• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Longtube Headers vs. Shorties

  • Thread starter Thread starter hbk_136
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2004
H

hbk_136

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
194
0
0
Southeastern GA
Jun 24, 2004
#1
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #1
I know that longtube headers are better than shorties, but my question is how much better are they? Is it worth spending the extra $$ to get longtubes and have to get the matching X/H pipe? I already have an O/R H-Pipe, so i don't want to have to get another aftermarket X/H-Pipe, but i will if it's that much better performance-wise. I need some experienced help here, i just don't know anymore.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Jun 24, 2004
#2
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #2
I just made the jump from shorties to longtubes not too long ago. I really enjoy them. I think that i get more top end out of the car with the LTs. you can scan the classifieds and get a used set up cheap. then you can re-sell what you got and not come out too bad. I dont have any dyno #s for comparison, but i think that they were worth it.
 
S

Schlodes

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
354
0
0
Lidsville.... West side dawg..
Jun 24, 2004
#3
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #3
There was a header comparo in one of the mags a while ago... forget which one. But, it was a fairly well built motor..

Actually on the upper RPM band 1 5/8" equal shorties are basically equal to most longtubes [the recent mag test] on the HP numbers... Low RPM torque is a whole different story though and if I remember correctly, the longtubes had the shorties by more than 30 ft lbs under 3500 RPM...

But I am guessing that on a 300 - 350 flywheel HP 302 the losses in torque compared to shorties wouldnt be as bad...

This is all assuming a 425 HP street car buildup... If your engine is stock and will be for a bit, save on the headers, and leave your stockers... and port out the inlet where they go to the heads.. the stock headers work well up to about 280 HP.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jun 24, 2004
#4
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #4
Ok I did this to my bolt on Mustang and saw BIG gains, but Ill tell you exactly what I did and let you decide for me.

Old Combo: Mac shorties, Mac catted H.

New Combo (at the time): Mac Long Tubes, Mac Prochmaber and added pulleys.

The sizes all stayed the same (1 5/8" headers, and 2.5" h-pipe) but I also added the pulleys. I had gone 13.89 @ 97.9 with the shorties on ET Streets (17" tires up front). With the LTs, my first time back netted a 13.21 @ 101.1 with skinnies up front. Then a month or two later I rebuilt the traction loc and went 13.05 @ 103.4 with still no changes. This id NOT the norm, but this is how my car responded. My car has also killed batteries until I added pulleys, so my car isnt too normal, lol!
 

saleenx029

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
117
0
0
Cincinnati, Ohio
Jun 24, 2004
#5
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #5
I am told different by every person but I am told that the Long tubes are overkill on a stock style/ stock cubes(no Power adder) motor and you will lose bottom end torque, (longtubes seem to build hp more than torque IMO) but I am planning on adding alot more things in the future so I am putting the longtubes on my convertible and it is mostly stock. I think that with a few more mods it will start to help. Do some other mods at the same time you change the headers to ensure getting SOME power, if the longtubes seem too much for your application. I think that I did see some Dyno sheets one time that showed the longtubes adding a little power on a mostly stock motor, so I would do it. Don't forget e-check don't like longtubes. Just my .02
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Jun 24, 2004
#6
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #6
saleenx029 said:
I am told different by every person but I am told that the Long tubes are overkill on a stock style/ stock cubes(no Power adder) motor and you will lose bottom end torque,
Click to expand...

That is only the case if you install a header that is too large for the power you're making, and even so a longtube that is a bit too large will still outperform a short header of the same size primaries. I believe the stock headers are 1-1/2" primaries. If you install 1-1/2" longtubes, you WILL pick up torque. With 1-5/8" your torque increase will be seen a bit later in the rev range until you add power. With 1-3/4" or larger you are only going to gain power in the high RPMs until you are producing the appropriate exhaust flow to acheive good velocity.
 
S

Schlodes

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
354
0
0
Lidsville.... West side dawg..
Jun 24, 2004
#7
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #7
I agree that every car is a bit different... I dunno.

Back in 1997 I had a 1991 LX hatch 5 speed, had an AOD rear w/ 3.27 gears, M&H G 60 15s, U/D pulleys, a cone filter, timing, smog delete, no screen in MAF, no sway bar, exhaust was original, except for straight pipes in place of the stock mufflers and the car ran a best of 13.42 @ 100 MPH. The guy that bought it from me put an off road H on it, with some Flowmasters, stock headers still, a week later and went back to the track but cold only muster a 13.6 but went 102 MPH though... I remember we were all buggin him cause it wouldn't hook to do a low 13 and beat the 13.42.

With this LX I have now, I ended up running 13.1 @ almost 103 MPH [stock motor & intakes - just bolt ons] with the stock H pipe and cats.

The car now has what I would consider a nice exhuast.. the Mac equal shorties still, an off road X pipe, and Magnaflow cat back. I keep putting off the new heads/intake install because I am hell bent on going to the track one more time just to see if the exhuast really made a difference.. power wise it is the only real change I made from before when I ran 102.74 MPH.

Actually.. I went back to the stock bored MAF [the detonation problem is GONE and car pulls nicer] and put a 6AL box on and gapped the plugs .060", & 5 W 30 synthetic vs 10W 30 non b4, too...

My suspension should be totally setup by tomorrow, and if so I may just go Saturday before I swap all this new crap. I'm envious of all you stock guys that are in the 13.0s - high 12s and really wanted to join that club before the stuff went on.
 

BStevens

Founding Member
Aug 28, 2001
127
0
16
Grand Rapids, MI
Jun 24, 2004
#8
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #8
not only do longtubes provide better power. they sound a hell of a lot different in my mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
346
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
590
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
688
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
288
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
751
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?