• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

kenne bell or turbo???.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter four.six
  • Start date Start date May 11, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
F

four.six

New Member
Nov 27, 2004
443
0
0
Corpus Christi, TX
May 11, 2006
#1
  • May 11, 2006
  • #1
what do you all think about this turbo system?...

http://www.proturbokits.com/store/scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=126

or should i just go with a kenne bell 1.7??

thanks for the input guys!!!!
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 11, 2006
#2
  • May 11, 2006
  • #2
it says that you need to get the tubular K-member and coil-over set up for the turbo, its all on how much you want to spend and the KB wont need any of that swapped
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
May 11, 2006
#3
  • May 11, 2006
  • #3
The KB absolutely. Kenne Bell is a known quantity. That turbo kit looks cheesy to me from a vendor with far less reputation than KB.

Also, to turbo a 99+ properly takes twin turbo and will cost about $10,000 IMHO.
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
May 11, 2006
#4
  • May 11, 2006
  • #4
McTeague said:
The KB absolutely. Kenne Bell is a known quantity. That turbo kit looks cheesy to me from a vendor with far less reputation than KB.

Also, to turbo a 99+ properly takes twin turbo and will cost about $10,000 IMHO.
Click to expand...



Can you explain your theory on why it takes twin turbo to "properly turbo" a 99+
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
May 11, 2006
#5
  • May 11, 2006
  • #5
Because 2 > 1
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
May 11, 2006
#6
  • May 11, 2006
  • #6
That logic is pretty lame. I mean, their may be a technical reason to back your claim.. and I definitely like the idea of two turbos over one. I don't believe that you can back up the idea the twin turbo is the proper way simply because there are two turbos rather than one.


Single turbo kits can make as much power as twin kits given the right attributes.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 11, 2006
#7
  • May 11, 2006
  • #7
well a twin turbo set up due to there power gains are nice but the piping is more complex than a single turbo but the benefit from having a turbo is that its not belt driven and can make awsome power but hey its all on how much $$$$$ you want to spend
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
May 11, 2006
#8
  • May 11, 2006
  • #8
KB
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 11, 2006
#9
  • May 11, 2006
  • #9
if you have the money, you can't beat a turbo
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
May 11, 2006
#10
  • May 11, 2006
  • #10
exactly,.. sorry mcteague your wrong on this one. Even a single turbo will out perform a KB if it is sized correctly. A single turbo can make as much or more than twins. I dont know much about this kit, but I would go to www.turbomustangs.com and do some research on this kit. They will have reviews and feedback posted I am sure.

2/>1 when it come to turbos
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 11, 2006
#11
  • May 11, 2006
  • #11
Dan_Soprano said:
if you have the money, you can't beat a turbo
Click to expand...


exactly turbo twin turbo
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
May 11, 2006
#12
  • May 11, 2006
  • #12
I agree that turbo is better, I still think turbo is twice as expensive though...
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
May 11, 2006
#13
  • May 11, 2006
  • #13
have you considered the 2.2L KB?

with all the extra suspentin components I would get the KB 2.2L.

this will give you insane power potential. if you are willing to drop the money for the tubro kit the 2.2L is a no brainer to me.

although the 1.7L is plenty of power for a street car.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 11, 2006
#14
  • May 11, 2006
  • #14
McTeague said:
I agree that turbo is better, I still think turbo is twice as expensive though...
Click to expand...


it is due to all the piping and swapping that is involved like the K-member A-arms a few things why its more expensive but like they mentioned above if you gots the cash do it
 
J

JOHNS01GT

New Member
Feb 26, 2004
209
0
0
Vermont
May 11, 2006
#15
  • May 11, 2006
  • #15
Pro Turbo is in the May 06 issue of MMFF, Turbo Revolution. Pro Turbo apparently has been around for a while so I don't think quality will be an issue. It says you will need the tubular K, but who cares. If you have the money for a turbo, I hope you can scrape a bit more up and spring for the tubular K. I would go turbo all the way just because it's cool and makes mad hp. Good luck.
 

mustangman9812

10 Year Member
Jan 14, 2004
661
6
49
Mars Hill, NC
May 11, 2006
#16
  • May 11, 2006
  • #16
KB
 
A

a97mustang

New Member
Feb 2, 2006
61
0
0
Lincoln Park michigan
May 11, 2006
#17
  • May 11, 2006
  • #17
man thats me all the way.i read the site in it is just a waiting game,to get the turbo.guess ill have a s-trim and nx kit for sale soon.
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
May 11, 2006
#18
  • May 11, 2006
  • #18
A "well designed" turbo kit IS better than a blower IMHO. The problem is finding a really great kit. Everything has to be 'balanced' properly with a turbo. I'm sure there are some really good turbo kits around for 2v motors, but based on what I've seen in some of them, hands down I'd go with a Kenne-Bell blower. KB engineers their kits really well and they are dead reliable.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
May 11, 2006
#19
  • May 11, 2006
  • #19
Hellion makes a damn reliable kit. I know of 3 locally that have been on the car over 2 years with not one issue whatsoever,.. 875 HP on 20psi sound good enough? that is on a 4V.. but you get the drift.

I would like to add though a major positive for the KB is that it replaces the carp ford intake.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
May 11, 2006
#20
  • May 11, 2006
  • #20
A twin kit for 99-04 is $6300 direct from HP Performance. Full boosted, they push 1000+rwhp. They also include the suspension related pieces. They aren't tuner kits, they include injectors, MAF, chip, etc. Again, that's $6300. I priced them out locally, and found them for under 6.

A 9# KB costs what, 5 grand? And that's for 400ish rwhp. So bump it up to a 14psi and max out timing, then you're now pushing the limits of the supercharger, and still making not even 3/4 the power of a twin turbo kit that costs only a grand more.

This is how I reasoned myself in to picking the HP kit. If anything, its more appealing to me because not many people do it.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Kenne Bell Supporting Mods for 2002 GT?
  • Rembrant
  • Mar 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
675
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2025
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
J
Reduced power in 1st and 2nd gear
  • jimted79
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
309
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 25, 2025
Noobz347
Tunerstudio help / services
  • Kabuki_notch
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
269
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 2, 2026
Mustang5L5
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
787
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?