• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Kenne Bell w/ non-gt40/stock lower

  • Thread starter Thread starter Obsol3te
  • Start date Start date Feb 9, 2010

Obsol3te

Member
Jun 29, 2005
106
0
17
Feb 9, 2010
#1
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #1
Anyone run this combination at all? Just curious on some feedback. I have a trickflow r series upper and lower manifold on my engine and I might be picking up a 2.1L flowzilla kit. Just wondering if it would be worth anything to have a machine shop fab up an adapter plate to match the kenne bell to the trick flow intake.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Feb 9, 2010
#2
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #2
Honestly, there are better superchargers out there for the 5.0... The KB really shines on the modulars but not so much on the 5.0. If you are getting a killer deal on it, ya go for it though...
Kevin
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Feb 9, 2010
#3
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #3
I'ld bypass on that blower kit too regardless of the deal the cost of fabricating may not be worth it.
 

Jaym14

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
296
1
0
Long Island, N.Y.
Feb 10, 2010
#4
  • Feb 10, 2010
  • #4
I agree with the above posts. Kenne bell has the cool factor but they don't make more power than a good centri
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Feb 10, 2010
#5
  • Feb 10, 2010
  • #5
I think you might get a different opinion from kenne bell owners. I personally don't like them as much as a centri because they are harder to hook on the street with.
 

Obsol3te

Member
Jun 29, 2005
106
0
17
Feb 10, 2010
#6
  • Feb 10, 2010
  • #6
Wasnt asking much for an opinion on the blower. I don't mind if i'll make more power with a centrifugal supercharger. I know this. I know i cant intercool the supercharger either unless im adding some form of chemical. All I was asking was is it worth it to use a better flowing intake and the trouble of getting a plate fab'd up. or to just grab a gt40 lower and go that route.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Feb 10, 2010
#7
  • Feb 10, 2010
  • #7
In my opinion, a ported gt40 lower should flow enough
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Feb 10, 2010
#8
  • Feb 10, 2010
  • #8
strtrcr50 said:
In my opinion, a ported gt40 lower should flow enough
Click to expand...


absolutely..........when ported correctly. So what's the engine specs?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
A
1991 5.0 with HCI - started car, running for a few minutes, started pushing coolant into the overflow tank and then puking out from there. I'm lost
  • AmericanMuscle4.6GT
  • Oct 16, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 30, 2022
CAMTWO1070
B
For Sale 1986 Capstang (Part Capri & part Mustang) $12,000 Galena, Ohio
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 7, 2022
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?