• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

KB install progress

  • Thread starter Thread starter 04GTMustang
  • Start date Start date Aug 16, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 16, 2008
#1
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #1
wel we started the KB install today. we worked about 8 hours on it today with a few speed bumps. one when we took off the fuel rail one of our o rings on the injectors popped off and fell in the spark plug holes and was wedged up against the spark plug and took a while to get out lol.

we got most of it done all we have left is the intercooler and boost a pump. so maybe 2 hours tomorrow and its done. also when we were putting on the lowering bracket for the altenator one of the holes was not drilled out to well and we had to use a tap kit to finish the threads and then everything after that went perfectlly.

i am very excited to fire her up tomorrow and then let my brother drive it

damn broken bones
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Aug 16, 2008
#2
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #2
Dude thats awesome, but sucks that you can't be the first to drive her. I wouldn't let anyone drive it before me.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Aug 16, 2008
#3
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #3
it's gonna be fun!!!
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 16, 2008
#4
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #4
Nice, the anticipation builds!!!
 
M

mat82284

Member
Jul 31, 2003
889
1
16
Aug 16, 2008
#5
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #5
I hope you have a built bottom end, I have seen and heard to many hore stories of people who installed there kenny bell to only have a blown engine in return. Kenny bell usually puts people at 425+hp which is 25 to much on our stock blocks. I would suggest going to get a dyno tune at 400hp to be safe, if you dont you'll be tearing that supercharger off to get to the engine which wont be fun. Those rods are extremely weak past 400hp. Good choice on blower though, now upgrade internals. Which version do you have 1.7 or 2.3?
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Aug 16, 2008
#6
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #6
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 16, 2008
#7
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #7
mat82284 said:
I hope you have a built bottom end, I have seen and heard to many hore stories of people who installed there kenny bell to only have a blown engine in return. Kenny bell usually puts people at 425+hp which is 25 to much on our stock blocks. I would suggest going to get a dyno tune at 400hp to be safe, if you dont you'll be tearing that supercharger off to get to the engine which wont be fun. Those rods are extremely weak past 400hp. Good choice on blower though, now upgrade internals. Which version do you have 1.7 or 2.3?
Click to expand...
i am building it next summer ill be fine on 9psi. i use to spray the crap out of the stock bottom end and i def. pushed the limits and it still runs very strong. Before the KB i could pull on stock mach 1s with me on motor. but next summer i am building it and getting ready for the compound boost system the following year.

LaserSVT said:
Click to expand...

lol man you sure you want pictures they are cell phone pictures so they are not very good at all.
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 16, 2008
#8
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #8






 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Aug 16, 2008
#9
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #9
Sweet!
Wish mine had a supercharger




 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Aug 16, 2008
#10
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #10
mat82284 said:
I hope you have a built bottom end, I have seen and heard to many hore stories of people who installed there kenny bell to only have a blown engine in return. Kenny bell usually puts people at 425+hp which is 25 to much on our stock blocks. I would suggest going to get a dyno tune at 400hp to be safe, if you dont you'll be tearing that supercharger off to get to the engine which wont be fun. Those rods are extremely weak past 400hp. Good choice on blower though, now upgrade internals. Which version do you have 1.7 or 2.3?
Click to expand...

my buddy has been running his KB at 443/461 for over 50K (all stock engine) with absolutely no issues. he even runs it on the high side of the KB switch chip at the track every month or so. and this is the off the shelf tune from KB. i wouldnt worry about turning it down at all!!
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 16, 2008
#11
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #11
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Aug 16, 2008
#12
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #12
I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not sure.
 

lazerred02

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
190
1
0
FT Stewart, GA
Aug 16, 2008
#13
  • Aug 16, 2008
  • #13
Looking good man, I am sure that the ride will be sweet even though you won't be the one driving it.
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 17, 2008
#14
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #14
LaserSVT said:
Sweet!
Wish mine had a supercharger




Click to expand...

i wish mine had a supercharger too. that kb doesnt do anything on the motor its just a model the screws dont move inside they just sit. its an all show no go car
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Aug 17, 2008
#15
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #15
SWEET! All show no go FTMFW!!!

So how long till you can drive it again? And I forgot, are you doing a custom tune or are you using the KB chip?
 

fudleyd

New Member
Jan 10, 2003
180
0
0
Littleton, CO
Aug 17, 2008
#16
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #16
Sweet man!! I am happy for ya, gonna be awesome! I am officially jealous...
Nice job on the install as well!
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 17, 2008
#17
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #17
well its all finished now. thing is sweet. I am using the KB chip for now until i switch over to the all the sct stuff and get a custom tune then im getting the pro racer stuff too so i can do my own tunes after i get one custom tune.

man that whine is the best. I am in love.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 17, 2008
#18
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #18
mat82284 said:
I hope you have a built bottom end, I have seen and heard to many hore stories of people who installed there kenny bell to only have a blown engine in return. Kenny bell usually puts people at 425+hp which is 25 to much on our stock blocks.
Click to expand...
425hp....at the flywheel maybe? If you're talking rear wheels (which I assume you are considering the stats quoted in the rest of your statement) I wouldn't worry about it being anywhere close to that. Although they make a nice kit and really streetable power, never buy into the inflated claims of Kenne Bell's advertised power levels. I've almost never seen anyone crack 400rwhp with the 9psi pulley on pump gas with either the 1.7 or 2.1L kit. 375-390rwhp with his car is probably closer to the mark and that’s taking into account his modest exhaust work.....and auto’s generally, make even less than that!

That being said, don’t get too wound up over dyno numbers 04GTMustang, you’ll still put enough jam down at the wheels to run into the 11’s with some traction and practice. And it’s going to make for a fun car any way you slice it.

mat82284 said:
I would suggest going to get a dyno tune at 400hp to be safe, if you dont you'll be tearing that supercharger off to get to the engine which wont be fun. Those rods are extremely weak past 400hp. Good choice on blower though, now upgrade internals. Which version do you have 1.7 or 2.3?
Click to expand...
I would agree with a dyno tune with any blower set up.....and yes, the rods (and to a greater extent the pistons) in the 4.6L engines are pretty fragile. One bad detonation under load is all it takes in some cases. Tuned conservatively, he shouldn’t have any trouble with it though. I have seen them survive under 500rwhp in the past though, so I would be more concerned with the state of tune, than I would the actual dyno numbers in most cases.

.....and it’s 1.7 or 2.1L, not 2.3L. That is unless he's replaced it with a Lysholm when none of us were looking?
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Aug 17, 2008
#19
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #19
Gearbanger 101 said:
425hp....at the flywheel maybe? If you're talking rear wheels (which I assume you are considering the stats quoted in the rest of your statement) I wouldn't worry about it being anywhere close to that. Although they make a nice kit and really streetable power, never buy into the inflated claims of Kenne Bell's advertised power levels. I've almost never seen anyone crack 400rwhp with the 9psi pulley on pump gas with either the 1.7 or 2.1L kit. 375-390rwhp with his car is probably closer to the mark and that’s taking into account his modest exhaust work.....and auto’s generally, make even less than that!
Click to expand...



KB 1.7 9 PSI, intercooled, O/R x pipe, everything else stock.....................

KB GT 1.7 9psi dyno video- Video
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Aug 17, 2008
#20
  • Aug 17, 2008
  • #20
yea im not worried about the dyno numbers really. ill get em where i want before too long. this thing is crazy though but its still no 200 shot lol
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Paint and Body Rotten moon roof trim
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
156
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 15, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
802
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
932
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?