• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Looking for 300 RWHP...

  • Thread starter Thread starter KG94GT
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2003

KG94GT

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
71
0
0
Virginia
www.sevmc.org
Dec 13, 2003
#1
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #1
Considering my mods below, can I get 300rwhp or close to it by means of add-ons like tune/custom chip and/or pulleys or what? I'm not adding an SC or nitrous to this car and I'm not going to do a head or cam change since I'm broke and the crate is almost new, etc... I dyno'd at 260rwhp and 297 torque and quite frankly I'm somewhat disappointed with this 340 crate motor from Ford. I had 24lb injectors and a 76 mm C&L maf but went bact to stock cause the car ran like Sh**... So, if there is hope, please let me know or should I be happy with what I have?

***Even 280 rwhp with over 300lb/torque would make me happier! At least the numbers would be closer to what FMS advertises..."

KG
 

Big Jay

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
130
0
0
50
Tucson, Az.
Dec 13, 2003
#2
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #2
You might try a new meter or even getting a PRO M Optimizer to "fine tune " the maf.Try lowering the fuel pressure. Also try experimenting with the timing, it might make more power at 14 but will probably make more torque at 8. Gap the plugs down a bit to .040 and only use the octane nessesary to keep ping away. Too much octane kills power.
 

KG94GT

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
71
0
0
Virginia
www.sevmc.org
Dec 13, 2003
#3
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #3
Tks Jay- Running 14 degrees now and no ping at all. I'll experiment with the maf/plugs etc. I'm assuming my question is do-able based on your response?
KG

Big Jay said:
You might try a new meter or even getting a PRO M Optimizer to "fine tune " the maf.Try lowering the fuel pressure. Also try experimenting with the timing, it might make more power at 14 but will probably make more torque at 8. Gap the plugs down a bit to .040 and only use the octane nessesary to keep ping away. Too much octane kills power.
Click to expand...
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
44
Tucson, AZ
www.geocities.com
Dec 13, 2003
#4
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #4
KG94GT said:
Tks Jay- Running 14 degrees now and no ping at all. I'll experiment with the maf/plugs etc. I'm assuming my question is do-able based on your response?
KG
Click to expand...

I would recommend you go back to the 24's and the 76mm MAF. You need the MAF for more flow, and you need the 24's for more fuel with your new-found air supply. Was the MAF calibrated for 24's?

I have heard about problems when changing the MAF. A chip should cure the problem. But you need someone else to post about that. I think I have read posts saying a custom chip curing their problems in this area.

You should also look into a bigger fuel pump. You need it.

I am looking for a post that someone did concerning the injector/fuel pump ratings (hp/tq wise). I will post back as soon as I find it.
Scott
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
44
Tucson, AZ
www.geocities.com
Dec 13, 2003
#5
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #5
Here is a link to rockin_rick's dissertation on injectors. BTW, 24lb injectors might not be enough. 19's are NOT ENOUGH!!! You are shortening their life by running them with the new combo.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=383674

The 19's are only good to 219 RWHP. You are running your injectors over MAX duty cycle now.

Scott
 

KG94GT

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
71
0
0
Virginia
www.sevmc.org
Dec 13, 2003
#6
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #6
Mo-

Thanks- I'm learning a lot here! The 24's and the 76maf was choking me with gas, (rich) fumes. Another told me that I may be washing the cylinders with all that fuel. Haven't heard the suggestion ref bigger pump but did hear that a fuel regulator may be needed when I had that combo. Didn't realize I was working the 19's to death and that only so much hp can come from them.... Keep it coming guys! I appreciate the advice!

KG
 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
3,352
2
58
41
Poughkeepsie, NY
Dec 13, 2003
#7
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #7
if you were running that rich with the 76 and the 24's then something had to be up with the fuel pressure...id get an adjustable fp regulator, and i didnt see underdrives mentioned on your mods list so you could look into them....and im sure a larger than stock MAF would make some power....and you could prolly pick up a couple ponies from a 65mm TB...but there are guys running like 10's on the stock TB so that may not be worth it....



Anthony
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
46
Dothan,Al
Dec 13, 2003
#8
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #8
the 19's are only good to 219rwhp????, that cant be true b/c there are a lot of people making more power thant that
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
43
Massachusetts
Dec 13, 2003
#9
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #9
Considering my mods below, can I get 300rwhp or close to it by means of add-ons like tune/custom chip and/or pulleys or what? I'm not adding an SC or nitrous to this car and I'm not going to do a head or cam change since I'm broke and the crate is almost new, etc... I dyno'd at 260rwhp and 297 torque and quite frankly I'm somewhat disappointed with this 340 crate motor from Ford. I had 24lb injectors and a 76 mm C&L maf but went bact to stock cause the car ran like Sh**... So, if there is hope, please let me know or should I be happy with what I have?
Click to expand...

Sometimes the dyno doesnt tell the whole story. Have you ever run that car at the track? What kind of dyno was it also, some types tend to give lower numbers.

I have the gt40 crate motor as well, but with the B cam. I managed 109.99 MPH in the 1/4 with it, and using online calcs, they usually say 335+ flywheel HP, which would seem pretty reasonable, of course these arent an exact science.

I also was using the stock maf/24# injectors, and it was untuned for the most part, just the basic things though tweecer like the shift retard, fans, egr etc.. The car ran mega rich, and when i took the heads off this winter the pistons had tons of carbon build up.

I would not be happy with what you have.. There must be something up, cause ur way down on power. I would deff do the pulleys, they are always good for some HP. But you must be running mega mega rich or something, i would consider a dyno tune.
 

DavidF

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
158
0
0
Ventura, Ca
Dec 13, 2003
#10
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #10
Ive never gone to a Dyno shop but I had allways assumed that they use a "sniffer" in the tail pipe and can tell you your A/F ratio thru your entire RPM range. And also adjust your timing accordingly, And wouldnt this be the best time to get a chip burnt so that all the necessary changes for the best performance would be saved?
 

KG94GT

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
71
0
0
Virginia
www.sevmc.org
Dec 13, 2003
#11
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #11
Yellow95,
I'm definitely not happy with the #'s I got a couple of weeks ago on the dyno and perhaps I'm putting to much trust in those dyno results. I haven't been to the track yet, but sometime in the Spring I'm heading that way. I definitely need a good dyno tune. I'm still running rich but nothing like before with the 24's/76..Sounds like I need to look back into the maf/injector situation-Tks!
KG
 

KG94GT

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
71
0
0
Virginia
www.sevmc.org
Dec 13, 2003
#12
  • Dec 13, 2003
  • #12
DavidF said:
Ive never gone to a Dyno shop but I had allways assumed that they use a "sniffer" in the tail pipe and can tell you your A/F ratio thru your entire RPM range. And also adjust your timing accordingly, And wouldnt this be the best time to get a chip burnt so that all the necessary changes for the best performance would be saved?
Click to expand...

Dave- A chip might be in the near future too! I'm told the Jet chip I have is a piece of S*** but my ride seems to run better than without it!
KG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B303 And Bbk Ssi Omfg
  • 88LX5.Oh
  • Oct 12, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
59
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 21, 2012
RangerJoe
G
frustrated with edelbrock/AFR 165 setup
  • Gojoshojoe
  • Apr 14, 2010
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2014
skiwesser11
C
  • Locked
The Teal Terminator!!!...LOTS of details
  • CarCrazyRDM
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
19K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Dec 22, 2010
CarCrazyRDM
C
C
some pics of the new car +others (56k run away)
  • cbarr300
  • Apr 24, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2008
cbarr300
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?