• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Lightweight Driveshaft Recommendations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FenixBirdWing
  • Start date Start date Nov 16, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
F

FenixBirdWing

New Member
Oct 28, 2009
12
0
0
China
Nov 16, 2009
#1
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #1
Hey guys - I've been researching different options for the first mod to my new '09 GT. Contrary to what most people seem to do, I've settled on not getting a CAI/tune until later down the road (probably 2nd or 3rd mod). I've decided to go for a set of rear gears and driveshaft swap first. Figure the gear swap will require re-calibration of speedometer - this way I don't have to get a custom tune twice (once before gears and once after).

I think I'm set on the FRPP 3.73 gears (4.10s seemed like they might be a bit steep for a daily driver that sees a lot of highway mileage) and have seen a lot of recommendations to just have a Ford dealership put them in right the first time and hopefully reduce the chances of having to bring it back in for gear whine.

Figured since I'd be having the gears changed out, this would be a good opportunity to also swap in an aluminum (or other reliable light-weight) driveshaft. So far I've only checked out the Dynotech driveshaft - I was wondering if anyone else has had good/bad experiences with different driveshafts and/or any other thoughts/recommendations for a complete newbie like me??

Also, do you guys think swapping the stock S197 GT driveshaft with an aluminum driveshaft is something I could do in a driveway with 4 jack stands? I'm looking to do as much work on my own as I can with the tools I've got access to if only for the experience. I've heard changing the driveshaft isn't all that bad. On the other hand, I've read about nightmare experiences trying to change out the rear gears.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Nov 16, 2009
#2
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #2
I only have personal knowledge of some budies running the Spydershaft and none of them have ever had any problems. The driveshaft swap isn't too difficult. I haven't done one on mine yet. About the gear swap...unless you have the proper tools and knowledge using them, I'd pay the $500 (parts & labor) and have it done professinally. FRPP has been proven to be the gear of choice for minimal issues. What gears do you have now? If you have the 3.55s, I'd advise against the 3.73s unless you're going with a power adder. I've had the 4.10s in my car for about 74K miles now and I do all kinds of highway driving and I've never had an issue or been annoyed with the RPM range. There are even some that have 4.56s in their daily driver! When I don't have to drive my car about 25K-30K miles a year, I'm going to step up to the 4.56s!
 
M

MaxDestruction

Member
Dec 25, 2007
62
0
7
Nov 17, 2009
#3
  • Nov 17, 2009
  • #3
This is one of my past posts, may save time and energy on replies.

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/790019-spyder-shaft-dynotech-driveshaft.html
 

Casey4s

New Member
Sep 1, 2007
147
0
0
Woodbridge, VA
Nov 17, 2009
#4
  • Nov 17, 2009
  • #4
I have had a Spydershaft for over two years with no issues and no vibration at 120+ mph. There are several brands out there to choose from but I would personally avoid any with "adapters" instead of an exact fit.
 
L

Lifter583

New Member
May 29, 2008
26
0
1
Nov 17, 2009
#5
  • Nov 17, 2009
  • #5
I run a dynotech...it is perfect...
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Nov 18, 2009
#6
  • Nov 18, 2009
  • #6
Ron Leonard who owned and built the Spydershaft just sold it to JPC, not that it's a bad thing.

Irregardless, the Axle Exchange driveshaft who builds the driveshafts for Steeda seems to be the least problematic and I've never heard of vibration issues with it. Otherwise my second choice would be Dynotech. Both great products. I wouldn't waste my time with any other driveshafts.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Nov 18, 2009
#7
  • Nov 18, 2009
  • #7
The Axle Exchange is the only one I haven't read complaints on. It seems to be hit and miss with others if they vibrate or not. Alot of people have no problems but there are enough complaints to steer me away from other brands.
 

lightblade

Member
Aug 7, 2004
366
0
17
Nov 18, 2009
#8
  • Nov 18, 2009
  • #8
There is an option for rear end gear ratio to fix your speedo in the handheld tuners
 
F

FenixBirdWing

New Member
Oct 28, 2009
12
0
0
China
Nov 19, 2009
#9
  • Nov 19, 2009
  • #9
kooldawg6 said:
I only have personal knowledge of some budies running the Spydershaft and none of them have ever had any problems. The driveshaft swap isn't too difficult. I haven't done one on mine yet. About the gear swap...unless you have the proper tools and knowledge using them, I'd pay the $500 (parts & labor) and have it done professinally. FRPP has been proven to be the gear of choice for minimal issues. What gears do you have now? If you have the 3.55s, I'd advise against the 3.73s unless you're going with a power adder. I've had the 4.10s in my car for about 74K miles now and I do all kinds of highway driving and I've never had an issue or been annoyed with the RPM range. There are even some that have 4.56s in their daily driver! When I don't have to drive my car about 25K-30K miles a year, I'm going to step up to the 4.56s!
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure the stock '09 GT's come with 3.31s. That + slow throttle response (not tuned yet) = me getting tired of getting beat at the light (during daily driving) . Who knows tho - it could just be my driving

I was thinking 3:73s because I was afraid the jump to 4:10s would put me at a constantly high RPM range for highway traffic but now that I'm doing the math it might not be that bad - maybe like 3800 RPM @ 90 mph. You make me reconsider the 4.10s
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Nov 20, 2009
#10
  • Nov 20, 2009
  • #10
FenixBirdWing said:
I'm pretty sure the stock '09 GT's come with 3.31s. That + slow throttle response (not tuned yet) = me getting tired of getting beat at the light (during daily driving) . Who knows tho - it could just be my driving
Click to expand...

2005-2006 came with 3.55s standard in the manual cars.

2007+ came with 3.31s standard with the option for 3.55s in the manual cars.

I'm not quite sure about the automatics. I believe they have all came with 3.31s standard but 3.55s were an option.

Hope this helps.
 
L

lobe50

New Member
Jan 3, 2007
49
0
0
Nov 28, 2009
#11
  • Nov 28, 2009
  • #11
I have been researching this also. I am leaning towards the Axle Exchange or DynoTech pieces. I think like the fact that the DynoTech is 3 1/2" (the Axle Exchange and some others are 4"), I have read this gives the extra clearance that is sometimes needed, and something about the rotational mass as far as vibration??
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Nov 30, 2009
#12
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #12
lobe50 said:
I have been researching this also. I am leaning towards the Axle Exchange or DynoTech pieces. I think like the fact that the DynoTech is 3 1/2" (the Axle Exchange and some others are 4"), I have read this gives the extra clearance that is sometimes needed, and something about the rotational mass as far as vibration??
Click to expand...

The Axle Exchange is actually a tapered design so there is no issue with clearances.
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Nov 30, 2009
#13
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #13
I'm saving up for a shaftmasters unit.
 

ZeroLink

New Member
Nov 7, 2009
26
0
1
TX
Nov 30, 2009
#14
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #14
Last weekend I put in a Shaftmasters with the pinion adapter plate thingy. I also put in an adjustable UCA and mount to make sure I got the pinion angle right. It was all pretty easy, just time consuming if you don't have power tools. Overall I am really happy with it. It definitely makes a difference. I have some up close comparison pictures of the shaft, UCA, and mount if anyone is interested.
 
L

lobe50

New Member
Jan 3, 2007
49
0
0
Nov 30, 2009
#15
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #15
Cool...Post the pics if ya can...or PM me.
Thanks
 

ZeroLink

New Member
Nov 7, 2009
26
0
1
TX
Nov 30, 2009
#16
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #16
Here are some pictures of my Shaftmasters driveshaft, BMR UCA mount and BMR UCA.











Who doesn't like pictures right?
 
L

lobe50

New Member
Jan 3, 2007
49
0
0
Nov 30, 2009
#17
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #17
Sweet...Thanx!!
 

cusp

Member
Jun 13, 2009
61
2
19
Santa Barbara
Nov 30, 2009
#18
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #18
I went from 3.31s to 3.73s. The 3.73s are a little over board for what I use the car for but just barely. They represent a 12% RPM increase over stock. 4.10s are a 22% increase over stock and would be excessive in my opinion.

I went with the Coast ultralite 4" shaft which has a critical speed of nearly 8,000 RPM which with 27" wheel diameter and 3.73s would be good for over 190 MPH. Ought to be enough.

You will take a 10% cut in Highway MPG if that matters to you. Around town is up to you. The higher RPMs will allow you to get into the higher horsepower range sooner. But horsepower comes from gasoline. So with the lower gears you have the ability to burn more. If I granny drive in town I got a little increase in MPG.

The part you can feel. All the gears pull harder. 5th will now pull 6% grades at 55Mph where I would have down shifted into 4th below 60. It also picks up faster when lane jockeying. I can stay in 5th now where as before I would be taking 4th or even 3rd. Third is an awesome passing gear even up a grade. 2nd used to take me all the way up the on ramp and into lane position. Now I need to get into 3rd before lane position because 2nd is tapped out. Off the line hard be ready for the 1st 2nd shift to come up fast. I am seeing some black on the rear wheel well skirts although I am not hearing any squealing. When going slow, like in traffic jams or parking lots, 1st at idle seems to pull along better with less clutch feathering. I tend to agree with Mark at Coast drive line, The 3.73s are the best for the S197 GT for drive-ability and performance. 4.10 could be if the transmission were geared different. Especially a higher 1st.
Speaking of transmission gears, with a 3.73 rear, it would be interesting to change the 5th in the 3650 from its .68 to the optional .63. That would restore 5th back to its highway flier configuration and get back most of that MPG lost with the lower rear gears. I wonder how expensive that would be.

I vote for what I did. 3.73s for your daily driver.
 

PizzaDriver

New Member
Jul 6, 2009
20
0
1
Rapid City, SD
Dec 1, 2009
#19
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #19
thanks for the pics, zero. the new shaft looks so much sturdier than the old one.
cusp, did you see enough gain from the 3.73's to make the whole procedure worth it? i've got 3.31s now and would like to go with something bigger, but i don't want every gear to seem like a granny gear and be winding out on the highway. OTOH, i don't want to spend a lot of time installing 3.73s and then not be happy with them.
 

ZeroLink

New Member
Nov 7, 2009
26
0
1
TX
Dec 1, 2009
#20
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #20
No sweat. It is a LOT sturdier but what you can't see is how much it DOESN'T weigh. The weight difference is staggering. As for your gear choice issue, I just bought my 08 GT a little over a month ago. The guy selling it was so not wanting to tell me it 4.10s since he thought he might scare me off. I must admit I was concerned when he told me. Every other Mustang I have ever had had 3.73s. I drove the car and was amazed with the 4.10s. I drive the highway to work everyday and never get tired of it or think the engine is winding too high. The 3650's 5th gear is a lot better than the T-5s. That's just my 2¢.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
45
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
418
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Thursday at 8:57 AM
TPony
S
Drivetrain Downshifting from 3rd to 2nd issue
  • Scott_S
  • Apr 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
573
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 14, 2026
Mindseye007
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
216
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
340
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?