444
0
0
Chino, CA
Dec 28, 2003
#54
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #54
I didn't realize you were actually running the BBK. The 90mm maf and their CAI is the way to go.

On the dyno, make sure they go through the gears and into 4th. Tell them you want it , want numbers at WOT for 2500 rpm's through 6100. They might not be familiar with running a dyno on a Mustang.

Oh wait. You were hitting the rev limiter at 5300? Wow. something isn't right.
 

DeadLurker

Daily Driven
Sep 7, 2001
7,702
0
0
New York
Dec 28, 2003
#55
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #55
el_kid_1 said:
Well, here are more testing results. Since it is Sunday and the expressway is very light in traffic, I went to try the car out. I was able to shift all the way up to 4th gear and here are the RPMs at which the rev limiter kicked in:

1st (@6100)
2nd (@6100)
3rd (@6100)
4rd (@5300)
5th (?)

The dyno guy was right, the rev limiter kicked in at 5300 on 4th gear Why is this happaneing?
Click to expand...

hmmmmmm
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 28, 2003
#56
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #56
DeadLurker said:
hmmmmmm
Click to expand...
Strange right? Tell me about it. KB says that the mono-chip programming is OK and does not need to be re-tuned.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
53
129
Jacksonville, FL
Dec 28, 2003
#57
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #57
el_kid_1 said:
Strange right? Tell me about it. KB says that the mono-chip programming is OK and does not need to be re-tuned.
Click to expand...
WOW that is weird!!!! It has to be a program thing with the computer...How fast were you going at 5300 RPM in 4th??
 

snoopy98

Founding Member
May 11, 2002
518
0
0
florida,jacksonville
Dec 28, 2003
#58
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #58
kenne bell

rules !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Dec 28, 2003
#59
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #59
Dan_Soprano said:
WOW that is weird!!!! It has to be a program thing with the computer...How fast were you going at 5300 RPM in 4th??
Click to expand...
I was going at 135 mph, but I have not recalibrated my speedo for gears. It felt REALLY FAST! I thought the car was going to take-off!
 

CTGrey02

Founding Member
May 22, 2002
1,403
0
0
Bristol, CT
Dec 28, 2003
#60
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #60
5300??? The rev limiter is computer controlled. That sounds like something got overlooked. Are any of the other KB guys like red dragon seeing that???
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
J
351w swap in 2004 questions (set up like a 95 Cobra)
  • jonathansw1601
  • Mar 24, 2018
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2018
jonathansw1601
J
T
Progress Thread Rebuilt Motor, S/c, Do My Numbers Make Sense?
  • Tonto674
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 19, 2016
Tonto674
T
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
R
Engine 1992 Mustang Hesitation/Cutting-Out
  • RTW0223
  • May 2, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?