• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

kenne bell: stock gears ... ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackVert
  • Start date Start date Oct 21, 2005

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 21, 2005
#1
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #1
i'm thinking about going back to stock gears after getting the kenne bell in, since i will have no more worries about low end torque and it is a daily driver.

it would be really nice to turn 1700 rpms at 70mph on the highway. it'd also be really nice to have accurate odometer and speedometers again.

thoughts?
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Oct 21, 2005
#2
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #2
Is the KB already in?

I think I would get it in and drive it a bit first. I think 3.73's will be a bit much but 2.73's or 3.08's are probably not enough. I would think 3.23 or 3.55 would be perfect. If it were me I think I would jsut stay with the 3.73's though for the fact that you already have them and you are already having fun.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Oct 21, 2005
#3
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #3
kb says you don't need a 3.73. i say 3.27 with a .78 5th gear.
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Oct 21, 2005
#4
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #4
ill trade rear ends with you
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 21, 2005
#5
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #5
urban96 said:
ill trade rear ends with you
Click to expand...
what gears have you?
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Oct 21, 2005
#6
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #6
stock 2.73's
 

brian15

New Member
Oct 16, 2003
81
0
0
Oct 22, 2005
#7
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #7
ive always wondered what a low gearer 3.08 , 3.27 hell even 3.55 geared mustang with some power behind it would feel like .

if anyone has any experience with that let me hear about it
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
Oct 22, 2005
#8
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #8
I ran 3.73's on my car when it had a KB on it and it was just fine. With DRs traction was not a problem for me at the track. With my current combo I had to switch to 3.55's because I would rev the motor too high going through the traps. For around town, I can barely tell a difference - on the highway it is MUCH nicer with the 3.55s. I think a KB with 3.27s would be OK...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Kenne Bell Supporting Mods for 2002 GT?
  • Rembrant
  • Mar 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
681
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2025
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
571
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
738
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?